@sonhouse saidYou never cease to give us a chuckle. YOu act like he has been convicted. Entertain us and act like Biden has met the same fate wtih his his corruption, which, if you turn on FOX news rigiht now, this moment, they will be apprising America of quite a bit of evidence. You keep mentioning complaints about Trump, but not aboiut Joe Biden. (remember, this is not about Hunter....he is merely a vessel.)
@divegeester
Funny, I noticed the same thing. Average Joe says Trump is not above the law but continues to support him at every turn and refuses to even acknowledge there are charges, he is psychologically incapable of discussing the issues of Trump charges.
Note: The Trump discussions center arouind the 'interpretation' of his actions. Note for instance that video shows him saying to go to the Capitol in peace. INterpretation, you silly goose.
On the other hand, Biden has 170 SARs against him, 20 bank accounts....TWENTY bank accounts....tapes, emails, lap top, phone calls, drug family with burner phones,,,,,,,my fingers are getting tired! Ohhh, Sonhouse.................
As to my (Avjoe) being incapable of discussing the Trump issues, again, it is all speculation......see the FACTS on Biden. Or, just turn on FOX news. You little fellers-foreign can get a FIX app.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
@averagejoe1 saidthe only ones inciting on jan 6 was the fbi
Right! Right out of the School of Marauder. Why don't they charge him with Incitement? It happened a long time ago.
why was ray epps never charged?
@mott-the-hoople saidIt's rare to see someone lose an argument all by himself. Good job.
it doesnt dumbass
02 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidGuess how many of those bank accounts are Joe Biden's?
You never cease to give us a chuckle. YOu act like he has been convicted. Entertain us and act like Biden has met the same fate wtih his his corruption, which, if you turn on FOX news rigiht now, this moment, they will be apprising America of quite a bit of evidence. You keep mentioning complaints about Trump, but not aboiut Joe Biden. (remember, this is not about Hun ...[text shortened]... .see the FACTS on Biden. Or, just turn on FOX news. You little fellers-foreign can get a FIX app.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
02 Aug 23
@no1marauder saidALL of them, biden is the head of this crime syndicate. your question is a testament to money laundering.
Guess how many of those bank accounts are Joe Biden's?
They hid it for quite some time, it is all coming out now.
But you in your queer sex freak world dont care, that is the bottom line. You dont care about this country, you dont have family that has to live with this BS when you are gone.
02 Aug 23
@AverageJoe1
Because they have to have evidence and they do not have any.
He told people to protest peacefully. The people with Trump Derangement Syndrome like to forget that.
@no1marauder said""You missed the concept that I have explained So Many Times I Won't Write YOu Anymore!!!!" Was that Marauder that keeps saying that, or is it a schoolgirl?
Guess how many of those bank accounts are Joe Biden's?
Well, now I am saying it again like he is wont to do. Hunter is but a vessel. We don't care about a drug addict, I myself don't care about any drug addict. But we LOVE Hunter for his Christmas presents which keep on giving. It will help us to help all of 'you guys (ugh)' expose a crime family which Hunter happens to be a part of.
02 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidDoes your family know you are susceptible to these fever dreams?
""You missed the concept that I have explained So Many Times I Won't Write YOu Anymore!!!!" Was that Marauder that keeps saying that, or is it a schoolgirl?
Well, now I am saying it again like he is wont to do. Hunter is but a vessel. We don't care about a drug addict, I myself don't care about any drug addict. But we LOVE Hunter for his Christmas presents which ...[text shortened]... help us to help all of 'you guys (ugh)' expose a crime family which Hunter happens to be a part of.
02 Aug 23
@divegeester saidWhy are you obsessed with changing it every few weeks?
Why are you obsessed with my avatar?
02 Aug 23
@suzianne saidLet us stay on track, this is Suzianne making light of my post above. How is that a dream? There is no incitement charge. It is all political. There is no crime charged. It is subverting to criminalize a man who BELIEVES HE WON THE ELECTION, and he has a right to believe that. He has a right to be wrong. Your buddy Sonhouse thinks his being wrong, I guess, made him a liar, so he committed a crime. Trump is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. Y'all are writing and reasoning like children. The case is all about the 1st amendment, and Sue, the Right to be Wrong. He was wrong, but he didn't believe it.
Does your family know you are susceptible to these fever dreams?
They challenged the election. THAT is not a crime. Children. Ask Marauder. Was that a crime. Was there a conspiracy against rights? You know, Jack Smith and another person may have denied Trump of his rights under the constitution....If the court rules that he was denied his right, Jack Smith himself could be charged!!! By omitting that Trump actually said 'to be peaceful" etc. in his indictment, Smith has denied his rights, and Smith could be indicted.
Just something for you to chew on. All you fellers all half-cocked.
Biden's problems are MUCH tougher stuff.
@averagejoe1 saidYou should probably read the indictment before you start jabbering about what is and isn't in it. Lawyers on both sides always have plenty to talk about if there are important facts missing.
Let us stay on track, this is Suzianne making light of my post above. How is that a dream? There is no incitement charge. It is all political. There is no crime charged. It is subverting to criminalize a man who BELIEVES HE WON THE ELECTION, and he has a right to believe that. He has a right to be wrong. Your buddy Sonhouse thinks his being wrong, I guess, made him a ...[text shortened]... for you to chew on. All you fellers all half-cocked.
Biden's problems are MUCH tougher stuff.
02 Aug 23
@wildgrass saidOK. But you might tell your most sagacious friend Suzianne to round out her repertoire as well. Whew. A lot of work, I gotta tell you.
You should probably read the indictment before you start jabbering about what is and isn't in it. Lawyers on both sides always have plenty to talk about if there are important facts missing.
02 Aug 23
From Jack Smith:
Read the indictment.
The charges are not complicated.
There are no first amendment or constitutional disputes. There are no political statements.
It is a fact based narrative of actions taken to undermine democracy.
It is an indictment meticulously crafted for one purpose.
A conviction.
@averagejoe1 saidTrump defenders have made much of one sentence in the middle of his January 6th speech where he talked about being "peaceful". They don't talk about the following facts:
Let us stay on track, this is Suzianne making light of my post above. How is that a dream? There is no incitement charge. It is all political. There is no crime charged. It is subverting to criminalize a man who BELIEVES HE WON THE ELECTION, and he has a right to believe that. He has a right to be wrong. Your buddy Sonhouse thinks his being wrong, I guess, made him a ...[text shortened]... for you to chew on. All you fellers all half-cocked.
Biden's problems are MUCH tougher stuff.
Trump called for his followers to go to the Capitol on January 6th, the day Congress was to certify the election.
He said it was going to be "wild".
In his speech, which repeated numerous election fraud claims which his own advisers had informed him were false, and exhorted the crowd to "Stop the Steal".
He told them if they didn't "fight like hell" they "wouldn't have a country anymore."
He called on them to march to the Capitol saying he would be marching with them (which he didn't).
Within minutes of the conclusion of his speech, but not before, thousands of the crowd began attacking police in a successful attempt to break through their lines and enter the Capitol.
Trump watched the violence on TV and despite pleas from several advisors refused to order more law enforcement resources or make a public statement calling on the rioters to leave.
He chastised several advisors who recommended he make such a public statement as not caring as much as the mob about the "stolen" election and justified the violence as being something that happened because people were upset about the "Steal".
All indicators are that Trump wanted the crowd to disrupt the certification and was quite pleased they did.