@AverageJoe1
Did you read the indictment? Do you really think this is a witch hunt? When it is his OWN PEOPLE telling him he lost but he weaponized it anyway, what more do you need? Do you remember his statement "I will be YOUR retribution'', do you deny he said that? Do you know what that means?
03 Aug 23
@AverageJoe1
Sure he said go in peace but that was a dodge and you know it. One of the lines of evidence shows Trump actively calling politicians to get votes to overturn the election DURING THE RIOTS. But that means nothing to you either, does it?
03 Aug 23
@sonhouse saidHis opinion (not yours, Trump hater 😠) , was that, based on advice which he believed to be true, he had been wronged. Are you with me so far? So, retribution, to him, would be the proper word. If you had any scintilla of an open mind, you would agree with me.
@AverageJoe1
Did you read the indictment? Do you really think this is a witch hunt? When it is his OWN PEOPLE telling him he lost but he weaponized it anyway, what more do you need? Do you remember his statement "I will be YOUR retribution'', do you deny he said that? Do you know what that means?
03 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidMott said a while back something to the effect that the stock market does not sink the economy. That is correct. Sonhouse went nuts, wrongfully chastising this correct statement of Mott.
Sonhouse owes Mott an apology
I demand that Sonhouse apologize to Mott. I know people in the Monitor Wheelhouse, they are watching.
@no1marauder saidMental brain and Smott are two of the biggist a$$holes on this site Oh yeah I can't leave out avg.hoe
I did.
You calling someone a "liar", again? You play that idiotic game all the time when someone can easily verify their statements.
Is that just stupidity on your part or some moronic "strategy" right wing media taught you? Metal Brain plays that game, too.
@averagejoe1 saidThe prosecution seems quite confident that it can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew he lost the election but sought to overturn it by illegal means regardless. See Paragraph 11 of the indictment.
His opinion (not yours, Trump hater 😠) , was that, based on advice which he believed to be true, he had been wronged. Are you with me so far? So, retribution, to him, would be the proper word. If you had any scintilla of an open mind, you would agree with me.
03 Aug 23
2 edits
@no1marauder saidWitness testimony. Audio recordings.
The prosecution seems quite confident that it can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew he lost the election but sought to overturn it by illegal means regardless. See Paragraph 11 of the indictment.
Trump can never keep his mouth shut.
03 Aug 23
@no1marauder saidA real persecution prosecution exercise to do away with a political opponent while sitting on a beach. You are part of this. SCOTUS May see it a bit different than you do however, persecution is not their thing.
The prosecution seems quite confident that it can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew he lost the election but sought to overturn it by illegal means regardless. See Paragraph 11 of the indictment.
No idea if his lawyers straighten this up, but if they do, we will have a HELL of a good time watching him wreck DC!
Now get back to your persecution. Prideful indeed.
If I am wrong, you will get Biden. President of the USA. You would be AMAZED at the bomb shelter I have established for my children/grandchildren. They will easily qualify as Socialists, The children of others will unfortunately live under govt thumb, but not on the level of socialists. It will be a ‘reserved’ level. I hate it man, but one must look after his own, I am sure you will agree.
@no1marauder saidwas he confident on this case too? you make a fool of yourself too easily
The prosecution seems quite confident that it can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew he lost the election but sought to overturn it by illegal means regardless. See Paragraph 11 of the indictment.
"Former Virginia Republican Gov. Robert McDonnell – once prosecuted by now-Special Counsel Jack Smith for violating federal bribery law only to see his conviction unanimously overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court – said the ex-war crimes prosecutor would rather win a case than have the facts correct."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-virginia-gov-who-saw-conviction-by-jack-smith-thrown-out-says-hed-rather-win-than-get-it-right
03 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidWas throwing Manson in jail just the prosecution "persecuting" him?
A real persecution prosecution exercise to do away with a political opponent while sitting on a beach. You are part of this. SCOTUS May see it a bit different than you do however, persecution is not their thing.
No idea if his lawyers straighten this up, but if they do, we will have a HELL of a good time watching him wreck DC!
Now get back to your persecution. Pr ...[text shortened]... ll be a ‘reserved’ level. I hate it man, but one must look after his own, I am sure you will agree.
They're doing their jobs. Simple as.
Do you believe all criminals should go free?
03 Aug 23
@mott-the-hoople saidSue asked me if criminals should go free. How do I answer that, I am still a neophyte on the Forum. Is it a trick question? Sounds more like a trick-questioner.
was he confident on this case too? you make a fool of yourself too easily
"Former Virginia Republican Gov. Robert McDonnell – once prosecuted by now-Special Counsel Jack Smith for violating federal bribery law only to see his conviction unanimously overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court – said the ex-war crimes prosecutor would rather win a case than have the fact ...[text shortened]... ia/ex-virginia-gov-who-saw-conviction-by-jack-smith-thrown-out-says-hed-rather-win-than-get-it-right