Originally posted by flyUnityWill you quit with the damn slippery slope argument?
100 years ago you wouldve never met anyone who wanted to legalize same sex marriage either, I said "soon". In 20 years once Gay marriage is legal, and put behind us, The "Progessive thinkers of that time" will most likely want to do the same with animals
It's completely retarded.
Originally posted by flyUnity100 years ago, people like you would have been arguing against interracial marriage.
100 years ago you wouldve never met anyone who wanted to legalize same sex marriage either, I said "soon". In 20 years once Gay marriage is legal, and put behind us, The "Progessive thinkers of that time" will most likely want to do the same with animals
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI am against gay marriages but I can't think of any logical reason why, so I mark it up to irrational prejudice on my part and am for gay marriages.
And interracial marriage proponents would have said, "What slippery slope? It's not like anybody wants to allow gays to get married."
It's not easy being me ...
I've yet to hear a rational case being made against gay marriages without the "slippery slope" of dogs marrying cats and so forth.
If you or anybody else would like to explain to me why gay marriage is in some way wrong, I'm listening.
EDIT: What is marriage anyways but a contract?
Originally posted by Raw760Hi Raw,
Did not mean to offend.
I am not a homophobe, or some narrow minded prick. At least not narrow-minded.
I have no strong feelings on the topic either way.
Back to the hail and brimstone!
No problem. I was just joking with ya. No harm intended. 🙂
Sorry if that little joke came out the wrong way.
Originally posted by flyUnityYes, how right you are. you have just absolutely hit the nail on the head. i am already secretly clamouring for the day that I can marry my golf clubs, we love each other so much. You have brilliantly and insightfully cut to the flawed heart of my argument, and i prostrate myself before you.
So do you think that if a person wants to get married to a monkey he should be entitled to a marriage license, that permits them to own land together, have a tax break, and all the other marriage benefits? The so called "progressive" thinkers will soon want to legalize marriage between animals, then maybe objects. Its gotta stop somewhere. So the governm ...[text shortened]... nce to anyone, but to a man and a women.
I'm in no way saying that the act should be illegal
Well done in showing me the error of my liberal ways. What a fundamentally brilliant debator you are. Actually, i would say you are a master debator.
Originally posted by KneverKnightThe liberal case against gay marriage.
I've yet to hear a rational case being made against gay marriages without the "slippery slope" of dogs marrying cats and so forth.
If you or anybody else would like to explain to me why gay marriage is in some way wrong, I'm listening.
EDIT: What is marriage anyways but a contract?
http://www.thepublicinterest.com/archives/2004summer/article1.html
Originally posted by checkbaiterAnd what about all the other sexually transmitted diseases, granted they are not as serious as aids, but will you blame the gay community for that too ?
I believe Aids began with the homosexual community, and has since spread due to bisexuals, then on to hetrosexuals.
One thing that amused me about that website was this page
http://www.straight-talk.net/gay/kids.shtml
Targeting our kids
here are a couple of quotes
Homosexual activists know that the best time to reach children is at the earliest ages. In fact, Christian researcher George Barna has found that the chance for an individual to accept Christ greatly diminishes after the age of 14. This is one of the reasons why homosexual activists, the ACLU, and their allies try so hard to deny Christians their equal access rights to school property. If they are successful in limiting children's exposure to the Gospel while feeding them a steady diet of homosexual indoctrination during these impressionable years, they are well on their way to victory. - James Anderson11
"[Homosexuals] feel if they can indoctrinate children at an early age, those children will never even be open to the message that other groups have been telling the truth about homosexuals — which is that people are not born gay and that they can change," - Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council40
This is really rich considering the christain church has been targeting children for years, christenings & sunday school etc....
1 edit
Originally posted by Jay PeateaBoy, don't you know it. Gays have these cabbalistic secret child
And what about all the other sexually transmitted diseases, granted they are not as serious as aids, but will you blame the gay community for that too ?
One thing that amused me about that website was this page
http://www.straight-talk.net/gay/kids.shtml
Targeting our kids
here are a couple of quotes
Homosexual activists know that the b ...[text shortened]... the christain church has been targeting children for years, christenings & sunday school etc....
conversion societies hidden deep within the YMCA and the Boy Scouts
and the Candy Stripers, every youth organization has to deal with
these secret sects, look at the Mickey Mouse Club, they even
get on TV! They start out nicely enough, Want some Candy, they
say, furtively, on street corners. Pretty soon they are dry humping
in the public toilets. After that its only a matter of time, the gay
childrens capture league has quotas to keep and they have records
of every child they convert and an even longer list of children
who seem suseptible. They have secret handshakes too. I bet
you thought the limp wrist thing was natural for them. Its actually
a hidden code, gay sign language that announces to the capture
league how many kids they converted that week. WATCH OUT,
THEY ARE EVERYWHERE!!
Originally posted by flyUnityYou get a rec for that one...good point...why can't I marry a donkey and adopt 4 chimpanzee's...could I get a tax deduction here?
So do you think that if a person wants to get married to a monkey he should be entitled to a marriage license, that permits them to own land together, have a tax break, and all the other marriage benefits? I don't see marriage as a right, I see it as a privilege, the same as I see a drivers license a privilege, and not as a right. Not to say that I think t ...[text shortened]... nce to anyone, but to a man and a women.
I'm in no way saying that the act should be illegal
And I seem to remember God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
😉