18 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFThere's a reason why private messages are understood to be private. I don't know why either one of you haven't put the other in their ignore list, especially since this same problem has come up before.
Huh? When did I say anything even remotely like this. I have kept maybe 5,000+ messages private in my time here and shared 2 with other regular posters. How do you extrapolate from this that I have no reason to keep any messages private? You're clutching at straws Suzianne. I showed people your message because of its content (just as I did years ago with one fro ...[text shortened]... record rooted in a keen sense of protocol based on strong reasons for keeping messages private.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by lemon limeWell, I didn't prevent her from sending me messages. If you've followed the discussion, you'll know that I didn't block her facility to send me messages and I certainly won't report her to the web site for "harassment" if she does. It's up to her to contact me if she wants to. I haven't prevented her. But she knows what happens if she sends a message like the one Handy Andy posted on page 7. There has been complete transparency in fact. 😉
You're also under no obligation to prevent her from sending you private messages.
Originally posted by FMFFMF,
Well, I didn't prevent her from sending me messages. If you've followed the discussion, you'll know that I didn't block her facility to send me messages and I certainly won't report her to the web site for "harassment" if she does. It's up to her to contact me if she wants to. I haven't prevented her. But she knows what happens if she sends a message like the one Handy Andy posted on page 7. There has been complete transparency in fact. 😉
Serious question for you? Have you tried sucking on a soother nipple? You sound like a big baby, perhaps that is all you need to make you happy. 😛
-VR
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by lemon limeThis has been dealt with extensively already. Haven't you read the thread? I suggest you address the arguments already laid out by me, Ghost of a Duke, divegeester, wolfgang59 and Rank outsider and a few others. The same problem certainly has not been caused by me before; I have never sent even an angry message, let alone one with bizarre accusations and threats that was clearly an abuse of the facility.
There's a reason why [b]private messages are understood to be private. I don't know why either one of you haven't put the other in their ignore list, especially since this same problem has come up before.[/b]
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by Very RustySuzianne will presumably appreciate your support in her supposedly principled campaign to wipe out insults, name calling and abuse and restore the standards of decency that she claims this forum once had. 😉
Serious question for you? Have you tried sucking on a soother nipple? You sound like a big baby, perhaps that is all you need to make you happy.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFThe same problem certainly has not been caused by me before
This has been dealt with extensively already. Haven't you read the thread? I suggest you address the arguments already laid out by me, Ghost of a Duke, divegeester, wolfgang59 and Rank outsider and a few others. The same problem certainly has [b]not been caused by me before; I have never sent even an angry message, let alone one with bizarre accusations and threats that was clearly an abuse of the facility.[/b]
I'm talking about problems caused by you sharing private message conversations.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by lemon limeIf, by "problems", you mean all the silly name-calling and insults and parody arguments that have come my way, then I don't consider it to be a problem at all. It's water off a duck's back. You'd know this if you'd read the thread.
I'm talking about problems caused by you sharing private message conversations.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFI've read enough of it to understand what you're doing.
If, by "problems", you mean all the silly name-calling and insults and parody arguments that have come my way, then I don't consider it to be a problem at all. It's water off a duck's back. You'd know this if you'd read the thread.
Originally posted by lemon limeYes. What I have been doing is not keeping her behaviour secret. And I have most likely headed off possible similar ludicrous messaging in the future at the pass. Indeed, she may well never send a message like that to anyone ever again. She knows exactly where she stands. It's all good. There are no "problems" for me as you seem to think.
I've read enough of it to understand what you're doing.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by lemon limeBut not enough, obviously, to have prevented you from raising points - chaney3-style and Very Rusty-style - that had already been addressed by several different people numerous times. 😛
I've read enough of it to understand what you're doing.
Originally posted by FMFThere are no "problems" for me as you seem to think.
Yes. What I have been doing is not keeping her behaviour secret. And I have most likely headed off possible similar ludicrous messaging in the future at the pass. Indeed, she may well never send a message like that to anyone ever again. She knows exactly where she stands. It's all good. There are no "problems" for me as you seem to think.
Who said anything about problems for you? If the only way you know how to deal with a pm you don't like is to make it public, then you are the problem.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by lemon limeBut the suggestion that the only way I know how to deal with a message I "don't like" is to make it public is preposterous. The options I had have been discussed and my course of action explained in full You need to read the thread.
If the only way you know how to deal with a pm you don't like is to make it public, then you [b]are a problem.[/b]