18 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneWho said anything about "lulz"? 😕
There seem to be very few that do it "for the lulz" anymore. Rottweilers don't do it "for the lulz" either. It's often the ones who SAY they do it "for the lulz" who are the most vicious. If that's how you get your "lulz", I'm glad I don't know you.
Originally posted by SuzianneSpeaking of "thinned skinned", why did you block FMF from replying to your message immediately after sending it?
And I imagine that the takeaway here must be to not send private messages to thin-skinned people looking only to puff themselves up as some sort of 'forum hero'.
Originally posted by lemon limeIndeed and my decision like yours has proven to be a wise choice.
My decision to block you isn't evidence, you provided evidence confirming my decision.Taking a private message and making it public knowledge is evidence that blocking you was the right decision.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3Oh no. You've called me a "pansy" again. That's so mean. 😲
This post of yours is as stupid as it gets!!
Based on your points 1 & 2, there was NO basis to share her PM.
The 'onus' is to keep a PM secret.
But, it is obvious that you will deny, deny, deny.....because you have proven to be a pansy, as noted by myself and most others on this thread.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneI'd say the takeaway here for you is even if you never truly realize what a silly and unpleasant headless chicken you are, don't send for-the-birds messages like the one you sent to me to people who have been trying to tell you - for years - that you are ~ truly ~ a silly and unpleasant headless chicken.
And I imagine that the takeaway here must be to not send private messages to thin-skinned people looking only to puff themselves up as some sort of 'forum hero'.
Originally posted by FMFStill beating up on the ladies. Man this isn't turning out very well for you.
I'd say the takeaway here for you is even if you never truly realize what a silly and unpleasant headless chicken you are, don't send for-the-birds messages like the one you sent to me to people who have been trying to tell you - for years - that you are ~ truly ~ a silly and unpleasant headless chicken.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFYou know I said that, and yes I am against name calling and all the rest of it, but I was just making a point.
I thought you said you were against these kinds of posts, no?
I'm trying to say something directed at the topic and not at any particular individual. It's not easy.
I'm trying to say what I think, and not what I feel. And I feel real bad about all this. If I make it personal I'm only going to feel worse. I'm trying to stay objective as best I can. I'm trying to get through.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFSo, again, if you receive a PM that you don't like, you feel free to completely abandon social convention and spread it around as some sort of bizarre and self-serving "payback"? All this shows me is that you have no social restraint. You just do what you like and everyone else be damned.
Huh? When did I say anything even remotely like this. I have kept maybe 5,000+ messages private in my time here and shared 2 with other regular posters. How do you extrapolate from this that I have no reason to keep any messages private? You're clutching at straws Suzianne. I showed people your message because of its content (just as I did years ago with one fro ...[text shortened]... record rooted in a keen sense of protocol based on strong reasons for keeping messages private.
Well, I guess you won't be alone in feeling this way. The US will soon have a President just like you.
Originally posted by FMFAll you're doing here is vilifying someone most of us know and respect and enjoy the friendship of in spite of our differences.
I'd say the takeaway here for you is even if you never truly realize what a silly and unpleasant headless chicken you are, don't send for-the-birds messages like the one you sent to me to people who have been trying to tell you - for years - that you are ~ truly ~ a silly and unpleasant headless chicken.
We all have faults. Is it your intention to crush Suzianne on a personal level, publicly?
You will fail if you are, and that's exactly what it looks like to the majority except divegeester.
Your's and his continuous belittling of Suzianne is going to be your downfall. Let's not let that happen for all our sakes.
Originally posted by SuzianneGood grief. You talking about "social restraint" when it is your crazy PM, and it's you putting FMF on block straight afterwards so he can't reply to you. It's you using Trump as an insult at someone because of sharing a PM! Really...
So, again, if you receive a PM that you don't like, you feel free to completely abandon social convention and spread it around as some sort of bizarre and self-serving "payback"? All this shows me is that you have no social restraint. You just do what you like and everyone else be damned.
Well, I guess you won't be alone in feeling this way. The US will soon have a President just like you.
What's next Nazis, Hitler, Pol Pot?