29 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by sasquatch672You're right. I just wanted to make sure as many people were aware of it as possible.
Shouldn't this, and your other thread, be in site ideas?
Regarding another issue in this thread, the only reason it is a subscriber-only vote is just to avoid the possible case of fake accounts placing votes.
29 Aug 06
Originally posted by ChrisIf they are fake you should ban them.
You're right. I just wanted to make sure as many people were aware of it as possible.
Regarding another issue in this thread, the only reason it is a subscriber-only vote is just to avoid the possible case of fake accounts placing votes.
29 Aug 06
Originally posted by ChrisYes, a vote is needed!
I have put another vote up - [vid]13[/vid].
This is a simple Yes/No vote to decide if we need to make the vacation flag give immunity to timeouts.
The time that would be allowed to stay in vacation mode would be limited (if the vote comes out as a Yes, we will put up another vote on the time period), and I imagine it being about three or four weeks per year.
29 Aug 06
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveNo, we would rejoice at a massive influx of subscribers! You are not experiencing the best aspects of this site. Tournaments and more importantly Clans make this my 'one stop' chess adventure. Is it so expensive?
Subscribers will rejoice at the mass departure of us poor non-subs.:'(:'(:'(
29 Aug 06
Originally posted by MarinkatombIf someone wants to play lots of games, play in tournaments,clans and sieges, it is a fantastic reason to subscribe - and well worth it - I've actually recommended a couple of friends to do so.
No, we would rejoice at a massive influx of subscribers! You are not experiencing the best aspects of this site. Tournaments and more importantly Clans make this my 'one stop' chess adventure. Is it so expensive?
But, for myself, who wishes to play just the 6 games currently allowed for free it makes sense for me to put up with the nags and adverts instead.
