Originally posted by huckleberryhoundI voted yesterday. There has been about 300 votes then, and a very clear majority had voted "No."
yeah, not everyone uses the general forum, seemed only right to PM everyone. . . nice one.
Its great to have mass sufferage, but it would have been even nicer if PMs had also directed voters to a discussion or debate or had been given some background, some argument and counter argument as what the issue is about.
Instead of "Would you happy if..."
Ooh, yes, I would be happy. tick click.
Originally posted by GatecrasherYou can change your vote bud 🙂
I voted yesterday. There has been about 300 votes then, and a very clear majority had voted "No."
Its great to have mass sufferage, but it would have been even nicer if PMs had also directed voters to a discussion or debate or had been given some background, some argument and counter argument as what the issue is about.
Instead of "Would you happy if..."
Ooh, yes, I would be happy. tick click.
Originally posted by Freddie2006Feel free to support my idea via the local currency 😛
I think this is a really good idea, and you can tell by how many people voted in these two, as opposed to the others which were only advertised in the forums.
Thread 50858
Originally posted by rhbYou should be ashamed of yerself. You've unleashed a hideous monster that will ultimately plunge this site into mindless mediocrity.
Feel free to support my idea via the local currency 😛
Thread 50858
Originally posted by ChrisWhen you cast a yes vote, your name should forever be displayed in red. The nos shall remain blue.
I have put another vote up - [vid]13[/vid].
This is a simple Yes/No vote to decide if we need to make the vacation flag give immunity to timeouts.
The time that would be allowed to stay in vacation mode would be limited (if the vote comes out as a Yes, we will put up another vote on the time period), and I imagine it being about three or four weeks per year.