"Internet Trolls..."

Originally posted by FMF
Your defence of covering up sexual abuse of children is all there in black and white. If I dig out the thread will you go through it and defend what you said on it?

All one needs to do is ask you for evidence of a cover up. Will you produce it now.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
All one needs to do is ask you for evidence of a cover up. Will you produce it now.

You argued in favour of your organisation covering up child sex abuse cases and them not turning over child molesters to the authorities.

Originally posted by FMF
You argued in favour of your organisation covering up child sex abuse cases and them not taking child molesters to the authorities.

Will you produce your evidence of a cover up as you have alledged or will you continue to lie about having it. Either you have evidence or you do not. If you have it produce it now. Second time asking.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Will you produce your evidence of a cover up as you have alledged or will you continue to lie about having it. Either you have evidence or you do not. If you have it produce it now. Second time asking.

I am not particularly interested in the case in which the JW organisation was found guilty in court of covering up sexual abuse. That was a court's decision and that is that. I am more interested in how you argued in favour of your organisation covering up child sex abuse cases.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Will you produce your evidence of a cover up....

I am not interested in the court case that the JW organisation lost in this matter. You can start a thread about the evidence in that case if you choose.

Originally posted by FMF
I am not particularly interested in the case in which the JW organisation was found guilty in court of covering up sexual abuse. That was a court's decision and that is that. I am more interested in how you argued in favour of your organisation covering up child sex abuse cases.

You were not asked what find interesting you were asked to substantiate allegations you have made concerning myself. We shall ask you a last time FMF where is your evidence of a cover up. If you will not or cannot produce it then logically we must assume (and you know how we loathe assumptions ) that you simply made it up and expect other people to believe your lies. So either you have evidence or you do not either you can substantiate your allegations or you cannot.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
We shall ask you a last time FMF where is your evidence of a cover up

You are not accused of a cover up. I am saying that you argued in favour of covering up sex abuse cases. I am making no allegation that you were involved in a cover up. I am saying that you clearly and explicitly defended the cover up of child sex abuse in your organisation and argued that those child abusers who are repentant ought not to be turned over to the police to face punishment for their crimes.

Originally posted by FMF
You are not accused of a cover up. I am saying that you argued in favour of covering up sex abuse cases. I am making no allegation that you were involved in a cover up. I am saying that you clearly and explicitly defended the cover up of child sex abuse in your organisation and argued that those child abusers who are repentant ought not to be turned over to the police to face punishment for their crimes.

Yes but if there was no cover up my logically challenged friend I cannot be guilty of defending a cover up as you have publicly alledged can I? So either you have evidence or you expect us to believe your lies. This is not going very well for you FMF not as you expected. Where is your evidence of a cover up fourth time asking.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes but if there was no cover up my logically friend I cannot be guilty of defending a cover up as you have publicly alledged can I? So either you have evidence or you expect us to believe your lies. This is not going very well for you FMF not as you expected.

You advocated for the covering up of child sex abuse cases in your organisation. The court case which prompted the thread in which you defended cover ups in this way was one in which the JW organisation was found guilty of a cover up. I am not seeking to debate that guilty verdict with you, I am talking to you about your argument in favour of covering up sex abuse cases and not alerting the authorities.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Where is your evidence of a cover up fourth time asking.

Read my posts, robbie. I am not accusing you of a cover up. I am asking you if you remember defending cover ups in principle.

Originally posted by FMF
You advocated for the covering up of child sex abuse cases in your organisation. The court case which prompted the thread in which you defended cover ups in this way was one in which the JW organisation was found guilty of a cover up. I am not seeking to debate that guilty verdict with you, I am talking to you about your argument in favour of covering up sex abuse cases and not alerting the authorities.

Your evidence of a cover up please. We know that you like to fabricate lies about people and make serious allegations which have no basis in reality so we shall ask you again to substantiate your allegations. Where is your evidence of a cover up. You dont have any do you, you simply made it up, didn't you because that's the type of person you are isn't it. Tell the truth FMF for once in your life face yourself. You are simply a slanderous liar are you not? I make no moral judgement of you FMF but you are what you are.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your evidence of a cover up please. .

In any case or cases where the JW organisation has been prosecuted and found guilty of covering up sexual abuse of children, you should take it up with the courts that found them guilty, not with me.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Where is your evidence of a cover up.

Take it up with the courts that found the JW organisation guilty. I am discussing your advocacy for the cover up - in principle - of child sex abuse cases. You must surely remember making the case. The last time I confronted you with it you were rattled good and proper and you pretended that I had accused you of child abuse and used that as a pretext for not responding to any posts for weeks. Surely you remember?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Tell the truth FMF for once in your life face yourself. You are simply a slanderous liar are you not? I make no moral judgement of you FMF but you are what you are.

Surely you remember making the case for covering up sex abuse in the JW organisation? I can dig out the thread if you are willing to discuss it properly.

Originally posted by FMF
In any case or cases where the JW organisation has been prosecuted and found guilty of covering up sexual abuse of children, you should take it up with the courts that found them guilty, not with me.

No you substantiate your claims you frothy windbag. You have produced nothing but slander, lies and windbag propaganda based on srlf assumptions and if that wasn't enough you insult the intelligence of everyone you expect to swallow your wash. Let it serve as s lesson to windbags everywhere.