Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo one here has accused you of child abuse nor of defending child abuse and you pretending that this is happening is your familiar mechanism for running off claiming you have been persecuted in some way. Pathetic frankly.
you can dig out anything you like but if you state that i have defended child abuse once more i am reporting you to the site administration for serious defamation of character. It wasn't that when someone here was accusing you of child abuse, was it, you were not very happy then you hypocrite.
Originally posted by divegeesteryes because i don't really have to go to the hospital, you self assuming pompous windbag. why don't you just stop making assumptions about people. the only thing that's pathetic is your singular belief in your own windbaggery
No one here has accused you of child abuse nor of defending child abuse and you pretending that this is happening is your familiar mechanism for running off claiming you have been persecuted in some way. Pathetic frankly.
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou won't be able to sidestep the thread's content by claiming that I am accusing you of child abuse or some such. You defended covering it up, and you had your reasons. If I can show you where you did this, are you willing to go through it?
why do you want an appointment?
Originally posted by FMFthis is just further evidence of willingness to make assumptions about people, your question is based on an assumption of guilt, is it not? why would you make an assumption of someone guilt, because you are a self assuming pompous windbag, is that not the case FMF? that is why you have framed your question in such a way as it assumes guilt, not very clever again and further evidence or your proclivity for self assumption,. Thanks for that.
You won't be able to sidestep the thread's content by claiming that I am accusing you of child abuse or some such. You defended covering it up, and you had your reasons. If I can show you where you did this, are you willing to go through it?
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThere is no "assumption of guilt". There is simply what you wrote on that thread in defence of covering up child sex abuse in your organisation. You were totally open about your defence. Nothing is subject to "assumption". It is all there in black and white.
this is just further evidence of willingness to make assumptions about people, your question is based on an assumption of guilt, is it not? why would you make an assumption of someone guilt, because you are a self assuming pompous windbag, is that not the case FMF? that is why you have framed your question in such a way as it assumes guilt, not very clever again.
Originally posted by FMFIts an assumption of guilt on two counts one that there is a cover up and secondly that i am guilty of defending a so called cover up. Its simply more evidence of your self assuming pompous windbaggery.
There is no "assumption of guilt". There is simply what you wrote on that thread in defence of covering up child sex abuse in your organisation. You were totally open about your defence. Nothing is subject to "assumption". It is all there in black and white.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29245
Originally posted by divegeesterRead 16 pages of Mr Carrobie and Divegeester whiff-whaff?!? (Ping pong).
Religion has little to do with what is being discussed, obviously your beautiful Sunday morning was not disturbed sufficiently for you to bother to read the thread. 🙂
Have you been eating lard?
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeYou are, or course under no compulsion to read or post in any thread that does not pique your interest. In fact I would say your contridbution to the thread, certainly your last few posts, have been quite pointless and whiffy-whaffy.
Read 16 pages of Mr Carrobie and Divegeester whiff-whaff?!? (Ping pong).
Have you been eating lard?
Originally posted by divegeesterAnswer the question have you been scoffing lard?
You are, or course under no compulsion to read or post in any thread that does not pique your interest. In fact I would say your contridbution to the thread, certainly your last few posts, have been quite pointless and whiffy-whaffy.
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour defence of covering up sexual abuse of children is all there in black and white. If I dig out the thread will you go through it and defend what you said on it?
Its an assumption of guilt on two counts one that there is a cover up and secondly that i am guilty of defending a so called cover up. Its simply more evidence of your self assuming pompous windbaggery.