13 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLol. I certainly doesn't look like that Robbie. It just looks like you, on the internet, underpants at ankles. Once again.
No FMF is getting a taste of his own medicine and clearly he doesn't like it. You were telling us how any convictions have ensued from these 100's of allegations, were you not?
13 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhen have I ever attempted to taunt or deflect from a discussion by talking about whether the poster I was talking to had "duped minors"? How is you doing this in anyway a "medicine"?
No FMF is getting a taste of his own medicine and clearly he doesn't like it.
13 Feb 16
Both FMF and divesgeester have made the claim based on a report that they cited that there have been 1000's of allegation of child abuse made against Jehovahs Witnesses, I would like them to publican tell the forum out of these 1000's of allegations how many convictions have there been. Thankyou.
13 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy don't you just read the article that everyone else has read?
Both FMF and divesgeester have made the claim based on a report that they cited that there have been 1000's of allegation of child abuse made against Jehovahs Witnesses, I would like them to publican tell the forum out of these 1000's of allegations how many convictions have there been. Thankyou.
Originally posted by divegeesterOh dear you seem to have a proclivity for imagining people with their pants down, do you have a bum fetish? are you living a lie?
Lol. I certainly doesn't look like that Robbie. It just looks like you, on the internet, underpants at ankles. Once again.
13 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobie549 people confessed to sexually abusing/raping children, their confessions were hushed up and they weren't reported to the police. Is this part of the 'awesomeness' of JW's you frequently mention?
Nope i have no issues with any allegations, if people allege that they have been the victims of abuse then let it go to a court of law.
13 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieCheers. Yes, it is what I mentioned in my earlier post: whenever there is not
No and it begs belief how you could extricate the idea from my text. Perhaps you might explain your thought process.
an unequivocal position regarding a stance of normative magnitude, I try to
find out whether the person leans towards positivism or naturalism. Those are
the two main schools of thought in matters of rules and morality.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs you well know many cant go to court as the incidents weren't reported at the time. That's the whole point, over a thousand allegations of child sexual abuse not reported to the authorities by your wise and wonderful leadership. How you can defend that is absolutely... frightening actually.
Then let it go to a court of law, its really very simple.