@divegeester saidSee my post above.
See my reply to Torunn two posts above .
Edit:
Why?
David said, 'I have never cheated on any of my women. well not to their knowledge.'
Suzianne's reply, 'They know more than you think, and they either put up with it or just let it go.'
I don't think this is rocket science to decipher. If Suzianne is right and they know more than David thinks, then clearly they have decided to either put up with it or let it go (otherwise they would be out the door). - What has feminism got to do with it? It's a valid observation.
317d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSee my post several posts above.
See my post above.
Edit:
Why?
David said, 'I have never cheated on any of my women. well not to their knowledge.'
Suzianne's reply, 'They know more than you think, and they either put up with it or just let it go.'
I don't think this is rocket science to decipher. If Suzianne is right and they know more than David thinks, then clearly they have decided ...[text shortened]... erwise they would be out the door). - What has feminism got to do with it? It's a valid observation.
@divegeester saidThis is a blatant misrepresentation of what Suzianne wrote.
In what way do we differ?
[A reminder of my position here:
It seems an odd generalisation for female to assert that women will tolerate sexual infidelity. The assertion seems odder combing from a professed feminist.]
If she is right and they know more than David thinks, then clearly they have decided to either put up with it or let it go (otherwise they would be out the door). It is a valid observation and has nothing to do with feminism.
317d
@divegeester saidI think this has burst your bubble:
Are you going to allow Ghost of a Dukes usual performative countermeasures to deny you the opportunity to discuss this?
If she is right and they know more than David thinks, then clearly they have decided to either put up with it or let it go (otherwise they would be out the door). It is a valid observation and has nothing to do with feminism.
317d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don’t think it is, but I look forward to Suzianne’s usual swathe of scorn and victimhood to follow in the wake of you trawling the channel once again.
This is a blatant misrepresentation of what Suzianne wrote.
317d
@divegeester saidI'm a little embarrassed for you.
I don’t think it is, but I look forward to Suzianne’s usual swathe of scorn and victimhood to follow in the wake of you trawling the channel once again.
317d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLet’s see what Suzianne has to say about it.
I think this has burst your bubble:
If she is right and they know more than David thinks, then clearly they have decided to either put up with it or let it go (otherwise they would be out the door). It is a valid observation and has nothing to do with feminism.
To be fair she could take a dump on your office desk and you’d call it an ornament.
317d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYeah yeah heard it all before pink cheeks.
I'm a little embarrassed for you.
317d
@divegeester saidAll that has occurred in this exchange is you misunderstanding a post and then getting all bent out of shape when auto mod flags one of your posts.
Let’s see what Suzianne has to say about it.
To be fair she could take a dump on your office desk and you’d call it an ornament.
317d
@ponderable saidYou’ve gone quiet…
What I got from about 1 minute reading:
Claim : I cheated, but she didn't know.
Answer1: men *eyeroll* translation: How can you possibly know?
Answer2 (professed feminist): They did know, but chose to ignore
Some would expect a feminist not to put up with demeaing behaviour.
Some would expect a person to make personal choices apüart from dogmatic convictions.
You gonna back away from this pretty good assessment you made a couple of pages back now that Ghost has chipped in?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo Ponderable got it wrong too?
All that has occurred in this exchange is you misunderstanding a post and then getting all bent out of shape when auto mod flags one of your posts.