Peace In the General Forum

@fmf said
It was all just jocular: i.e. humorous. If you did not have the same sense of what a pseudonym should or should not have been or if you didn't just see it as the light-hearted non-malicious things that it was, then why didn't you PM me? And why did you use a local government email account to go directly to the radio station behind my back?

You had ignored my last two messages. We were not on good terms.

But you know all this.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You had ignored my last two messages. We were not on good terms.

But you know all this.

I did not ignore any PMs about the use of a spoonerism for a pseudonym so as to get two of your stories in the show.

-Removed-

Will inspect that tool for your fingerprints.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You had ignored my last two messages. We were not on good terms.

But you know all this.

If you'd PM'd me about it and said that it was affecting your health, giving you insomnia, affecting your work, and upsetting your family, and THEN I'd gone ahead with it anyway, now THAT might have been a bit malicious.

@fmf said
If you'd PM'd me about it and said that it was affecting your health, giving you insomnia, affecting your work, and upsetting your family, and THEN I'd gone ahead with it anyway, now THAT might have been a bit malicious.

Is this post a breach of the Data Protection Act?

@fmf said
I did not ignore any PMs about the use of a spoonerism for a pseudonym so as to get two of your stories in the show.

You ignored the previous 2 messages I sent you. (Deleted the last without responding). Why on Earth would I send you a third?

-Removed-

No, I didn't.

You really are out of the loop.

-Removed-

No worries Divegeester.
Your secret 2nd account is safe from discovery.
That's because it's not obvious.