Only Chess
06 Mar 08
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by RagnorakIts obvious that Znosko-Borovsky was cheater as genuine chess player would not write crap like that 😛
Just for it's comic value, this is what Znosko-Borovsky writes when trying to define a combination...
""The maneuvre is fine, ingenious and decisive, and every move is almost forced. But the element of surprise is lacking, and it is better not to classify this maneuvre among combinations, for otherwise we could not draw the line of demarcation between mane ...[text shortened]... nown air when made popular on the street-organs loses thereby much of it's charm" "
: D
Probably there were engines at the first part of 20th century 😀
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by MissOleumIts been in the Only Chess forum since the thread was started way back on the 6th March, why change it now?
This thread doesn't belong to Only Chess as it has no relevance to the game of chess. I think it should be moved to the Debates forum where differences of opinion are normally discussed.
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by MissOleumBut some people are discussing chess related stuff: the definition of combination.
This thread doesn't belong to Only Chess as it has no relevance to the game of chess. I think it should be moved to the Debates forum where differences of opinion are normally discussed.
By the same reasoning I suppose that threads that are discussing openings should be moved to debates too.
Or threads discussing game plans on middlegame positions...
25 Mar 08
2 edits
Originally posted by MissOleumClueless. "Discussion of differences of opinion" is not just done in Debates and is a ridiculous criterion to move a thread. The topic of this thread concerns chess and game moderation and even in the posts immediately above your own you can see people talking/jesting about chess.
This thread doesn't belong to Only Chess as it has no relevance to the game of chess. I think it should be moved to the Debates forum where differences of opinion are normally discussed.
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by Edam CheezzaThis post was made by me on my girls account...
But some people are discussing chess related stuff: the definition of combination.
By the same reasoning I suppose that threads that are discussing openings should be moved to debates too.
Or threads discussing game plans on middlegame positions...
Oopsie.
😳
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by Forum ModeratorAre cheating accusations admissible in the Debates Forum?
Cheating accusations, specifically naming users, are not acceptable in the forums.
PS: As far as I know, this post is not violating any of the forum rules, yet it keeps being modded. If this is modded again, I would like to ask the Moderator if it's possible to inform me by PM of which rule I'm breaking here. Thanks.
- Joined
- 05 Oct 05
- Moves
- 63425
25 Mar 08
Originally posted by PalynkaMaybe it was your 😵
Are cheating accusations admissible in the Debates Forum?
PS: As far as I know, this post is not violating any of the forum rules, yet it keeps being modded. If this is modded again, I would like to ask the Moderator if it's possible to inform me by PM of which rule I'm breaking here. Thanks.
🙄
