Go back
tell me why I should subscribe here

tell me why I should subscribe here

Only Chess

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
Can you refer to forum posts which would base your claim?
It's called the truth you ignorant slob.

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
It's called the truth you ignorant slob.
Your claims without reference to facts (in this case - forum posts) has zero value. If you cant base your claims on facts then you are liar.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
Can you refer to forum posts which would base your claim?
From page 1:

!~TONY~!: but for almost all of RHP, cheating is no problem, and is nothing to flip out about.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
05 Jul 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Perhaps you should tone down your anger as everyone here wants a cheat free site but I still feel the problem is overstated and this site is better than many and for most players below 2000 it simply isn't an issue unless they are unfortunate enough to meet an unbeaten cheat on the way up and those are easy to avoid.
page 2 of this thread.

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
From page 1:

!~TONY~!: but for almost all of RHP, cheating is no problem, and is nothing to flip out about.
Its not the same as (quoting eldragonfly) "the only "cheats" on this site are rated over 2000"

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
page 2 of this thread.
That statement does not say that (quoting yourself) "the only "cheats" on this site are rated over 2000"

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
05 Jul 08
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
That statement does not say that (quoting yourself) "the only "cheats" on this site are rated over 2000"
Korch it's simple, go to page 2 of this Thread 95994. No1marauder also pointed to a post that wrongly states that "cheating is not a problem." I find these statements to be rather absurd and tedious.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
That statement does not say that (quoting yourself) "the only "cheats" on this site are rated over 2000"
I was going to quote that one as well.

Nitpicking semantics aside, Korch, the quote certainly does suggest that cheating is confined to those rated over 2000 (unless those cheaters have just started). The reason why it would be a "problem" only to those over 2000 (Dragonfire) or to very few (!~TONY~!) is, presumably, because only higher rated players would have to play them. This is logical inference, but what else could these two posters mean?

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
Korch that you are functionally illiterate is not my problem. 😛
Your problem is lack of elementary knowledges in logic.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
05 Jul 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
Your problem is lack of elementary knowledges in logic.
And i have refuted your rather spurious statements and fruitless rebuttals korch.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

From Page 3:

Korch: But anyway I agree with you that cheating (with this term I mean violation of article 3(b) ) is serious problem in this site.

Apparently, !~TONY~! and DragonFire don't concur.

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I was going to quote that one as well.

Nitpicking semantics aside, Korch, the quote certainly does suggest that cheating is confined to those rated over 2000 (unless those cheaters have just started). The reason why it would be a "problem" only to those over 2000 (Dragonfire) or to very few (!~TONY~!) is, presumably, because only highe ...[text shortened]... ould have to play them. This is logical inference, but what else could these two posters mean?
I think that its not nit-picking as eldragonfly in his statement has deformed these statements attributing his opponents with opinion they have never stated.

In my opinion it`s big difference between "Cheating is actual for 2000+ players" and "Only 2000+ players are cheating"

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
From Page 3:

Korch: But anyway I agree with you that cheating (with this term I mean violation of article 3(b) ) is serious problem in this site.

Apparently, !~TONY~! and DragonFire don't concur.
How it`s related with eldragonfly try to attribute his opponents with opinion they have never stated?

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
And i have refuted your rather spurious statements and fruitless rebuttals korch.
Thanks for informing me and other readers of this thread. Otherwise probably nobody would know about that 😀

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
05 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
How it`s related with eldragonfly try to attribute his opponents with opinion they have never stated?
simple korch a cheater is a cheater, there is no magic boundary or magic number that engine users can't cross.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.