Originally posted by no1marauderActually I have read that post and although in my opinion no1marauder was too harsh, I should say that I did not see any cheating accusations or any other reason why that post should have be deleted.
Did you read the post? There was no accusation of cheating whatsoever though there was an accusation of incompetence and improper attitude for a Game Mod.
Originally posted by no1marauderi agree. This idea that there are few cheaters on this site is wishful thinking at best, and a dangerous and very incorrect assumption at worst.
The hypocrisy here is amazing; in response to your attack post, I posted a reply which while certainly critical of your attitudes and performance as a Game Mod was not offensive in ANY way. Mr. Forum Mod why was that post removed? What site rules did it violate? Or are only posts allowed which agree with the present (ineffectual) policies of the Site Admins?
I'm getting a little tired of this BS.
Originally posted by Dragon FireThere is no way you can prove such a thing, i find it hard to believe that you even made this statement. If anything the problem is vastly understated. 😠Totally ridiculous my man. Look... this is an excellent game site, but be honest just for one minute, it's a bigger and badder version of yahoo chess, thanks to the braindamaged masses who think that any form of cheating is the same as winning, and can't really fathom out what it takes to play real chess.
...Perhaps you should tone down your anger as everyone here wants a cheat free site but I still feel the problem is overstated and this site is better than many and for most players below 2000 it simply isn't an issue unless they are unfortunate enough to meet an unbeaten cheat on the way up and those are easy to avoid.
Originally posted by eldragonflyI`m afraid that your definition of cheating in this site will differ from definition of RHP admins and also from majority of RHP players.
There is no way you can prove such a thing, i find it hard to believe that you even made this statement. If anything the problem is vastly understated. 😠Totally ridiculous my man. Look... this is an excellent game site, but be honest just for one minute, it's a bigger and badder version of yahoo chess, thanks to the braindamaged masses who think that a ...[text shortened]... cheating is the same as winning, and can't really fathom out what it takes to play real chess.
But anyway I agree with you that cheating (with this term I mean violation of article 3(b) ) is serious problem in this site.
Originally posted by no1marauderCareful there no1marauder. Look at the incompetent eccentric sacregligous "types" that ended up as game mods, it's no secret why nothing got done.
About 90% of the people here disagree with your and !~TONY~!'s "Well, whadyya you going do" attitude if the community votes are any indication.
Originally posted by Korchuh-huh.
I`m afraid that your definition of cheating in this site will differ from definition of RHP admins and also from majority of RHP players.
But anyway I agree with you that cheating (with this term I mean violation of article 3(b) ) is serious problem in this site.
Nice try korch but totally irrelevant. My definition of cheating has nothing to do with the number of members on this site, and the number of cheaters.
Originally posted by eldragonflyYou can define whatever you want. but if you are unable to convince others to accept your definition then your definition are empty words.
uh-huh.
Nice try korch but totally irrelevant. My definition of cheating has nothing to do with the number of members on this site, and the number of cheaters.
Originally posted by Korchone more time korch my boy... the "pretended" site definition of cheating has absolutely nothing to do with the number of actual cheats on this site. 😞
You can define whatever you want. but if you are unable to convince others to accept your definition then your definition are empty words.
I don't think anyone outside the 5 game mods really understands what it's like to have to prove without a doubt that someone is a cheat. You can't just compare his games to any engine you choose and be like, "Well, these match up rates seem pretty damn high. Ban him." There's a lot of thought, a lot of math, and a lot of extra digging and work that needs to be done. And after that, you're still not sure. The cheater gives you no evidence but his games, and even with those, it's difficult to be sure that an engine played them and not a strong human. If Anand himself walked onto this site right now anonymously, I have no doubt in my mind that no1 would be convinced he's a complete cheat. And he'd be wrong.
Originally posted by eldragonflyI think that from your posts we have already understood that you are only clever person in this site and others dont understand your "obvious" truth 😀
one more time korch my boy... the "pretended" site definition of cheating has absolutely nothing to do with the number of actual cheats on this site. 😞