Originally posted by FMFI was never a staunch defender os vishva/Dasa.I'm a staunch defender of people having the right to express their views. Neither did I "turn on him" . If this is the way you percieve our (me and Dasa'a) interactions on here, you have misinterpretted my stance on our relationship.
One wonders why you tried to mock me for what I understand or what you assume I do not understand, what I have read or have not read. Why did you feel the need to frame my statement about myself as dishonest in some way or as something that "must be" a "joke" - and "not very funny"? This Forum is absolutely rife with this sort of petty egotistical stuff. As aval re dishonest! You must be joking! [/i] carping, as avalanchethecat rightly points out.
I condone a lot of peoples views, inlcuing utherpendragons a few posts ago. I condone the message and not any personal overtones.(Problem with that?)
I respect avalnchethecats views, as always, but am just trying to clear up any misunderstandings.
For example, if your assertion was not a joke, you need only the answer my question.
The truth will come out, (with me anyway), and you wont feel the need to be defensive about your position and you 'll find us (me and you), in a whole different place/space, where the "fear/intimidation thing" will no longer be a problem between us .(If it is not a problem already, just say so. It just means I'm a bit slow, as usual)
Originally posted by karoly aczelMe "defensive"? How so? I state that I understand the concept of reincarnation but because I see it differently from you, you say "you must be joking [...] and if it's not a joke it's not very funny". Surely it is you who is being "defensive" with this kind of attempted petty smack down? Are you so "defensive" about your own belief in the concept that those who have investigated it and rejected it must be mocked?
For example, if your assertion was not a joke, you need only the answer my question. The truth will come out, (with me anyway), and you wont feel the need to be defensive about your position and you 'll find us (me and you), in a whole different place/space, where the "fear/intimidation thing" will no longer be a problem between us .(If it is not a problem already, just say so. It just means I'm a bit slow, as usual)
Originally posted by FMFI'm a bit more apprehensive when posting to you at the moment. Yep, I'm a bit more defensive toward you , you could say that.
Me "defensive"? How so? I state that I understand the concept of reincarnation but because I see it differently from you, you say "you must be joking [...] and if it's not a joke it's not very funny". Surely it is you who is being "defensive" with this kind of attempted petty smack down? Are you so "defensive" about your own belief in the concept that those who have investigated it and rejected it must be mocked?
You just come across as defensive and nit-picky in your responses to Dasa and others .
You always ignore the majority of the positive stuff I write in my posts and focus on (what you consider to be) negative bits.
Post after post you offer not much in the way of actual "meat" for discussion. Most of your posts seem to consist of picking apart others' arguements. Especially Dasa's.
How about, in the spirit of spirituality, you look beyond the negative points and actually engage in some of Dasa'a questions on a hypothetical level?(like Agerg does) Could be a bit of fun?
Of course that is just a suggestion from someone who you must first anylize to see if their words have any merit. ( Thats right isn't it? You have to trust someone before you would seriously consider listening to what they have to say,right? _
edit: Of course what vishva/Dasa said to you about being a pig in his own stool (I forget the exact quote, but you know the one), was TOTALLY out of line in ANY post imo. He should've apologized for that one , without qualification, immediately.
That sort of language/behaviour is despicable by anyone and I noticed you have SEEMED a bit more ticked off since and been on a bit of a "Dasa hunt". All understandable from my view. I'd be ticked off too if someone spoke like that to me, especially given that he'd only just met you.
edit2: I should've backed you up on that point earlier, sorry about the delay
Originally posted by Hand of HecateSo true, and it doesn't matter whether one believes in a God or not to see that. 😉
I love you too sugar.
I'm just amazed at the Spirituality Forum Formula that has evolved. It's like watching the monkey house at the zoo. Everywhere you look you have monkeys throwing poop at each other and playing with themselves.
All this matter swirling around...
I guess there's a literal reincarnation. Material gets passed on and used for different functions and events. I mean, the matter that makes up you gets replaced every so often. All these letters get rearranged to make different meanings. Contexts and interpretations *yawn*
I guess your actions can set some ripples in the universal pond. Everything being a response to everything else, you can set up some conditions to have something accommodate it.
Now, I'm reincarnated as a chimp. I fling my feces because I think they smell better than the others' (and it is, considering my god ordained attitude, my divine will). I was a snail looking up at the mountain we all climb. Because I did good to others, I stand on my two legs.
Reincarnation/spiritual progression, why mess with the semantics? We're constantly changing- our ideals, our behaviors, our responses- and to break up the distinctions amongst lives is meaningless. Things are not so set into stone (and even if they were, stones wear away), this collection of atoms I call me is so temporary. There is a much bigger picture out there on the shoreline. Grains of sand fretting because we weren't directly aware of the rock we were grinded away from, and in fear of being turned into glass. I breathe the air of my ancestors and pump the blood of my descendants.
We're all in this together. We're all reincarnations of each other. The universe has manifested itself- it's material being used to come up with all these different things. Rocks, creatures, planets. Or all images of god's thought, whatever your style.
Originally posted by ua41Question: What percentage of people would have read that entire post (after they saw it was authoered by ua41)?
All this matter swirling around...
I guess there's a literal reincarnation. Material gets passed on and used for different functions and events. I mean, the matter that makes up you gets replaced every so often. All these letters get rearranged to make different meanings. Contexts and interpretations *yawn*
I guess your actions can set some ripples in the ...[text shortened]... things. Rocks, creatures, planets. Or all images of god's thought, whatever your style.
Out of the people who read it, what percentage (out of the posters in the last month) of poster would've read that post while keeping an open mind and truly considering,(in a positive,trtuthful light) the words that ua is trying to convey?
I reckon about 10-15% of readers can read that without putting their own bent on it before they even reach the end of the first sentence.
Originally posted by karoly aczelCan I butt in here....
I'm a bit more apprehensive when posting to you at the moment. Yep, I'm a bit more defensive toward you , you could say that.
You just come across as defensive and nit-picky in your responses to Dasa and others .
You always ignore the majority of the positive stuff I write in my posts and focus on (what you consider to be) negative bits.
Post after ...[text shortened]... .
edit2: I should've backed you up on that point earlier, sorry about the delay
FMF cleverly manipulates words, he,s a game player.........has been and always will be.
The quote about pigs eating their favourite food, is taken out of context as are many things I present.
I have even said sense pleasure is available to the hogs, dogs camels and asses....so why are humans so proud of their pleasure seeking and make it their life's ambition......so you can see that it is not personalizing anyone in particular, and the quote about the pig is of the same style and is not directed personally to a particular person.
FMF should apologize to you and myself for being an agitator and trouble maker.
In fact I am going to start a thread that will be a challenge to FMF .....to discuss spirituality/religion....and the whole forum can be witness to FMF,s games.
Originally posted by DasaI dont think anyone should have to apologize, except maybe you. Clearly FMF doesn't get your context, and in the spirit of charity and compassion an apology is in order to him for that remark.
Can I butt in here....
FMF cleverly manipulates words, he,s a game player.........has been and always will be.
The quote about pigs eating their favourite food, is taken out of context as are many things I present.
I have even said sense pleasure is available to the hogs, dogs camels and asses....so why are humans so proud of their pleasure seeking and ...[text shortened]... FMF .....to discuss spirituality/religion....and the whole forum can be witness to FMF,s games.
Good luck with your new thread...you're going to ned it 😉
Originally posted by karoly aczelClearly what? Will you please just speak for yourself and do not presume to speak for me or make assertions about what I do and what I don't "get". Dasa is not deep or difficult to comprehend. Dasa has compared me to "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy" for disagreeing with him and for raising the issue of his repeated and unapologetic plagiarism. What "context" justifies comparing me to "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy"? If I "get" the "context" then I will "get" why I am like "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy"? Is that it, karoly? Why are you making common cause with arguably this community's most disgraceful member?
Clearly FMF doesn't get your context, and in the spirit of charity and compassion an apology is in order to him for that remark.
Originally posted by karoly aczelI don't attack his beliefs. Nor do I attack yours. And I am not in the slightest bit "defensive" about my own spiritual path. I simply reject assertions made about me if and when they arise. Dasa's "spiritual path" seems to be a mixture of unattributed ideas he has found on the net [or in books] and internalized, hammered home with raw personal abuse and dreary condemnations of people he disagrees with on a Spirtuality Forum. You may rush to his aid here if you wish. People will make of it what they will.
You just come across as defensive and nit-picky in your responses to Dasa and others .
Originally posted by karoly aczelI ignore most of your posts quite deliberately. But I do focus on the ones that are directed at me or that seek to defend Dasa even though he is extraordinarily abusive and "intellectually" tyrannical.
You always ignore the majority of the positive stuff I write in my posts and focus on (what you consider to be) negative bits.
Post after post you offer not much in the way of actual "meat" for discussion. Most of your posts seem to consist of picking apart others' arguements. Especially Dasa's.
I started a thread about my spirituality and it ran for more or less 400 posts and attracted comment and question from many of this Forum's most interesting posters. You chose to ignore that thread, for all intents and purposes, so what is and what is not "meat" in your mind, is a matter for you and not me.
I don't recall "picking apart" any of what you refer to as Dasa's "arguments". Do you read my posts at all? As far as I am concerned he is free to believe what he wants and entertain whatever "arguments" he wants. I have not called him a liar and I have not abused or insulted him.
I have simply rejected his constant assertions that his belief system is also mine - "whether [I] like it or not, tough luck" - and his assertions that I am [and others are] being dishonest and fabricating nonsense when we do not accept what he says and submit to the same "authority" he submits to.
If you find Dasa's "arguments" full of "meat" that is fine. I have no reason to doubt your sincerity.
Originally posted by FMFIs there no end to your twisting words and meaning,
Clearly what? Will you please just speak for yourself and do not presume to speak for me or make assertions about what I do and what I don't "get". Dasa is not deep or difficult to comprehend. Dasa has compared me to "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy" for disagreeing with him and for raising the issue of his repeated and unapologetic plagiarism. What "conte ou making common cause with arguably this community's most disgraceful member?
From this........" a 7yr old child with SP can reject, its not difficult"
you have changed it to this...."I am like a 7yr old with SP"
If you do not subscribe to truthfulness then dont comment.
Originally posted by DasaThe question is, what on earth do you think you are doing comparing me to "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy" at all? What drives you to behave this way on a public forum?
Is there no end to your twisting words and meaning,
From this........" a 7yr old child with SP can reject, its no difficult"
you have changed it to this...."I am like a 7yr old with SP"
If you do not subscribe to truthfulness then dont comment.
you have changed it to this...."I am like a 7yr old with SP"
I have not changed anything. I have never said I am like a 7yr old with cerebral palsy. It is you who has made the comparison. And merely because I disagree with you about spiritual matters. Do you not have any ability whatsoever to reflect upon what you say to others?
Presumably an apology is not in the pipeline.
Originally posted by FMFEven this post is twisting words..............can you not make any comment at all without all the theatrics.
The question is, what on earth do you think you are doing comparing me to "a 7 yr old child with cerebral palsy" at all? What drives you to behave this way on a public forum?
[b]you have changed it to this...."I am like a 7yr old with SP"
I have not changed anything. I have never said I am like a 7yr old with cerebral palsy. It is you who has made the ...[text shortened]... ver to reflect upon what you say to others?
Presumably an apology is not in the pipeline.[/b]