Go back
Atheist Circular Reasoning

Atheist Circular Reasoning

Spirituality

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Do you have any compelling reason to believe that none of the gospels were written during the lifetime of the apostles?
I'm just going on the aggregate opinion of hundreds of scholars who have
made it their job to research such things so that you and I don't have to.

Of course you may have devoted your entire academic
life to dating the gospels in which case I apologise.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
04 Jun 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
I'm just going on the aggregate opinion of hundreds of scholars who have
made it their job to research such things so that you and I don't have to.

Of course you may have devoted your entire academic
life to dating the gospels in which case I apologise.
Your reasons for not believing the Gospels are most likely not intellectual at all. They are with the vested interest of protecting other areas of your life from what you perceive as God's interference.

The Good News to you has the effect of being Bad News for your conscience.

"The truth will make you free. But first it will piss you off."

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @sonship
Your reasons for not believing the Gospels are most likely not intellectual at all. They are with the vested interest of protecting other areas of your life from what you perceive as God's interference.

The [b]Good News
to you has the effect of being Bad News for your conscience.

"The truth will make you free. But first it will piss you off."
[/b]
An atheist isn't concerned with protecting himself from God's interference (In the same way he is not concerned with 'hedging his bets' ).

Why is this?.....Wait for it.......Atheists don't believe in God!!!

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
04 Jun 18
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
An atheist isn't concerned with protecting himself from God's interference (In the same way he is not concerned with 'hedging his bets' ).

Why is this?.....Wait for it.......Atheists don't believe in God!!!
Tell me how dirt eventually became a thinking mind with the ability to argue about God's non-existence.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @sonship to Wolfgang59
Your reasons for not believing the Gospels are most likely not intellectual at all. They are with the vested interest of protecting other areas of your life from what you perceive as God's interference.
Wouldn't wolfgang59 need to believe that your God actually exists first if he were to believe that this God was able/wanted to 'interfere' in areas of his life?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
04 Jun 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Better use of time imo -

Answering New Atheist Objections and Fallacies | John Lennox, PhD

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @sonship
Better use of time imo -
Is the dismissive posting of some video clip or other - one that presumably serves its confirmation bias purpose for you personally - a 'good' use of time, to your way of thinking, then?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
04 Jun 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @stellspalfie
Do you understand the motivations of those who believe in 'false' gods wishing to convince you that your god is false?
Nobody’s tried to convince me of that. And I’m not aware of attempts of that occurring to other Christians, at least not without threats of violence.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @sonship
Tell me how dirt eventually became a thinking mind with the ability to argue about God's non-existence.
It didn't.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
It didn't.
You don’t buy the theory of evolution either, that the beginning of life was single-called organisms and every living thing evolved from that?

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
04 Jun 18

Originally posted by @sonship
Tell me how dirt eventually became a thinking mind with the ability to argue about God's non-existence.
The first life on Earth probably appeared about 3.5 billion years ago; some of the earliest evidence comes from fossilised structures that formed on rocky shores and resemble microbial mats called stromatolites, which are still found on Earth today.

Almost from the moment of its origin, life began to influence – and be influenced 'BY' soil. For instance, those first microbial mats were built up from photosynthetic organisms, which could produce huge volumes of organic material using energy from the sun.

Chemists report today that a pair of simple compounds, which would have been abundant on early Earth, can give rise to a network of simple reactions that produce the three major classes of biomolecules—nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids—needed for the earliest form of life to get its start. Although the new work does not prove that this is how life started, it may eventually help explain one of the deepest mysteries in modern science.

Sutherland’s team argues that early Earth was a favorable setting for those reactions. HCN is abundant in comets, which rained down steadily for nearly the first several hundred million years of Earth’s history. The impacts would also have produced enough energy to synthesize HCN from hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen. Likewise, Sutherland says, H2S was thought to have been common on early Earth, as was the UV radiation that could drive the reactions and metal-containing minerals that could have catalyzed them.

That said, Sutherland cautions that the reactions that would have made each of the sets of building blocks are different enough from one another—requiring different metal catalysts, for example—that they likely would not have all occurred in the same location. Rather, he says, slight variations in chemistry and energy could have favored the creation of one set of building blocks over another, such as amino acids or lipids, in different places. “Rainwater would then wash these compounds into a common pool,” says Dave Deamer, an origin-of-life researcher at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who wasn’t affiliated with the research.

Could life have kindled in that common pool? That detail is almost certainly forever lost to history. But the idea and the “plausible chemistry” behind it is worth careful thought, Deamer says. Szostak agrees. “This general scenario raises many questions,” he says, “and I am sure that it will be debated for some time to come.”


http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/researchers-may-have-solved-origin-life-conundrum

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
05 Jun 18

Originally posted by @romans1009
You don’t buy the theory of evolution either, that the beginning of life was single-called organisms and every living thing evolved from that?
The Theory of Evolution describes natural selection and the origin of species.
It makes no claims about the origin of life.
It certainly doesn't talk about dirt.

You need to talk to a geologist, pedologist or edaphologist - they can all talk dirt.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
05 Jun 18

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
The Theory of Evolution describes natural selection and the origin of species.
It makes no claims about the origin of life.
It certainly doesn't talk about dirt.

You need to talk to a geologist, pedologist or edaphologist - they can all talk dirt.
Never said the theory of evolution proposed an explanation for the origin of life. But it does claim the first life form was single-celled organisms and everything else resulted from that. The theory’s total garbage.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
05 Jun 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Meanwhile:

'Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Then God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food”; and it was so.'

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
05 Jun 18

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Meanwhile:

'Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He ...[text shortened]... hat moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food”; and it was so.'
Thank you for posting the truth!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.