- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
31 May 18
2 edits
From the 2nd post on previous page. (Now the page before that. Page 14).
'EX 34:6-7, HE 9:27 God remembers sin, even when it has been forgiven.'
Apparently, I removed it,.....and then put it back. 🙄
Edit: Will Romans acknowledge his mistake? The heck he will.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
31 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:”
From the 2nd post on previous page. (Now the page before that. Page 14).
'EX 34:6-7, HE 9:27 God remembers sin, even when it has been forgiven.'
Apparently, I removed it,.....and then put it back. 🙄
(Hebrews 9:27)
How this has anything to do with God forgiving or not forgiving sin is beyond me.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeActually, I will. The Hebrews 9:27 citation was removed from the third post from the top on the previous page.
From the 2nd post on previous page. (Now the page before that. Page 14).
'EX 34:6-7, HE 9:27 God remembers sin, even when it has been forgiven.'
Apparently, I removed it,.....and then put it back. 🙄
Edit: Will Romans acknowledge his mistake? The heck he will.
Edit: And I pointed out the Hebrews citation was erroneous in the post that immediately followed it.
Do you deny removing the Hebrews citation from the third post on the top of the previous page after I called you out on it?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
31 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou removed the citation from the third post from the top on page 15 after I pointed out it was erroneous in the post that immediately followed it. I simply got the location wrong of where you did your devious and dishonest editing.
Readers will note that Romans will not admit his mistake and false claims. No surprise there.
Apparently, I have the superhuman ability to replace info into a post a day later.
(Again, STILL there, page 14, second post).
Do you deny removing the Hebrews citation from the third post from the top on page 15?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
31 May 18
Originally posted by @whodeyWell, Atheists apparently have the magical ability to edit posts a full 24 hours after they were made, so your lego talents are not so impressive. 😵
Atheists may do better at IQ tests but religious folk are far more talented at legos
http://godbricks.blogspot.com/2009/05/official-lego-sets-with-religious.html
Losers! ðŸ˜
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
31 May 18
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyOkay, Tom. Firstly, I asked, "If God is 'unchanging' why are sins forgiven and forgotten in one context and held against future generations in another (even though forgiven). I don't think you have really grasped that bull by the horns yet. As an example I quoted:
Does "visiting iniquity" mean refusing forgiveness at the time of judgment in the afterlife?
The sin, spanning over generations is referred to in some commentary as a generational curse. Likened to things we see current day that are passed on from parents to children. Child abuse, sexual abuse, addiction problems, etc. Not to say that an individual w ...[text shortened]... racter contradicts itself by "visiting iniquity" for some and forgiving individuals at judgment.
Jeremiah 31:34 "...for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more."
And EX 34:6-7, "...maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.”
'The above' is how God's character contradicts itself. - In regards to visiting iniquity, doesn't that relate to unrepentant sinners? And further isn't the idea discredited by passages reporting that "sons shall not be put to death for their fathers." etc etc
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
31 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou removed the citation from the third post from the top on page 15 after I pointed out it was erroneous in the post that immediately followed it. I simply got the location wrong of where you did your devious and dishonest editing.
Readers will note that Romans will not admit his mistake and false claims. No surprise there.
Apparently, I have the superhuman ability to replace info into a post a day later.
(Again, STILL there, page 14, second post).
Do you deny removing the Hebrews citation from the third post from the top on page 15?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeLOL!
As above.
You refuse to address whether you deviously and dishonestly removed the Hebrews citation from the third post from the top on page 15 after I spanked you because you know you did.
You got caught red-handed posting a Bible verse that had nothing to do with God forgetting or remembering sins because you were just mindlessly copy-and-pasting from an atheist website and passing the “work” off as your own.
Sad!
You’re busted!
Nice!
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeOnce again - and let’s all sing along - you removed the Hebrews citation from the third post from the top on page 15 after I pointed out it was erroneous in the post that immediately followed it. It was devious and dishonest editing and you got busted.
Well, Atheists apparently have the magical ability to edit posts a full 24 hours after they were made, so your lego talents are not so impressive. 😵
You refuse to say whether you removed the Hebrews citation from the third post from the top on page 15 because you know you did and got spanked because of it.
You’re busted, Heartpence!
Great!
31 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIt's like trying to impress your father who constantly rejects you.
Well, Atheists apparently have the magical ability to edit posts a full 24 hours after they were made, so your lego talents are not so impressive. 😵
Oh, the pain! 😞