Spirituality
28 Oct 12
02 Nov 12
Originally posted by wolfgang59The debate is also about culpability.
Why better?
This debate is about the value of life.
Killing another human being doesnt make things better.
This changes a state-sponsored killing from murder to punishment. Putting down evil is never murder.
I'm sure the victim's family, seeing the state provide for the murderer's every whim, is so glad that the state cares so much about life, even though the State's attitude about the victim is just "oh, that's too bad".
Would that the State showed even as much value for the victim as they show for the murderer (in states with no death penalty).
Originally posted by Suzianne
The debate is also about culpability.
This changes a state-sponsored killing from murder to punishment. Putting down evil is never murder.
I'm sure the victim's family, seeing the state provide for the murderer's every whim, is so glad that the state cares so much about life, even though the State's attitude about the victim is just "oh, that's too b uch value for the victim as they show for the murderer (in states with no death penalty).
I'm sure the victim's family, seeing the state provide for the murderer's every whim, is so glad that the state cares so much about life, even though the State's attitude about the victim is just "oh, that's too bad".
That you felt compelled to make such ridiculously false statements only demonstrates how utterly desperate you are to try to make a point.
Capital punishment is a leftover from barbaric times as is slavery. BOTH are condoned by the OT. Do you also condone both?
Originally posted by SuzianneThey don't lock the victim in a Super-max prison for the rest of his life. The victim's family's freedom far outweighs any handouts the murderer gets in the slammer.
The debate is also about culpability.
This changes a state-sponsored killing from murder to punishment. Putting down evil is never murder.
I'm sure the victim's family, seeing the state provide for the murderer's every whim, is so glad that the state cares so much about life, even though the State's attitude about the victim is just "oh, that's too b uch value for the victim as they show for the murderer (in states with no death penalty).
03 Nov 12
Originally posted by SwissGambitThe point is that the murderer should not get any handouts, but deserves to be tormented in Hell.
They don't lock the victim in a Super-max prison for the rest of his life. The victim's family's freedom far outweighs any handouts the murderer gets in the slammer.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou're also supporting capital punishment Suzianne? Would you be prepared to execute a murderer?
The debate is also about culpability.
This changes a state-sponsored killing from murder to punishment. Putting down evil is never murder.
I'm sure the victim's family, seeing the state provide for the murderer's every whim, is so glad that the state cares so much about life, even though the State's attitude about the victim is just "oh, that's too b ...[text shortened]... uch value for the victim as they show for the murderer (in states with no death penalty).
Originally posted by RJHindsCapital Punishment is not murder.
I think it might be because of your bizarre opinion that capital punishment is murder. 😏
Hopefully you have changed your mind now and no longer consider capital punishment murder.
Is that clear enough for you ... or do you want to mis-quote me again?
04 Nov 12
Originally posted by wolfgang59My misunderstanding. I am glad that you agree. I thought you were arguing against capital punishment, because you thought it was murder by the state government.
Capital Punishment is not murder.
Is that clear enough for you ... or do you want to mis-quote me again?