15 Dec 12
Originally posted by googlefudgeChrist has been repeatedly rejected generation to generation since the first love birds were booted out of the park, and ever since, by smart people like yourself and a very high percentage of all of the posters to this forum since it began. Who, I ask, would you nominate as having received more thumbs down in human history? Who (or is it, whom)? Please restate the earlier question you'd like me to comment on. Thank you.Mankind has regarded Christ as the pivotal and most controversial person since
(and even before recorded) history began and rejected Him at nearly every turn
Um no. Not even a little bit true.
JC was invented a little less than 2000 years ago.
Which is a lot more recent than the beginning of recorded history.
And even in the ...[text shortened]... l haven't Answered my questions from page 1 of this thread.
Would you like to have a go now?
-
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyDid you notice that I responded to your latest PM?
Christ has been repeatedly rejected generation to generation since the first love birds were booted out of the park, and ever since, by smart people like yourself and a very high percentage of all of the posters to this forum since it began. Who, I ask, would you nominate as having received more thumbs down in human history? Who (or is it, whom)? Please restate the earlier question you'd like me to comment on. Thank you.
-
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyOnce, twice and three times NONSENSE. People who think this way do not even understand their own book.
"Until a man changes his mind about Christ (the correct meaning of 'repent'😉, there is no hope of spiritual birth, eternal salvation and an eternal relationship with God forever in Heaven." (op) Mankind has regarded Christ as the pivotal and most controversial person since (and even before recorded) history began and rejected Him at nearly every turn. P ...[text shortened]... your persuasion but may be too timid or afraid to come in out of the cold. Thanks. (gb)
-
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
19 Dec 12
Originally posted by SuzianneYou believe in your god based on blind faith.
My faith is not blind. At least not in the way that you mean it, i.e. irrational.
As in you believe in your god without any evidence that justifies belief in your god and despite
evidence that indicates that you god doesn't exist.
Which is by definition Irrational.
And you have admitted as much, even lauded it, claiming that you were not supposed to have
any evidence because then you wouldn't be able to believe based on faith as you would then
have evidence and know.
You either believe in your god based on evidence. In which case I want to see it.
Or you believe in the absence of evidence or despite evidence to the contrary.
Which is by definition irrational.