Former Aologiest for Gay Theology

Originally posted by FMF
Have you got links to the 26 studies you mentioned?

No none were provided as far as i can discern.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I would consider the evidence, the circumstances and attempt to understand the reasons why it was perpetrated. I may also condemn the violence.

In what circumstance might you not condemn the violence that its perpetrator admitted to you. Would you condemn his hatred it if he professed it to you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No none were provided as far as i can discern.

So what "data" are you inviting us to refute?

Originally posted by FMF
So what "data" are you inviting us to refute?

the data contained in the video and logic that was used with regard to the content of the studies that were cited.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you think so, its not really a reflection of the experience people have in interacting with you?

Well, like I said, I have my detractors. I am sure some of them find me tedious. It's just par for the course on the internet. Perhaps they would find me tedious in real life, too. Who knows.

Originally posted by FMF
In what circumstance might you not condemn the violence that its perpetrator admitted to you. Would you condemn his hatred it if he professed it to you?

don't know, i tend to deal in empiricism, hypothetical scenarios and theoretical scenarios are not that helpful.

Originally posted by FMF
Well, like I said, I have my detractors. I am sure some of them find me tedious. It's just par for the course on the internet. Perhaps they would find me tedious in real life, too. Who knows.

what if you really are a tedious fellow?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the data contained in the video and logic that was used with regard to the content of the studies that were cited.

You believe that people can refute data supposedly taken from studies that are not available?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what if you really are a tedious fellow?

I don't see how it matters.

Originally posted by FMF
You believe that people can refute data supposedly taken from studies that are not available?

they can watch the video and refute the assertions that were made on the basis of studies that were not cited.

Originally posted by FMF
I don't see how it matters.

you don't think audience feedback is important?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you don't think audience feedback is important?

The kind of feedback I like best is what I gain from participating in discussions. I am not interested in people on the internet telling me I'm tedious over and over and over again. It just doesn't matter ~ regardless of how much time they devote to doing so.

Originally posted by FMF
You believe that people can refute data supposedly taken from studies that are not available?

after all either you have evidence that environmental factors have a huge impact on homosexual behavior or you do not, you don't need access to the lecturers studies to be able to refute the assertion, you could simply search for your own source of data.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
they can watch the video and refute the assertions that were made on the basis of studies that were not cited.

Where are the studies that the assertions are supposedly based on?

Originally posted by FMF
Where are the studies that the assertions are supposedly based on?

its clear that you have not watched the video. there are studies which reference the alleged biological factors for homosexuality some of whose authors are cited and there are studies which make reference to the environmental factors, i cannot recall if their authors are cited. watch the video and you will know.