353d
Love and hate are not necessarily one against the other as good and evil are. True unhypocritical love will always hate evil for the harm it does to the one loved. Always seeking the best for the one loved is always good, always seeking their best. It then becomes no surprise that God showed us His love for us while we were His enemies seeking our best. He laid down His life for us so we could be forgiven, showing us the greatest love one could show, by laying down His life for us. His love is genuine that it is given for the sake of us, for our good due to our need, God is love, it isn't just what He does, but who He is.
@kellyjay saidLet's define "evil" first so that the discourse has some foundation.
Love and hate are not necessarily one against the other as good and evil are. True unhypocritical love will always hate evil for the harm it does to the one loved. Always seeking the best for the one loved is always good, always seeking their best. It then becomes no surprise that God showed us His love for us while we were His enemies seeking our best. He laid down His li ...[text shortened]... he sake of us, for our good due to our need, God is love, it isn't just what He does, but who He is.
"Evil" is egregious immorality (as already defined in numerous previous discussions, involving doing harm, deceiving and coercing) and gratuitous, sociopathic action that is gravely detrimental and/or damaging to others, and which stems from an abject lack or even absence of empathy and compassion.
That's what I propose.
- Joined
- 14 Jan 19
- Moves
- 4279
353d
@kellyjay saidDid Jesus really lay down his life? Did he not say that he would only be gone for 3 days?
Love and hate are not necessarily one against the other as good and evil are. True unhypocritical love will always hate evil for the harm it does to the one loved. Always seeking the best for the one loved is always good, always seeking their best. It then becomes no surprise that God showed us His love for us while we were His enemies seeking our best. He laid down His li ...[text shortened]... he sake of us, for our good due to our need, God is love, it isn't just what He does, but who He is.
And if Jesus is God, according to the Trinity concept, why would God need to be so dramatic in the act of forgiveness?
What was forgiven in the act of laying down and resting for 3 days? All sins, past, present, and future? And if God created us, did he not create us with an inherent defect, one which disposes us to sin?
And what of the original sin? If man has been given freewill, supposing a will to choose between good and evil, then why prohibit man from having the knowledge of good and evil? To properly exercise the gift of freewill in choosing to be good or evil, is not knowledge of what is good and what isn't, necessary? Therefore, God should not have prohibited the symbolic first man and first woman from gaining the knowledge from the "damned" tree. I suspect God, the Father, sent out his children into the physical world to learn, the hard way, just how good we have it in the spiritual world, the Garden of Eden. As it's said, we do not know what we have until we lose it. By losing the body we know we have a soul?
I believe that Jesus, like Socrates, allowed themself to be executed so as to not appear to be hypocrites, by not be willing, personally, to live and die as they taught. Besides, both knew that the soul lives on after physical death.
- Joined
- 14 Jan 19
- Moves
- 4279
353d
@fmf saidIf I deceive you for your own good, is that evil? If I coerce you instead, again, for your own good, because I'm not able to persuade/deceive you, is that evil? If a surgeon damages your body by amputating a limb, to save the rest of the body, is that evil?
Let's define "evil" first so that the discourse has some foundation.
"Evil" is egregious immorality (as already defined in numerous previous discussions, involving doing harm, deceiving and coercing) and gratuitous, sociopathic action that is gravely detrimental and/or damaging to others, and which stems from an abject lack or even absence of empathy and compassion.
That's what I propose.
Is it not imperative to first have knowledge of what is truly evil, before choosing nouns and adjectives? Has nature any compassion for the weak, the sick, the needy? And for this lack of compassion, is the noun, nature, to be deemed evil? What of the good results from nature's lack of compassion which it seems to provide?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
353d
There is a fungus that exists purely to infect the brain of an ant. As it begins to impair the brain of the ant, it turns it into a zombie like state and causes it to climb to the highest point possible (perhaps the branch of a tree). A spore then shoots out of the ants brain, killing it naturally, before dropping further spores to the ground below, infecting more ants.
Is the fungus evil? Are the ants evil? Is nature evil? Is the creator of the fungus evil? Does evil even exist?
353d
@pettytalk saidProbably not.
If I coerce you instead, again, for your own good, because I'm not able to persuade/deceive you, is that evil?
353d
@pettytalk saidI wouldn't say so.
If a surgeon damages your body by amputating a limb, to save the rest of the body, is that evil?
353d
@pettytalk saidWell, we undergo socialization as communal beings. "Knowledge" in that sense?
Is it not imperative to first have knowledge of what is truly evil, before choosing nouns and adjectives?
With your reference to "choosing nouns and adjectives", I think perhaps you are trying a bit too hard to riff on two words I used.
353d
@pettytalk saidHumans acting in a morally sound way do.
Has nature any compassion for the weak, the sick, the needy?
353d
@pettytalk said"Nature" is neither good nor evil. Nor does it have or lack compassion.
What of the good results from nature's lack of compassion which it seems to provide?
@pettytalk saidWhat does "truly" mean in the way you use it here? "Very, very"?
Is it not imperative to first have knowledge of what is truly evil, before choosing nouns and adjectives?
353d
@pettytalk saidFor Jesus it was much more than His earthly life alone, He who knew no sin became sin, and bore the full wrath of God for all of us. Many of His who He saved, died instead of denying Him. Many earthly lives were given for Him out of love for Him.
Did Jesus really lay down his life? Did he not say that he would only be gone for 3 days?
And if Jesus is God, according to the Trinity concept, why would God need to be so dramatic in the act of forgiveness?
What was forgiven in the act of laying down and resting for 3 days? All sins, past, present, and future? And if God created us, did he not create us with an in ...[text shortened]... lly, to live and die as they taught. Besides, both knew that the soul lives on after physical death.
This is quite different from killing others to prove our devotion. We are given life a born again relationship in this life, not just the next.
Gods created a universe where real love is possible and for that to be true rejecting it must also be possible.
@PettyTalk
An interesting slew of questions, and yet, when I look back over them, they seem a bit disconnected from what I actually proposed in my first post on this thread.
It's OK to riff on words you see me using, but if it's just riffing for riffing's sake, it can come across like you didn't quite get what you are ostensibly responding to.