@divegeester saidNeedlessly referencing Relentless Red is a prime example of the toxicity you and your symbiont are plaguing the forums with recently. I've seen you both go after after some of the nicest people on the site with no valid reason for doing so.
Oh I see... it’s starting to feel like I’m talking to Relentless Pete with all your doubling down.
But what Duchess64 was responding to was me asking her if she had some examples of what she was accusing FMF of...did you think then that my question was unreasonable, inappropriate, “feeding” FMF in some way?
This thread is perfectly designed for you.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou really aren’t in good form are you, I suggest a good break from the forums where you can regroup and bulk up.
Needlessly referencing Relentless Red is a prime example of the toxicity you and your symbiont are plaguing the forums with recently. I've seen you both go after after some of the nicest people on the site with no valid reason for doing so.
This thread is perfectly designed for you.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDo you mean like you and Suzianne “going after” Very Rusty?
I've seen you both go after after some of the nicest people on the site with no valid reason for doing so.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’m sure, like duchess64 and her claims of me being morally reprehensible, you will have a portfolio of examples of these nicest people on the website being “gone after” by me?
I've seen you both go after after some of the nicest people on the site with no valid reason for doing so.
This is very odd behaviour by you.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNot sure if you are coming back to this pile of poo or if you are taking my well meant advice and having a break, but I thought I would remind you of the “alert” function available for every post where you see my “toxicity” “plaguing the forums”. You can also “send feedback” via the link at the foot of the page.
Needlessly referencing Relentless Red is a prime example of the toxicity you and your symbiont are plaguing the forums with recently.
All the best with it.
@divegeester saidHow are you faring with that honest self-criticism?
Not sure if you are coming back to this pile of poo or if you are taking my well meant advice and having a break, but I thought I would remind you of the “alert” function available for every post where you see my “toxicity” “plaguing the forums”. You can also “send feedback” via the link at the foot of the page.
All the best with it.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHow are you and Suzianne fairing with the morally reprehensible bullying of Very Rusty?
How are you faring with that honest self-criticism?
The ostracisation of one of the nicest people on the website is typical of the toxicity of you and your symbiont’s plaguing of the forums
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDo you ever have some honest self criticism of your angry, totally disproportionate, outburst against an entire radio program ... because your name was altered because you had two entries?
How are you faring with that honest self-criticism?
@divegeester saidLove this.
How are you and Suzianne fairing with the morally reprehensible bullying of Very Rusty?
The ostracisation of one of the nicest people on the website is typical of the toxicity of you and your symbiont’s plaguing of the forums
Please don't edit or delete. Let it sit there in all its glory in perpetuity.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe point is perfectly made, spelling errors or not.
Love this.
Please don't edit or delete. Let it sit there in all its glory in perpetuity.
As someone working in mental health, (well as a clerk anyway) and indeed not being in the best cognitive functioning order yourself, I would have thought you would have been more altruistic toward a dyslexic person.
@divegeester said🎯
Do you ever have some honest self criticism of your angry, totally disproportionate, outburst against an entire radio program ... because your name was altered because you had two entries?
@divegeester saidThere was no reference to your spelling. I was talking about you editing out your declaration that Rusty was was one of the nicest people on the site. (Obviously).
The point is perfectly made, spelling errors or not.
As someone working in mental health, (well as a clerk anyway) and indeed not being in the best cognitive functioning order yourself, I would have thought you would have been more altruistic toward a dyslexic person.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’m pleased that you picked up on the nuance that who the “nicest people on of the website” are, is a matter of pure subjectivity.
There was no reference to your spelling. I was talking about you editing out your declaration that Rusty was was one of the nicest people on the site. (Obviously).
But as you’ve chomped on the bait, let’s discuss then how you reconcile your bullying of Very Rusty as NOT being “toxic” because YOU don’t like him ...with accusing me of being toxic in my interactions with people whom you do approve of?
Maybe we could discuss that in the light of you siding with the most indiscriminately toxic poster on the entire website in order to demonstrate your wisdom and principle on the this issue of bullying and toxicity ...and why... because you used to like me but you don’t anymore.
@divegeester saidIt was a translucent carrot I chose not to munch.
I’m pleased that you picked up on the nuance that who the “nicest people on of the website” are, is a matter of pure subjectivity.
But as you’ve chomped on the bait, let’s discuss then how you reconcile your bullying of Very Rusty as NOT being “toxic” because YOU don’t like him ...with accusing me of being toxic in my interactions with people whom you do approve of?
...[text shortened]... this issue of bullying and toxicity ...and why... because you used to like me but you don’t anymore.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYour decision to avoid my points is noted.
It was a translucent carrot I chose not to munch.