Go back
Individualism & the human spirit

Individualism & the human spirit

Spirituality

Philokalia

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh no, I can't, I am just letting it flow.

Dive really, really wanted me to get onto this topic at some point and, honestly, his peskering is what brought this around.

This was a very popular theme.

I am sure even Marauder would love to be here right now.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
But, invariably, it is reflected in Korea's lower crime statistics and safety as well as general convenience livability.
You say the average IQ of the American caucasian is like 100, the avg IQ of the ethnic Korean is about 106. Do you think if that average fell 6 points from 106 to 100 that crime would go up?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
LOL, it doesn't work that way because if the average IQ o fthe American caucasian is like 100, the avg IQ of the ethnic Korean is about 106. This is not great enough of a difference to cause much or any measurable difference in what would amount to day to day life. But, invariably, it is reflected in Korea's lower crime statistics and safety as well as general convenience livability.
What's the average IQ in Indonesia and how does it correspond to the homicide rate (for instance) compared to IQ/homicide rate in Korea?

Philokalia

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
What's the average IQ in Indonesia and how does it correspond to the homicide rate (for instance) compared to IQ/homicide rate in Korea?
There would be a lot of variables for crime, and also I imagine that a place like Indonesia still has the Flynn effect being quite relevant. Meaning, that many elder people never had educational opportunities and thus it is likely that while they would score in the 80s this isn't a reflection of their actual capacity.

According to just one quick google, the average within Indonesia appears to be 89.

Low IQ correlates well with crime, and is a predictor; but there are other factors, such as poverty, and especially something like low time preference. Check out the studies on low time preference versus high time preference.

Of course, there are also environmental factors, too many to count.

But generally speaking, it is easy to predict that low IQ, low time preference, poverty and necessity will produce criminality.

What do you think? I'll not really respond to anymore questions because at this point this is just interrogation.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
Low IQ correlates well with crime, and is a predictor; but there are other factors, such as poverty, and especially something like low time preference. Check out the studies on low time preference versus high time preference.
OK, so I find that the average IQ in Indonesia is 87. You tell me the average IQ in Korea is 106. You also said that the higher IQ is "invariably" reflected in Korea's lower crime statistics. I see that the homicide rate in Indonesia with its IQ of 87 is 0.50 while the homicide rate in Korea with its IQ of 106 is 0.74. In what sense were you using the word "invariably"?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
There would be a lot of variables for crime, and also I imagine that a place like Indonesia still has the Flynn effect being quite relevant. Meaning, that many elder people never had educational opportunities and thus it is likely that while they would score in the 80s this isn't a reflection of their actual capacity.

According to just one quick googl ...[text shortened]... ? I'll not really respond to anymore questions because at this point this is just interrogation.
<According to just one quick google, the average within Indonesia appears to be 89.>

The average within Indonesia would be much lower - likely in the mid 70s - if FMF’s 600+ IQ did not make the average abnormally high.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
What do you think? I'll not really respond to anymore questions because at this point this is just interrogation.
Once again, I make the invitation: If you fancy addressing the OP and its specific framing of the idea of "individualism", you'd probably need to use the terms "participation", "obligation" and "public" and "citizenry" at least a few times, rather than ones like "individuality" or "individuation".

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
27 Feb 18

Originally posted by @fmf
OK, so I find that the average IQ in Indonesia is 87. You tell me the average IQ in Korea is 106. You also said that the higher IQ is "invariably" reflected in Korea's lower crime statistics. I see that the homicide rate in Indonesia with its IQ of 87 is 0.50 while the homicide rate in Korea with its IQ of 106 is 0.74. In what sense were you using the word "invariably"?
Surely you’re not suggesting homicide is the only crime committed in either country.

C’mon. You don’t need an IQ over 600 to spot the gaping hole in that argument.

Philokalia

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
OK, so I find that the average IQ in Indonesia is 87. You tell me the average IQ in Korea is 106. You also said that the higher IQ is "invariably" reflected in Korea's lower crime statistics. I see that the homicide rate in Indonesia with its IQ of 87 is 0.50 while the homicide rate in Korea with its IQ of 106 is 0.74. In what sense were you using the word "invariably"?
I'd say that the IQ of an Indonesian is not totally and accurately relfected by the tests because too many have been deprived of stimulation of the modernw orld and education. Like, I imagine Indoneisa in 1970 didn't have as many people actively attending school and interacting with difficult, modern labor tasks and thus there was not as high of an IQ, and even malnutrition could effect it.

But literally having a lower IQ due to deprivation does not actually mean that one is bereft of the mechanics and cognitive capabilities of a higher IQ (unless if it is literal mental development hindered due to malnutrition); it merely means that the mind was not routinely exercised at an early age to develop cognitive reasoning abilities useful in the standard IQ test.

These Indonesians probably still possess great abstract thought, ethical reasoning, and I imagine verbal IQs that belie their recorded IQ that is more reflective of geospatial reasoning (as all short, easy to perform IQ tests are).

How do you feel about this aspect of the answer? Basically, that they are a high IQ people deprived of some aspects due to the Flynn effect not taking full effect.

Another great example of this would be a place like India that now also has an avg. IQ of like 87 but, clearly, the Indian peoples who have gone to America and Britain are typically over achievers.

Philokalia

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'd also assume that the crime statistics that report the murder rate at that level have some other factors. Underreporting could be one. Or strict Islamic cultural influence.

IDK.

If you were to be honest, you'd know that my answer is that a lot of things affect crime and that only a low IQ correlates with it.

You simply did not fully understand what i meant by IQ perhaps because you are unfamiliar with the Flynn effect.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Once again, I make the invitation: If you fancy addressing the OP and its specific framing of the idea of "individualism", you'd probably need to use the terms "participation", "obligation" and "public" and "citizenry" at least a few times, rather than ones like "individuality" or "individuation".
I consider participation to be an obligation among the public citizenry and certainly would discourage individuality from becoming individuation among individuals not associated with the public citizenry or group dynamics necessary for participation to appear voluntary rather than a moral obligation.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
I'd say that the IQ of an Indonesian is not totally and accurately relfected by the tests because too many have been deprived of stimulation of the modernw orld and education. Like, I imagine Indoneisa in 1970 didn't have as many people actively attending school and interacting with difficult, modern labor tasks and thus there was not as high of an IQ, a ...[text shortened]... , clearly, the Indian peoples who have gone to America and Britain are typically over achievers.
And what about my question regarding homicide rates and about what the word "invariably" means when one uses it in the way you did?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Feb 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @philokalia
If you were to be honest, you'd know that my answer is that a lot of things affect crime and that only a low IQ correlates with it.
Why are you fixated on IQ and race do you think? Are the Koreans you live among fixated in the same way?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
27 Feb 18

Originally posted by @fmf
Why are you fixated on IQ and race do you think? Are the Koreans you live among fixated in the same way?
<Why are you fixated on IQ and race do you think?>

If he weren’t, this thread would have been put out of its misery 14 pages ago.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.