- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeOh, geez.
Every toolbox needs a hammer. The same can not be said for a damp sponge.
FMF’s gonna have to go over the basics again with you.
Originally posted by @romans1009This kind of retort is just not smart enough; but it is exactly the kind of thing fetchmyjunk and dj2becker have been saying for a year or more.
Relax, honey. I’m still busy but will pay attention to you soon.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfIt is very strange to wait for my reply then to go back and edit the living heck out of your post to make my subsequent reply look like it is entirely off base.
I don't really have one and I'm not really interested in the nuts and bolts of what you are going on about, as I said earlier on this thread. Thinking about things like the number of neurons people have in their brain from this country or that country is not relevant to my life.
What I am interested in - somewhat [I wouldn't want to overstate it] - is the e ...[text shortened]... ee fit. And feel free to simply ignore or misconstrue the extent to which I am interested in it.
I'll have to deal with this poor form later.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaI didn't.
It is very strange to wait for my reply then to go back and edit the living heck out of your post to make my subsequent reply look like it is entirely off base.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfThis is a really silly picture. I'd not even retaliate if I had the ability -- and, believe me, no one has the ability, because FMF rarely types on a single topic at this length. He holds hsi card close to his chest. Why is that?
I don't really have one and I'm not really interested in the nuts and bolts of what you are going on about, as I said earlier on this thread. Thinking about things like the number of neurons people have in their brain from this country or that country is not relevant to my life.
What I am interested in - somewhat [I wouldn't want to overstate it] - is the e ...[text shortened]... ee fit. And feel free to simply ignore or misconstrue the extent to which I am interested in it.
Because he is entirely disinterested in actually putting out content that others are free to interact with and have conclusions about. That'd be the only rational conclusion. No one actually knows who this guy is -- and that's the way he likes it.
This place is hsi little playground.
You didn't provide any kind of argument as to the content that I produce and you only reiterate that you've raised a few objections. Objections that did not accurately engage my content, heed you, because you do not understand the Flynn effect or much of what the topic means.
Instead, the most that you type involves drawing more on things not even relevant to this thread and rephrasing them in a way that you think is most damaging to me.
Very dishonest & dishonorable.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou can't actively deal with these things because there is not an abundance of new information coming out montly or even yearly. It also doesn't help that people like you -- with a maniacal loyalty to what you perceive as the good -- stand in the barrier of every potential good conversation.
I want to get into it because I believe you are racist, that you hold racist views. You were called out for it in debates and have been running away from your comments ever since.
You have stated that there are studies proposing that there are genetics differences across races and ethnic groups which drive IQ levels. You have stated in debates that y ...[text shortened]... page you say that you are no longer struggling to refute these studies.
So which is it Jacob?
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaI did no such thing. You are either mistaken or lying about what I posted.
It is very strange to wait for my reply then to go back and edit the living heck out of your post to make my subsequent reply look like it is entirely off base. I'll have to deal with this poor form later.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaI wrote about what interests me with regard to your race-IQ fixation. Everything I said was triggered by things you have said in posts. If you don't find my response relevant and want to say so now, that's your prerogative.
Instead, the most that you type involves drawing more on things not even relevant to this thread and rephrasing them in a way that you think is most damaging to me.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaLike I said, feel free to say whatever you want about race and IQ. And feel free to ignore any of my observations or questions.
And I can point it out again... What do we see? Content? No.
27 Feb 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaI addressed you and your racist posting and attitudes on page 24 of this thread and so far you have not replied to it because as usual you run away from being comforted by your distasteful beliefs. You strike me as someone who’s only experience of the Internet is one where you have been able to get away with your lame bleating about not being able to refute racist studies and here you have found yourself in a more rigorous environment of scrutiny and accountability - hence you changing your username from your naively original one of your actual real name.
And I can point it out again...
What do we see?
Content?
No.
Not from Dive, not from FMF.
It's like there is a conspiracy to avoid any actual dealings with the topic, lol.
I can see why FMF stays away from the Debate section.
27 Feb 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @philokaliaWhat you amusingly seem to be unaware of Jacob, is that you are the “content”...You are the bug in the jar.
Content?
Not from Dive, not from FMF.
28 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfYou call it a fixation as if it is a topic that I obsess over. It isn't at all. As I pointed out, it has only come up because it is Dive who obsesses with the fact that I might have an uncommon, un-PC position.
I wrote about what interests me with regard to your race-IQ fixation. Everything I said was triggered by things you have said in posts. If you don't find my response relevant and want to say so now, that's your prerogative.
This is a dishonest characterization.
I'd gone weeks avoiding talking about it until I simply assented to cover it in short.
You should take back this dishonest phrasing. It is very unbecoming to someone with an IQ of 600.
28 Feb 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterWhere's the rebuttal, DIVE?
I want to get into it because I believe you are racist, that you hold racist views. You were called out for it in debates and have been running away from your comments ever since.
You have stated that there are studies proposing that there are genetics differences across races and ethnic groups which drive IQ levels. You have stated in debates that y ...[text shortened]... page you say that you are no longer struggling to refute these studies.
So which is it Jacob?
You literally are just like... "Wait, so now you aren't struggling to refute this?"
This is a discussion? This is a debate? Really?
28 Feb 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterLOL.
What you amusingly seem to be unaware of Jacob, is that you are the “content”...You are the bug in the jar.
Right, let's not talk about ideas and have an actual discussion... LEt's gossip and talk about nothing and then pretend that we are furthering something.
No content. No bug. No jar.