Spirituality
16 Sep 23
20 Sep 23
@fmf saidYou say Suzianne is delusional for believing she encountered an angel and Dive is delusional for believing in angels. How are these any different? Both believe angels exist and therefore encountering one is a possibility. Neither have described meeting an angel that appeared in any way supernatural or with wings etc.
The "same delusion"? How so? How is it "the same"?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHere they are again:
I have said I don't agree with those claims.
1. divegeester is bribing Russ to delete accounts because those account users disagreed with him
2. I have deleted hundreds of subscribers' accounts because I am a secret mod and those subscribers disagreed with me
If she believes they are both true, then I would describe them as delusional claims.
The other possibility is that she simply made them up in order to have some kind of banter or 'line of attack'.
If she thinks these claims sound credible as 'lines of attack' and that sensible people will believe her, then I think she is ~ again ~ being delusional.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidFor the reason that I gave when it came upon before.
You say Suzianne is delusional for believing she encountered an angel and Dive is delusional for believing in angels. How are these any different?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAnother example would be if they both believe that Jesus Christ is still alive. Speaking as an atheist, I find that belief to be a delusion. If divegeester claimed that Jesus had come into his bedroom, sat on his bed, and talked to him, then I would find that even more delusional than simply having faith in Jesus "as the living saviour".
Both believe angels exist and therefore encountering one is a possibility. Neither have described meeting an angel that appeared in any way supernatural or with wings etc.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe two are interconnected but are delusions on different levels. I think you already accepted this, perhaps a bit inadvertently.
The two are inseparable.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidTo me, yes.
Dave believes in ghosts. Fred also believes in ghosts and believes he once encountered one. Is Fred more deluded than Dave?
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think you already accepted this, perhaps a bit inadvertently.
I disagree.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf Dave claimed he had actually interacted with a ghost, I'd find that more deluded than him simply having a general belief that ghosts exist.
But Dave has the same belief in ghosts and could just as easily misconstrue something to confirm his already held belief.