Spirituality
16 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI have simply typed "ghosts" instead of "angels" in a conversation where examples using ghosts and angels are being talked about at the same time.
As an aside, Duchess use to offer that same explanation.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAs I’ve told you several times there were no embellishments by myself. I have recounted them exactly as they were stated by Suzianne, and she hasn’t disputed any of them nor indeed has she specifically claimed I’ve said something incorrect; except for my use of “countless”. Which in fact she did use.
I avoided nothing. Many of the 'stories' you reference stem from a time before I was here, and which Suzianne has disputed. In what sense therefore am I to take them as 'her claims? ' - No doubt they are based on an original account but it doesn't take a rocket science to identify probable embellishments to make them sound more outlandish.
I am more than happy with my recounting of what she has claimed about herself.
20 Sep 23
@fmf saidYou ejected Dive from the bus of sanity when it suited you and abandoned him in the same bucket of delusion that you had put Suzianne in.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
By expressing different perspectives, people "abandon" each other? Is that what you mean?
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke said"Sanity"?
You ejected Dive from the bus of sanity when it suited you and abandoned him in the same bucket of delusion that you had put Suzianne in.
Where have I talked about questioning anyone's "sanity"?
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI haven’t said that she is delusional for insisting that she was about to buy a high powered sports motorcycle without having taken a lesson nor of course her bike test. I’ve claimed she was making it up.
Take, for example the buying of a motor cycle. I remember that discussion in the Ghost Chamber and am not really sure what you are going on about. So what if she said she was looking to buy a bike, even if she didn't have any experience. How does that render her delusional?
20 Sep 23
@divegeester saidNonsense. She has accused you of lying in your recollections on numerous occasions. You invariably reply, 'what lies? '
As I’ve told you several times there were no embellishments by myself. I have recounted them exactly as they were stated by Suzianne, and she hasn’t disputed any of them nor indeed has she specifically claimed I’ve said something incorrect; except for my use of “countless”. Which in fact she did use.
I am more than happy with my recounting of what she has claimed about herself.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidthe same bucket of delusion
You ejected Dive from the bus of sanity when it suited you and abandoned him in the same bucket of delusion that you had put Suzianne in.
You can try to disguise the fact that you have conceded there are levels of delusion all you want. It won't work.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou think the everyday English word "delusion" is a reference to insanity? Really?
When you refer to somebody as deluded.
20 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidOf course, I have described how there are different levels of delusion.
Not in the ways you have described here.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI agree that I am well aware that religious beliefs are considered by some to be deluded and I’ve also acknowledged that I myself sometimes wonder if I am therefore deluded in believing God.
Quite unexpectedly Dive appears to agree he is deluded.
Faith in a religious being is irrational and unscientific. I don’t claim to have an unshakeable faith and therefore if I were to conclude that I didn’t have faith I would by the above rationale have to acknowledge that I was deluded in once holding it.
My having to explain this to you indicates to me why you aren’t a highly educated mental health professional and after your 25 year career path are still operating in an administrative support role.