Go back
Literal vs Metaphor challenge

Literal vs Metaphor challenge

Spirituality

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock

-Removed-
You don’t know what it means but you know it doesn’t mean what it says!? This is knowledge you acquired how, or who taught you this?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
2 edits

Clock
1 edit

-Removed-
You have no plans on on answering me, instead this is how you respond? If you believe it doesn’t mean what it says there has to be cause, or are you just rejecting scripture because you don’t like it. If I am getting this wrong enlighten me.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock

-Removed-
No!
It’s not dishonest it is a valid question!
Are you going to answer now or accuse me more?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@thinkofone said
On top of that when He says if we show no mercy to others, we can except the same treatment He should lie about that?

Yet you support capital punishment. How is that not the epitome of "show[ing] no mercy"?

When you post statements like this, it underscores the incoherence and hypocrisy of your beliefs. It is a prime example of your intellectual dishonesty.
Let's see.

On one hand you wrote:
On top of that when He says if we show no mercy to others, we can except the same treatment He should lie about that?


On the other you support capital punishment which is the epitome of "show[ing] no mercy".

This underscores the incoherence and hypocrisy of your beliefs.

Since you are unable to reasonably defend the incoherence and hypocrisy of your beliefs, you've chosen to deflect. Which of course is yet another example of your intellectual dishonesty.

Clock

-Removed-
So not taking me at my word, and still not answering.
I think we can part ways here no going forward this way.

Clock

Clock
5 edits

@divegeester

How unfair of me? You never, ever said that you were scary.
What does the question "Are you running away?" suggest ?

Now answer me this which is more important.
Let's play it your way and remove any concept of fire from "the second death" or "eternal punishment". Let's assume all reference to fire is only allegorical and not literal.

Now that we have removed any concept of everlasting fire how does eternal separation from God appear more palatable to you ?

On what grounds do you now argue that no torment or suffering would then be involved with being separated from God forever?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock

@sonship said
@divegeester

How unfair of me? You never, ever said that you were scary.
What does the question "Are you running away?" suggest ?

Now answer me this which is more important.
Let's play it your way and remove any concept of fire from "the second death" or "eternal punishment". Let's assume all reference to fire is only allegorical and not literal.
...[text shortened]... now argue that no torment or suffering would then be involved with being separated from God forever?
Eternal separation would be in oblivion (nothingness) void of any torment or suffering. Why would your God favor eternal torment over this?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.