@divegeester
Hardy laughter will not get you off.
Bragging about what is hilarious will not get you off.
Bragging that no one answers you will not get you off.
"LOL" will not get you off.
Posing another question will not get you off.
Everybody, (I think) can notice that you WON'T respond either agreeing or disagreeing with the six Yes or Nos posed to you.
Come back to the six points about Rev. 1:1.
And instead of rattling off some cheap retort off the top of your head, take time and give it some thought and give us a reply with some substance.
This is not casual bar room chit chat over a frothy beer.
Give me your serious replies.
1.) It is literally a revelation of Jesus Christ. Yes or No?
2.) It is literal that God gave the revelation to Jesus Christ. Yes or No?
3.) It is literally for the showing of these things to His slaves. Yes or No?
4.) It literally concerns the things which must quickly take place. Yes or No?
5.) He literally made known by means of signs. Yes or No?
6.) It literally was sent by God's angel to God's slave John. Yes or No?
Divegeester please answer these six questions concerning verse 1 of Revelation.
Well ... ?
I'll be back latter in the day to see if you have some substance.
@sonship saidI count about 6 questions that Dive is dodging there...
@divegeesterIs the book of Revelation entirely literal, yes or no?
Well....
This is a trick question.
It is literal but many things are made known to us by signs.
[quote] The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to Him to show to His slaves the things that must quickly take place;and He made it known by signs, sending i ...[text shortened]... egeester please answer these six questions concerning verse 1 of Revelation.
Well ... ?
-Removed-Pick one, your question is meaningless to how I view scripture. The truth and points in the Word are there for us to glean what points God is trying to get us to understand. Nowhere at anytime in history did a prophet or anyone else demand we spend time on such a moronic quest in understanding the Word as you are now.
Why are you doing this now? Besides using this to avoid questions put to you.
@dj2becker saidI wonder why he goes after ThinkOfOne for something he does over and over?
Counter Measures: you answer a direct question with another question(s) with the intention of streering the laser-beamed question aimed at you...away from you and onto something sort of related but not as awkward.
I will answer any question you put to me once you have answered the original question in hand.
No you won't.
The question I just put to you shows that Revelation is both literal and made known by signs. The signs are symbolic. That is signs pointing to literal matters.
What is YOUR answer to YOUR OWN question ?