Originally posted by divegeesterIt's not a doctine. Your Bible says he is a God right? Did you read it?
ok ok relax. Geez!
Jesus is a God. According to you he is a mighty God.
I have found this thread to be most revealing of JW doctrine and your comments and revelations cement my view that the organisation is not related to the Christian church in any way.
Originally posted by galveston75Almighty God is the way the scriptures refers to the ONE GOD. It does not necessarily refer to a particular person within the Godhead. The belief is that the Word of God appeared first to Moses by the name YAH or Jehovah, as you like, in angelic form. Then finally in a more perfect representation and image of God by His only begotten Son, Yahshua (Jesus).
So was the angel Almighty God also just because he spoke for him? So is Jesus Almighty God just becauise he spoke for him and represented him?
Originally posted by galveston75No my Bible says he is Mighty God as yours does as you well know.
It's not a doctine. Your Bible says he is a God right? Did you read it?
You think Jesus is a God in addition to Jehovah; you can wrap it up any way you like Galveston, but that is paganism as much as in fact more than trinitarianism is.
Originally posted by RJHinds"Manifest" meaning 'customs document listing the contents put on a ship or plane' could be a reference to Noah's Ark.
True. People use words in the English language to mean a variety of things. However, that definition does not fit with a tranlation of the meaning of the Greek text.
Originally posted by divegeesterSo the Bible is pagan since it describes Jesus as a God? Ok, that's your viewpoint.
No my Bible says he is Mighty God as yours does as you well know.
You think Jesus is a God in addition to Jehovah; you can wrap it up any way you like Galveston, but that is paganism as much as in fact more than trinitarianism is.
Originally posted by galveston75Hang on. Not so fast. You slipped the word "representative" in there as if it is a synonym of "manifestation", when it is not. I fully understand that "representative" is the word you need for the purposes of your argument, but that need, in itself, does not create an additional meaning for a word. Why did neither of the links you offered use the word "representative"?
So if one looks at these meanings, it is never God that is actually there. It is a manifesitation or a representative of him being there.
Originally posted by RJHindsOh really? Could you show me a scrioture that explains that or is that just your idea?
Almighty God is the way the scriptures refers to the ONE GOD. It does not necessarily refer to a particular person within the Godhead. The belief is that the Word of God appeared first to Moses by the name YAH or Jehovah, as you like, in angelic form. Then finally in a more perfect representation and image of God by His only begotten Son, Yahshua (Jesus).
In fact can you show me any scriptues that prove what your saying in this post because I've never seen anything from the Bible that confirms any of this..........
23 Aug 12
Originally posted by galveston75This link and quote is about the Bahá'í Faith not Christianity.
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Manifestation+of+God
"The Manifestations of God are the only channel for humanity to know about God, and they act as perfect mirrors reflecting the attributes of God into the physical world."
Originally posted by galveston75You Holy Bible is not a book of proofs, but a book of faith.
Oh really? Could you show me a scrioture that explains that or is that just your idea?
In fact can you show me any scriptues that prove what your saying in this post because I've never seen anything from the Bible that confirms any of this..........