Originally posted by divegeesterYou're darn right I would. I would be spending my time making sure they're not going to be found wanting at Judgement.
Most of the Christians here claim that thier version of God does that to people. Most don't seem to be very disturbed by either, some almost to the point of being pathologically emotional dead. Hinds for example.
If I truly believed that my family, my friends, my neighbours, their neighbours and family were all in danger of being burnt alive for ete ...[text shortened]... arguing with the likes of me on this forum and get out and do something about it. Wouldn't you?
I don't know if you have to call God 'psychopathic' to make your point, though,
Originally posted by SuzianneGood we agree on something.
You're darn right I would. I would be spending my time making sure they're not going to be found wanting at Judgement.
I don't know if you have to call God 'psychopathic' to make your point, though,
I'm not calling God a psychopath, because the God I know and who knows me would NEVER do that to people. I'm directing at this "other Jesus" who is going to be a "spectator in hell" according to this bunch.
Originally posted by divegeesterI'm more interested in why anyone would think it's morally acceptable to engage in abhorrent behavior. Such as stalking and pestering people, and for no other reason than because of what they believe.
Aren't you interested in what circumstances RJHinds thinks that it is morally acceptable to burn people for what the do or don't believe?
I don't follow people around these boards for weeks and months at a time, and start up new threads for the purpose of harassing people whose beliefs appear abhorrent to me, so I'm just curious as to why you do.
But you didn't answer my question... do you (or do you not) think this is morally acceptable? Yes or no?
Originally posted by lemon limeI'm not the one who has said on these boards that there are certain circumstances under which it is acceptable to burn someone alive for what they do or don't believe. You don't seem to think that a Christian saying this awful thing on these boards is of any interest but my questioning them on it, is. That's a bit odd.
I'm more interested in why anyone would think it's morally acceptable to [b]engage in abhorrent behavior. Such as stalking and pestering people, and for no other reason than because of what they believe.
I don't follow people around these boards for weeks and months at a time, and start up new threads for the purpose of harassing people whose beli ...[text shortened]... didn't answer my question... do you (or do you not) think this is morally acceptable? Yes or no?[/b]
20 Jul 15
Originally posted by divegeesterHow would you rate your avoidance of answering my question?
I'm not the one who has said on these boards that there are certain circumstances under which it is acceptable to burn someone alive for what they do or don't believe. You don't seem to think that a Christian saying this awful thing on these boards is of any interest but my questioning them on it, is. That's a bit odd.
1.) as odd
2.) less odd
3.) more odd
4.) no comment
20 Jul 15
Originally posted by lemon limeI keep asking you this question and you keep avoid answering it. If you want to discuss any of the topics in threads in which we are both already posting please go ahead. Talking about you and your forum paranoia get old very quickly.
I understand the question, but in [b]your opinion what do trinitarians believe?
You need to do more than simply toss out a label and ask "Are you a [insert label]?"[/b]
20 Jul 15
Originally posted by divegeesterTalking about you and your forum paranoia get old very quickly.
I keep asking you this question and you keep avoid answering it. If you want to discuss any of the topics in threads in which we are both already posting please go ahead. Talking about you and your forum paranoia get old very quickly.
Then why do you do it? And why do you feel the need to call it "forum paranoia"?
20 Jul 15
Originally posted by lemon limeSonship started this thread to talk about hell and eternal suffering, would you like to discuss this topic at all?
[b]Talking about you and your forum paranoia get old very quickly.
Then why do you do it? And why do you feel the need to call it "forum paranoia"?[/b]
Originally posted by divegeesterHell is other people. For what terrible offence are you and Lemon Lime doomed to engage in fruitless debate about hell on this forum, potentially forever?
Sonship started this thread to talk about hell and eternal suffering, would you like to discuss this topic at all?
Originally posted by divegeesterSo you don't like those scriptures in which Jesus speaks of eternal punishment for the wicked and choose to ignore them or claim they are from another Jesus. Do you also choose to ignore the Creation of the heavens and the earth in 6 days resulting in an earth that is about 6000 years old today as Suzianne chooses to do because she does not like that idea. 😏
Good we agree on something.
I'm not calling God a psychopath, because the God I know and who knows me would NEVER do that to people. I'm directing at this "other Jesus" who is going to be a "spectator in hell" according to this bunch.
Originally posted by finneganThis is a debate forum about spirituality and this thread by sonship is about Hell. Anybody who is not interested in the topic is not compelled to read the thread.
Hell is other people. For what terrible offence are you and Lemon Lime doomed to engage in fruitless debate about hell on this forum, potentially forever?