Noah's Ark?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i have given my testimony in a sociological context, for its quite clear that humans can and are subdivided into these three major categories, your DNA method of invalidating this cannot be used, for like your vain attempt to discredit my theory, it simply relies on a different method as well. The theory appears to me to be self evident, considering ...[text shortened]... have explained, which one would expect if the biblical account was true, which it obviously is.

In other words - 'I can't'.

That was all i needed to know, and to be honest, i wasn't expecting anything different.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
In other words - 'I can't'.

That was all i needed to know, and to be honest, i wasn't expecting anything different.

i just did thankyou very much, and you have in no way invalidated my theory, all though your puny arrows and vain attempts were like trying to shoot peas from a peashooter at an F-22 Raptor! you shall need to do better than that dear Noob.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i just did thankyou very much, and you have in no way invalidated my theory, all though your puny arrows and vain attempts were like trying to shoot peas from a peashooter at an F-22 Raptor! you shall need to do better than that dear Noob.

It's your theory, you need to provide the evidence. I asked for some and all you did was produce a load of unsubstantiated waffle, pretty much the same as most of the so called 'evidence' that has been provided on this thread so far.

Much work has been done on mapping the history of the human race through DNA, as far as i understand there is zero evidence we descended from threes races 5,00yrs ago. But i could be wrong, and if you have any evidence to show me that i am wrong i would be most interested to read it.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
That sounds like a lovely theory, but to be honest i don't really understand what you're talking about!!

Could you back up this new fangled theory with any evidence though, if not, it doesn't really hold any water (pardon the pun).

Kind of like the Theory of Evolution? No evidence.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
How would you know it was the Ark? Does it have an identification code?

see i told you

Originally posted by galveston75
Kind of like the Theory of Evolution? No evidence.

Only in the mind of the fundamentalist!! But that's another thread.

So i take it you have no evidence for this theory of yours for me to cast my beady eye over?

Originally posted by RBHILL
see i told you

What have you told me?

Originally posted by RBHILL
see i told you

It's kind of like Pharaoh and the 10 plagues. He never once believed in God even with all he had seen with his own eyes. He was even arrogant enough to follow God's people into the Red Sea and die instead of admitting there was a God. So no, ones with hard hearts will never see the evidence that would ruin their ideas. It would also mean they would have to show humility which is so hard for some....

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Only in the mind of the fundamentalist!! But that's another thread.

So i take it you have no evidence for this theory of yours for me to cast my beady eye over?

Still working on it....

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It's your theory, you need to provide the evidence. I asked for some and all you did was produce a load of unsubstantiated waffle, pretty much the same as most of the so called 'evidence' that has been provided on this thread so far.

Much work has been done on mapping the history of the human race through DNA, as far as i understand there is zero evid ...[text shortened]... nd if you have any evidence to show me that i am wrong i would be most interested to read it.

unsubstantiated waffle? pluuueeeeze! the FACT of the matter remains, humans are divided into three major categories, Caucasian, Negroid and Mongoloid, based on characteristics. for example the native Americans, Inuit, the Lapps of Norway and northern Sweden, running all across the Arctic tundra, right across the Russian Urals into Siberia, Mongolia, China etc are the one and the same! The great races from sub-Saharan Africa, right the way through the continent are essentially one and the same, until one reaches the Mediterranean, and lastly we have the Caucasians, which include many dark skinned peoples, many in fact darker than the great Negroid people of Africa, like the Dravidian of south India and Sri Lanka, thus, it is quite clear that three distinctive branches of the one human family exist, as evidenced and observed! how could these three gene pools have arisen? that is correct, through direct descendancy from the sons of Noah and their wives, carefully and specifically well documented and recorded in Gods word the Bible! Evidence you say, take a look around you dear Noob!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
What have you told me?

he told you that if an angel make itself manifest, resurrect you from the dead and bring you to the very resting place of the ark, take your hand and lay it upon it, you would still dispute it!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Let's not forget, if your're a young earth creationist you have to account for all the dinosaurs on Noah's boat also.

And don't forget to calculate the rate of rainfall necessary to cover the highest mountains in 40 days and nights.

Originally posted by galveston75
It's kind of like Pharaoh and the 10 plagues. He never once believed in God even with all he had seen with his own eyes. He was even arrogant enough to follow God's people into the Red Sea and die instead of admitting there was a God. So no, ones with hard hearts will never see the evidence that would ruin their ideas. It would also mean they would have to show humility which is so hard for some....

Pharaoh chased the Hebrew criminals into the desert because they had pillaged a city on the way out of Egypt. The Egyptians were prodigious recordkeepers and the story of the Hebrews crime was found by archaeologists.

Originally posted by RBHILL
even if the ark was found the athiest still would not believe in God.

Even as science has proven that no where near the diversity of species would exist was this folk tale even remotely accurate creationists still refuse to believe what stares them in the face. Ut-Napishtm is spinning (and laughing) in his grave.

Originally posted by caissad4
And don't forget to calculate the rate of rainfall necessary to cover the highest mountains in 40 days and nights.

Have you not been following the other post? The mountains we not near the height they were now as all mountain ranges have ocean fossils on them as the were once under water?. The evidence is there but it seems no one wants to see it. Maybe you can't!!