Originally posted by @eladarIt seems that the Jews thought he was a blasphemer ~ Jesus asserted His deity unequivocally according to Mark 14:62, so Christians don't even dispute it ~ and they believed they had grounds to execute him. Did he mention "God" when he was asserting his deity? It would seem so. I reckon the legal notion that those "who blaspheme the Name of the LORD must be put to death" has got it covered.
All blasphemy was not grounds for execution, unless you know of some other scripture.
06 Jan 18
Originally posted by @fmfAccording to the Bible they did not wish to kill Jesus because he was popular.
It seems that the Jews thought he was a blasphemer ~ Jesus asserted His deity unequivocally according to Mark 14:62, so Christians don't even dispute it ~ and they believed they had grounds to execute him. Did he mention "God" when he was asserting his deity? It would seem so. I reckon the legal notion that those "who blaspheme the Name of the LORD must be put to death" has got it covered.
The charges brought against him was leading a rebellion. Jesus was found not guilty but Pilot executed Jesus anyhow.
No charges of blasphemy.
06 Jan 18
Originally posted by @fmfNot at all, not that you would see it.
Yes. So it would seem.
What we have are men wanting their way.
The blasphemy death penalty is still in effect today in the form of the unforgivable sin.
Not that you really need to cate about that at the moment since you evidently are not forgiven for anything.
Originally posted by @eladarOh the shoe is now on the other foot, and it’s your turn to dial back on the severity of the due penalty. Why bother? Didn’t you read where the Sanhedrin complained to Pilate that they didn’t have the right under Roman law to execute Jesus without Pilate’s consent? Clearly they believed he had earned the Mosaic law death penalty for blasphemy.
All blasphemy was not grounds for execution, unless you know of some other scripture.
06 Jan 18
Originally posted by @js357You really are dense.
Oh the shoe is now on the other foot, and it’s your turn to dial back on the severity of the due penalty. Why bother? Didn’t you read where the Sanhedrin complained to Pilate that they didn’t have the right under Roman law to execute Jesus without Pilate’s consent? Clearly they believed he had earned the Mosaic law death penalty for blasphemy.
Tell me exactly what kind of blasphemy is punished by death according to the law.
Then tell me what kinds of sexual relations are punishable by death penalty.
Whose laws are we discussing? OT, NT, Christian, Roman? Present day? And who is subject to them? Jews, Roman Citizens, Roman subjects, Christians? Present day?
OT: Anal penetration.
NT: Jews, Christians: Defers to Roman law.
Subject Jews, Christians under Sanhedrin:
OT rule. Requires Roman governor agreement for capital crimes.
06 Jan 18
Originally posted by @js357I am sure that is the way you see it.
Whose laws are we discussing? OT, NT, Christian, Roman? Present day? And who is subject to them? Jews, Roman Citizens, Roman subjects, Christians? Present day?
OT: Anal penetration.
NT: Jews, Christians: Defers to Roman law.
Subject Jews, Christians under Sanhedrin:
OT rule. Requires Roman governor agreement for capital crimes.