Panspermia

Originally posted by twhitehead
Well you certainly have me lost. I don't know which 'star trek thing' you are referring to that is a weird anomaly. Its only weird if you believe that the screen writers we being dictated to by aliens.

[b]I just wanted to alert the general community to the extra-terrestrial presence that now surrounds us. It is hard to know where to start with such an ...[text shortened]... ect you to read the whole thing, but how about just one section?
I'll go have a look.[/b]

1.The screen writer had a dream that was 'implanted' by an outside agency.The screen writer in this sense is still choosing the material and is not being dictated to.
2.I could be a madman. Either way it couldn't hurt to look . Like checking out crop circles. Pretty interesting subject to me.
3.Cool. No rush.🙂

Originally posted by daniel58
No like I said before, Adam and Eve WERE on Earth just a different part.

no they were not the garden would be known if it were, as a angel stands gaurd not allowing we to re-enter, and we do not see it, and if it were of this world we would, it maybe hidden like heaven which is but its not of this world,
like jesus said if his kingdom were of this world his troups would have stopped his death.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
1.The screen writer had a dream that was 'implanted' by an outside agency.The screen writer in this sense is still choosing the material and is not being dictated to.

Well the only weird anomaly there is that you believe it. You can hardly present that as evidence that weird anomalies are taking place and an unprecidended level.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Well the only weird anomaly there is that you believe it. You can hardly present that as evidence that weird anomalies are taking place and an unprecidended level.

I resonate with it. I wouldn'y say I believe it. This 'resonation' should mean different things at different times. I guess the major difference for me between 'resonating' with something and 'believing' in it is my reaction to it. My reaction to 'resonating' with something is generally more passive than the latter. But thats just me.

Originally posted by stoker
no they were not the garden would be known if it were, as a angel stands gaurd not allowing we to re-enter, and we do not see it, and if it were of this world we would, it maybe hidden like heaven which is but its not of this world,
like jesus said if his kingdom were of this world his troups would have stopped his death.

Yes they were God created the world and put Adam and Eve in it, IN THE GARDEN, then God cast them out into the world OUSIDE the garden, it could be that God is hiding the garden from human eyes.

Originally posted by daniel58
Yes they were God created the world and put Adam and Eve in it, IN THE GARDEN, then God cast them out into the world OUSIDE the garden, it could be that God is hiding the garden from human eyes.

god created the world, yes. it could be hiding the garden from our eyes, but that is more sunday school teaching to help young minds. but like heaven its not of this world, cast DOWN to earth. nothing of this earth is hidden, only the world to come

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Intuition on one hand and logic deduced from available evidence.

and what availeble evidence are we talking about?

Originally posted by generalissimo
and what availeble evidence are we talking about?

What evidence? I look all around and I see evidence everywhere that the human hasn't evolved quite the same way as other mammals.

Look at the huge amount of division on the rhp forums alone.
Look at the christians and other religous types. Are they all fools?
What does this mean? Means we dont know exactly what happened in early human history. And I think everyone, on some level, is trying to find out.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Look at the huge amount of division on the rhp forums alone.
Look at the christians and other religous types. Are they all fools?
What does this mean? Means we dont know exactly what happened in early human history. And I think everyone, on some level, is trying to find out.

Clearly not everyone knows what happened (as there is disagreement), but it doesn't mean that nobody does. I don't claim to know every detail, but I think I have a pretty good idea, and that there is sufficient scientific evidence to back up what I think happened.
I don't believe that everyone is on some level trying to find out, if anything, most people don't really care. I find history an interesting subject but it is hardly top of the list.

Originally posted by David C
Panspermia suggests that some sort of proto-genetic material entered our environment via a passing comet or colliding meteor, mixing with elements already on earth, thereby creating the new molecular structures that eventually became "life". Where did you get the idea that Panspermia theory entails that "aliens" seeded the Earth? Been watching re-runs of the X-Files?

Yeap, no aliens required -check amongst else http://www.silobreaker.com/wild-2-comet-discovered-with-building-block-of-life--evidence-of-life-5_2262537948111044637
😵

Originally posted by karoly aczel
1.The screen writer had a dream that was 'implanted' by an outside agency.The screen writer in this sense is still choosing the material and is not being dictated to.
2.I could be a madman. Either way it couldn't hurt to look . Like checking out crop circles. Pretty interesting subject to me.
3.Cool. No rush.🙂

There is no evidence to suggest at all that crop cirlces are the result of aliens, but massive amounts of evidence indicating they are man made. ie people owning up to them.

You still are yet to prduce any evidence regarding any of your assertions.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
There is no evidence to suggest at all that crop cirlces are the result of aliens, but massive amounts of evidence indicating they are man made. ie people owning up to them.

You still are yet to prduce any evidence regarding any of your assertions.

will you also suggest that the Loch Ness monster is not real, the last living dragon, when countless persons have testified to its reality and play the variation in its honour?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
will you also suggest that the Loch Ness monster is not real, the last living dragon, when countless persons have testified to its reality and play the variation in its honour?

Define the Loch Ness monster for me and i'll tell you what i think.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Define the Loch Ness monster for me and i'll tell you what i think.

mmm, well its like a dragon, you know, long neck, breathes fire, scaly skin, large talons for clutching helpless maidens from off the sacrificial rock etc etc

Originally posted by karoly aczel
What evidence? I look all around and I see evidence everywhere that the human hasn't evolved quite the same way as other mammals.

Look at the huge amount of division on the rhp forums alone.
Look at the christians and other religous types. Are they all fools?
What does this mean? Means we dont know exactly what happened in early human history. And I think everyone, on some level, is trying to find out.

And every other mammal has not evolved quite the same way as every other mammal, the humans included. So what? Why should we have to replace the irrational religious concept of "god" with the irrational religious concept of "alliens that they designed the human race"?

Furthermore, the diversity of the opinions of the human beings is normal because every opinion represents the very way that each human being is collapsing the wavefunction and understands her/ his personal truth herenow, which it is as unique as our fingerprints. I think that this diversity itself regarding the miscellaneous religious beleifs means absolutely nothing, because every religious belief is not a result of science/ philosophy/ common sens but a result of blind faith at its core -this is what theology is all about. Therefore I cannot understand why you ask whether or not the Christians and the other theist friends of ours are fool, although I have the feeling that their core beleifs are lacking of scientific and philosophic back up.

And, why you claim that we ignore what happened in early human history? We do not know everything in detail, however bit by bit we construct and enhance accurately this huge puzzle by means of scientific finds and evidence and philosophy -and this procedure is fine with me😵