14 Dec 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterI do not deny the existence of God.
It’s funny that you say this because this is exactly how I see you.
Originally posted by @divegeesterI never realised.
I am Lord Humongous, the Warrior of the wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla.
Give me what I want I will spare your puny life.
Will bitcoins be ok?
Originally posted by @wolfgang59Nor did Fetchmybecker 😵
I never realised.
Will bitcoins be ok?
14 Dec 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterI did realize that you too have a vivid imagination. Must be in the genes. 😉
Nor did Fetchmybecker 😵
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNeither do a lot of us that you call atheists. We just happen to lack belief that any such exists.
I do not deny the existence of God.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou have a potential point, but you couched it in garbage.
It might dawn upon you at some point in time that people who reject the existence of God become of 'god' of their own little universe. They may not be aware of it but it's quite obvious to those that are able to observe such things.
If there is a thing, lets say a rock, so there is a rock. It's in the trail, let's say, so you are walking down the trail and lo! there is a rock. You can stub your toe or step over it or find another trail to walk on, but the rock is real. I can feel it, I can show it to you, and you can stub your toe too.
But the God thing is only in your head. It's not on any trail, it is not actually in this world, you cannot show it to anyone and it is exactly as if it has no existence other than in your head.
bryan steeksma
won't you listen to reason
open your eyes
14 Dec 17
Originally posted by @wolfgang59I meant as to the topic of this thread.
that the nth line shows the coefficients in the expansion of (a+b)^n
he said some other stuff too
14 Dec 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterYour ignorance is obvious for all to see.
Yes, more than you it seems,
From wiki
Pascal's Wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, mathematician and physicist Blaise Pascal (1623–62).[1] It posits that humans bet with their lives that God either exists or does not.
Pascal argues that a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss (some pleasures, luxury, etc.), whereas they stand to receive infinite gains (as represented by eternity in Heaven) and avoid infinite losses (eternity in Hell).[2]
Originally posted by @divegeesterAFAIK, 0 theists have credited Pascal's Wager as the reason for their belief. It's always something they want other people to do.
Pascal’s wager was one of Grammy Bobby’s favourite turn-keys in religious debate. Like Pascal (in his thought experiment), he maintained that simply choosing to believe in god was something the intellectual mind could do, whereas in the reality of the Christian spiritual experience, “belief” is a outcome of faith and faith is given not switched on.
...[text shortened]... , for in doing so the proponent displays abject dismissal of the spiritual energy that is faith.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemI couldn't care less about what you believe nor the reward you will recieve.
AFAIK, 0 theists have credited Pascal's Wager as the reason for their belief. It's always something they want other people to do.