Originally posted by @divegeesterI don't care how simple the question is Divegeester.
It’s a simple question hanging on your vanity sonship, a simple question you cannot give a simple answer to.
You seem to think everything hinges on how simple the question is.
Get some new tricks.
Some questions are answered with "Not necessarily" -
about conversant discussion of the nature of God and salvation.
Now you're going to tell us why YOUR opinion should be held in higher regard by us than the word of God in Luke 12:5.
Work on that.
26 Jun 18
Originally posted by @sonshipThe issue in play is your vanity old chap.
I don't care how simple the question is Divegeester.
You seem to think it hinges on how simple the question is.
Get some new tricks.
Some questions are answered with "Not necessarily."
Now you're going to tell us why YOUR opinion should be held in higher regard to the word of God in [b]Luke 12:5)
Work on that.[/b]
I reject your teachings.. trinity rejected....eternal suffering...rejected.
I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and saviour though.
Is this scenario ok with you sonship?
Originally posted by @divegeester
The issue in play is your vanity old chap.
Old chap, the weakness of your position grows concurrently with the frequency of your ad homs.
Is being, like bar room folksy and wrong suppose to be safer ?
I reject your teachings.. trinity rejected....eternal suffering...rejected.
So you reject the triune nature of God and reject Luke 12:5 even though you admit God said it.
What do you want me to do? Plenty of people reject these things. That's their prerogative to disbelieve something in the Scriptures.
You're waiting for me to fall apart about that ?
BUT I'm SAVED AND I DISAGREE WITH YOU SONSHIP !!!
Okay.
Why wait for me to fall apart about that ??
I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and saviour though.
Wonderful.
Am I suppose to fall apart about that ?
Am I suppose to go whining to God because you're confused about some passages but have come to confess Jesus as Lord and believe that God raised Him from the dead ?
Oh, maybe I'm suppose to say "WELL THEN ... its not IMPORTANT about the nature of God being three-one."
Sure God's nature is important even though He didn't demand you be conversant on the subject before you received Christ.
Romans 10:9 seems clear enough.
Is this scenario ok with you sonship?
Yes.
Sounds like yourself is the one you're desperate to convince rather than me.
Is it alright with YOU that I don't reject the three-one mystery of the Father - Son - Holy Spirit?
Is it alright with YOU that I take Luke 12:5 as God's word OVER your annhilationist diatribes against the New Testament ?
Lest we soon forget.
You heard it here from Divegeester people. This is the word of God. Jesus taught this with HIS words. Nobody added it in latter because they were mean guys wanting to scare everybody.
"But I will show you whom you should fear, fear Him who after killing, has the authority to cast into Gehenna,
yes, I tell you, fear this One." (Luke 12:5)
Originally posted by @sonshipAre the words of Jesus in the bible any more valid and authoritative than the words of John in revelation or of Isaiah in the OT?
Lest we soon forget.
You heard it here from Divegeester people. This is the word of [b]God. Jesus taught this with HIS words. Nobody added it in latter because they were mean guys wanting to scare everybody.
"But I will show you whom you should fear, fear Him who after killing, has the authority to cast into Gehenna,[/b]
yes, I tell you, fear this One." (Luke 12:5)
If not then why do you keep going on about “the words of Jesus”; you sound like thinkofone...
Let me know I’d be interested in this one...
26 Jun 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterI believe what the scripture says and that without belittling God.
You believe in a monsterous version of a torturing god, I don’t.
Simple.
Originally posted by @kellyjayThat you actually believe (or at least use the phrase as an insult) that I would belittle God, is an interesting revalation into why we consistently fail to agree on virtually anything.
I believe what the scripture says and that without belittling God.
Originally posted by @divegeesterSo you think the God of the Bible is a torturing monster?
You believe in a monsterous version of a torturing god, I don’t.
Simple.
Now you'll say, "no, I believe sonship's God is a torturing monster".
Sad that you should choose to interpret the scriptures and not let them say what they say. Instead you spiritulize the words to agree with you. You're in for a rude awakening.
Originally posted by @secondsonWhat is sad SecondSon, is that you can’t see past my defence of the moral reputation of my Lord, to the militant supporter of the gospel Jesus Christ that I am.
So you think the God of the Bible is a torturing monster?
Now you'll say, "no, I believe sonship's God is a torturing monster".
Sad that you should choose to interpret the scriptures and not let them say what they say. Instead you spiritulize the words to agree with you. You're in for a rude awakening.
Originally posted by @divegeesterWell you are not addressing the point of contention which is scripture and how it is worded. Instead I see name calling towards God, due to the Word of God.
That you actually believe (or at least use the phrase as an insult) that I would belittle God, is an interesting revalation into why we consistently fail to agree on virtually anything.
Originally posted by @divegeester
is that you can’t see past my defence of the moral reputation of my Lord, to the militant supporter of the gospel Jesus Christ that I am.
Did Christ's "moral reputation" begin to suffer negatively when He uttered these words, WHICH YOU ADMITTED were put into His mouth by God ?
" But I will show you whom you should fear, fear Him who after killing, has the authority to cast into Gehenna,
yes, I tell you, fear this One." (Luke 12:5)
Remember, you're the poster who usually unequivocally and immediately answers questions put to you.
Originally posted by @divegeesterI also politely refer you to your post!
I politely refer you to my post above.