18 Aug 14
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterI've already answered your question about trees earlier in this thread, and you ignored my answer. Do you want (or need) me to copy and paste it for you so that you can see it again?
LemonLime, the concept of debating on these boards is that you read the correspondents posts before replying, that way you tend too look less of a twit on the internet.
It's no trouble, copy and pasting messages in the same thread is much easier than writing those answers for the first time... but the question on my mind is, will you ignore it again?
18 Aug 14
1 edit
Originally posted by lemon limeYou said: "What question? Reposted where? "
I've already answered your question about trees earlier in this thread, and you ignored my answer. Do you want (or need) me to copy and paste it for you so that you can see it again?
It's no trouble, copy and pasting messages in the same thread is much easier than writing those answers for the first time... but the question on my mind is, will you ignore it again?
Before we proceed, have you now managed to locate the question I posted twice which you were having trouble finding?
18 Aug 14
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterIt wasn't a question, it was a challenge. Think before you speak.
You said: "What question? Reposted where? "
Before we proceed, have you now managed to locate the question I posted twice which you were having trouble finding?
You said to KellyJay earlier in this thread:
I've given you several examples of why it probably isn't a real tree and you have given none as to why it is. Can you provide some scriptural corroboration to back up your claim that it is a real tree?
Can you provide some scriptural corroboration to back up your claim that it is not a real tree? You give only your "reasons" but then demand scriptural corroboration from KellyJay.
Are you fishing* for fools?
*caught anything yet?
18 Aug 14
2 edits
Originally posted by lemon limeReally. How was your comment a challenge? I posted a question to you which you ignored; I reposted it to you in italics (to help you see it) pointing out that it was being reposted, and in reply to that post you said:
It wasn't a question, it was a challenge.
What question? Reposted where?
How is that a challenge?
18 Aug 14
Originally posted by divegeesterReally. How was your comment a challenge?
Really. How was your comment a challenge? I posted a question to you which you ignored; I reposted it to you in italics (to help you see it) pointing out that it was being reposted, and in reply to that post you said:
[b]What question? Reposted where?
How is that a challenge?[/b]
What comment? I said your question wasn't really a question, it was a challenge. Now I know for a fact that you're just screwing around here, or are too distracted to realize what is being said.
Can you be bothered to spend 10 minutes going through your own thread to find where I answered your question about trees? I doubt it.
Originally posted by FMFYou and dive make a team too. A team of what I couldn't say, but you two appear to be a team.
lemon lime reminds me a bit of Suzianne and robbie carrobie. He should fit right in here. 😀
A team for two
and two for team
a team for me
a team for you....
By the way, has anyone ever talked to you about impulse control?*
*just asking
Originally posted by lemon limeThis sounds a bit like a robbie carrobie post. Sounds a bit like something from the Clans Forum. You'll fit right in.
You and dive make a team too. A team of what I couldn't say, but you two appear to be a team.
A team for two
and two for team
a team for me
a team for you....
By the way, has anyone ever talked to you about impulse control?*
*just asking
As I said earlier, I don't think anyone seriously questions divegeester's Christian faith and belief in its God figure. It seems to me that one of the questions that may be underpinning this discussion is ~ '...does insisting that allegories in scripture are "literally true" serve to obscure or misinterpret the role that God did play in creation and how it was actually brought about?'
You posted a link to some jpg or other.
Do you have a response to the content of my comment, which was addressed to you, and was on-topic?
Originally posted by divegeesteractually i think he has the measure of you and your hero scourgebag effhim. If hes not pandering his opinions as some kind of currency hes filling up his balloon with them and sailing around the forums being blown hither and zither. Jaggy nettle underpants are the order of the day for you and him, that way you can scourge yourselves.
LemonLime, the concept of debating on these boards is that you read the correspondents posts before replying, that way you tend too look less of a twit on the internet.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think you're trying a little to hard to be funny, robbie.
actually i think he has the measure of you and your hero scourgebag effhim. If hes not pandering his opinions as some kind of currency hes filling up his balloon with them and sailing around the forums being blown hither and zither. Jaggy nettle underpants are the order of the day for you and him, that way you can scourge yourselves.
Do you think insisting that allegories in scripture are "literally true" risks obscuring or even misinterpreting the role that the Christian God played in creation and how it was actually brought about?'
Originally posted by FMFWhy you should think your opinions have meaning for other people I cannot say, to me they are balloon fuel.
I think you're trying a little to hard to be funny, robbie.
Do you think insisting that allegories in scripture are "literally true" risks obscuring or even misinterpreting the role that the Christian God played in creation and how it was actually brought about?'
Look how your insistence in belief of your own propaganda attempts to project its values onto other people, allegories is your evaluation, not mine and your attempt to project those values as if they were my own is transparent, intellectually dishonest and rather slithery.
If you want to insist that these accounts are allegorical may i suggest you provide some evidence for your claims but i would be pleased if you stopped attempting to impose your values onto me as if they were my own.
I wish I could find something valuable in your posts.