The Garden of Eden

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the entire crux of your strawman argument is whether something needs to be explicitly stated in scripture Elmer, this has been proven not to be the case, i provided an example of that. seeing that you cannot refute it and keep slobbering and drooling about your obsession with the Gman it appears that you will not or cannot tell us whether something ...[text shortened]... knew that already. You keep focusing on personalities and we shall keep addressing the issues.

My debate is with Galveston. You have only decided to get involved since he has once again painted himself into a corner and finds the only way out is to be either dishonest or allow you to come here and flap about on his behalf in some sort of atoning self flagellation.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so you were telling us whether something needs to be explicitly stated in scripture for it to have any veracity to its claim, oh no you weren't because it doesn't need to be, does it, that you cannot bring yourself to say it is typical. we can now dismiss any of your claims on this basis as ludicrous until such times as you do address the issue.

No I wasn't. This is hilarious.

I'm waiting patiently for the return of Galveston to answer the questions put to him about his self certified opinion that the garden of Eden was destroyed in the Noah flood.

Keep trying .

Originally posted by divegeester
May debate is with Galveston. You have only decided to get involved since he has once again painted himself into a corner and finds the only way out is to be either dishonest or allow you to come here and flap about on his behalf in some sort of atoning self flagellation.

oh dear, please slobber and drool to someone else, its embarrassing reading your drivel. when you can bring yourself to address a real issue, let me know, ill be around.

Originally posted by divegeester
No I wasn't. This is hilarious.

I'm waiting patiently for the return of Galveston to answer the questions put to him about his self certified opinion that the garden of Eden was destroyed in the Noah flood.

Keep trying .

yawn, less focus on personalities, more focus on issues please, this is like reading graphitti on a toilet wall.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
oh dear, please slobber and drool to someone else, its embarrassing reading your drivel. when you can bring yourself to address a real issue, let me know, ill be around.

I'll be here waiting for Galveston.

Originally posted by divegeester
I'll be here waiting for Galveston.

Stalking him again, wow, you should be reported for that.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Stalking him again, wow, you should be reported for that.

Oh please do....please.

Originally posted by divegeester
Oh please do....please.

wow what a creep man, really, a stalker.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie to divegeester
wow what a creep man, really, a stalker.

Two posts ago you yourself said "yawn, less focus on personalities, more focus on issues please, this is like reading graphitti on a toilet wall."

Originally posted by FMF
Two posts ago you yourself said "yawn, less focus on personalities, more focus on issues please, this is like reading graphitti on a toilet wall."

He said he is going to lie in wait for someone, is that not stalking, if not then what is it? Is that not what stalkers do? either way its creepy.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its an inference from scripture and a plausibility. so you were telling us how, given the example that I cited of cigarettes why their not being explicitly mentioned in scripture has any bearing on the veracity of the claim that their use is forbidden in scripture the Christian being counselled to refrain from anything which defiles the spirit or flesh.

You have described opinions like the one you have about the fate of the so called "Tree of Life" as "mere self-certified opinions". What impact does "plausibility" have on the "self-certified" aspect of your belief?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
He said he is going to lie in wait for someone, is that not stalking, if not then what is it? Is that not what stalkers do? either way its creepy.

This is a discussion and debate forum and divegeester has been involved in a lengthy discussion with galveston75 and is going to wait and see what galveston75 says next, regardless of any other poster's attempts to 'poison the well'.

Originally posted by FMF
You have described opinions like the one you have about the fate of the so called "Tree of Life" as "mere self-certified opinions". What impact does "plausibility" have on the "self-certified" aspect of your belief?

this is more free bird seed Wile E Cayote.

First of all its makes an assumption that the claim 'self certified opinions' are the same as something not being explicitly stated in scripture. Now I am an unassuming man Wile E Coyote and when i read statements like yours I am left just wondering why you would assume so much.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
this is more free bird seed Wile E Cayote.

First of all its makes an assumption that the claim 'self certified opinions' are the same as something not being explicitly stated in scripture. Now I am an unassuming man Wile E Coyote and when i read statements like yours I am left just wondering why you would assume so much.

Is your personal opinion about this matter ~ which is not explicitly dealt with by scripture ~ a "mere self-certified opinion" of yours or not?

Originally posted by FMF
This is a discussion and debate forum and divegeester has been involved in a lengthy discussion with galveston75 and is going to wait and see what galveston75 says next, regardless of any other poster's attempts to 'poison the well'.

Oh dear, he has not managed to address a single question that was put to him because in doing so his entire argument will fall to shreds smoking on the forum floor, he's a stalker, plain and simple, he has inadvertently blurted out that he will lie in wait for someone, you call it what you like bit it amounts to stalking someone.