Spirituality
08 Aug 14
Originally posted by FMFI have not expressed any personal opinions Wile E Cayote, perhaps you had better try tacks on the road or a box with a boxing glove inside. Your proclivity for assuming too much is rather sometime.
Is your personal opinion about this matter ~ which is not explicitly dealt with by scripture ~ a "mere self-certified opinion" of yours or not?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere did he say he "would lie in wait" for someone? I can't find it. You are making stuff up. Copy paste it here.
Oh dear, he has not managed to address a single question that was put to him because in doing so his entire argument will fall to shreds smoking on the forum floor, he's a stalker, plain and simple, he has inadvertently blurted out that he will lie in wait for someone, you call it what you like bit it amounts to stalking someone.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you have no personal opinion to share about what happened to the "Tree Of Life"? Page 68 of this thread ~ which has been in part about the "Tree Of Life" ~ and you have no opinion on this matter?
I have not expressed any personal opinions Wile E Cayote, perhaps you had better try tacks on the road or a box with a boxing glove inside.
Originally posted by FMFI have what be be objectively established regardless of personal opinion.
So you have no personal opinion to share about what happened to the "Tree Of Life"? Page 68 of this thread ~ which has been in part about the "Tree Of Life" ~ and you have no opinion on this matter?
Originally posted by FMFHe said that he will be here waiting for the Gman, he said so himself. If i said to someone I will be here waiting to get you, one could reasonably expect that person to be there lying in wait. So not its not made up, its inferred.
You said he said he would "lie in wait". You made it up.
Originally posted by FMFI have what may be deduced scripturally, what is strange about that, I cannot say. Actually i see that you have also failed to address the matter of whether something needs to be explicitly stated in scripture or not for to have a potency of its own. Why not?
So you have no opinion on the Tree Of Life issue? This seems strange.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe all have to wait until somebody returns to rejoin a debate that we have been having with them. You are trying too hard to be funny.
He said that he will be here waiting for the Gman, he said so himself. If i said to someone I will be here waiting to get you, one could reasonably expect that person to be there lying in wait. So not its not made up, its inferred.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat your deduction is correct or justified is your personal opinion.
I have what may be deduced scripturally, what is strange about that, I cannot say. Actually i see that you have also failed to address the matter of whether something needs to be explicitly stated in scripture or not for to have a potency of its own. Why not?
Originally posted by FMFI am asking you effhim for the last time, does something need to be explicitly stated in scripture or not for it to have a validity of its own? I stated that it does not and provided an example. That is not merely an opinion, its a substantiated assertion based on reason and evidence.
That your deduction is correct or justified is your personal opinion.
Originally posted by FMFHe said that he will be here waiting for the Gman, that he did not explicitly state that he was a stalker is not relevant, it may be inferred from what he did say, that he will be here waiting for the Gman. He said it himself.
You're making it up. Copy paste where he said he is a stalker.