Spirituality
08 Aug 14
Originally posted by galveston75As you know I am a vocal critic of your religious cult; these extended threads serve the purpose of providing you and robbie carrobie with a platform to reveal your intellectual dishonesty, mean spiritedness, weird fringe doctrines and flunkie mind-set. They are also quite entertaining at times.
Psssst! There is no debate with me and you as I have no issue at all with my comments. It is only you with yourself.
So please continue on as this is intertaining to listen to your rambling mess.
Originally posted by divegeesterYup haters gonna hate
As you know I am a vocal critic of your religious cult; these extended threads serve the purpose of providing you and robbie carrobie with a platform to reveal your intellectual dishonesty, mean spiritedness, weird fringe doctrines and flunkie mind-set. They are also quite entertaining at times.
Originally posted by divegeesteryou were no challenge, you are never any challenge, logic and reason put you to the sword every time, all that keeps you afloat is hot air generated from a singular belief in your own propaganda. I don't believe a word you say and I don't know why you expect anyone else to believe a word you say. All one simply has to do is reason and you are blown away in another direction, slobbering and drooling your way across cyber space. What have we learned from you in 1000 pages, that you like to criticise others while being unable to substantiate your own perspective, we knew that already, that you like to lie in wait for people to confront them with more slobbery drool, well we knew that already as well. Its an absolutely futile exercise even trying to get you to reason, you are either unwilling in incapable of it especially when your balloon is lying in tatters on the forum floor after your assertions have been refuted. You pander yourself here as an extractor of straws from other peoples eyes when in reality you are devoid of substance and anything resembling reason yourself. What a room full of mirrors man!
Do you think that being challenged on your religious beliefs amounts to "hatred"?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think you and especially Galveston had your wheels off and pants on your head.
you were no challenge, you are never any challenge, logic and reason put you to the sword every time, all that keeps you afloat is hot air. One simply has to do is reason and you are blown away in another direction, slobbering and drooling your way across cyber space.
Originally posted by divegeesterI don't believe a word you say and i don't know why you expect anyone else to, here are the things you cannot bring yourself to answer,
I think you and especially Galveston had your wheels off and pants on your head.
does something need to be explicitly stated in scripture for it to be valid, I demonstrated that it did not refuting your argument against Galveston that his perspective was not explicitly stated in scripture which you whined about for about 600 pages
why if the garden in Eden was literal and we know that it was, were the trees in it, which were to serve as food for Adam and eve, not literal.
and logic beats you every time.
Originally posted by FMFmore slobber and drool from the man who could not bring himself to state whether smoking was a defilement of the flesh, a man who makes truth claims he cannot substantiate, please waste someone else's time with your nothingness. Are these hollow assertions a reflection of a spirituality that is devoid, i would give vent to the possibility, how else are we to account for them?
robbie is trying so very hard to be funny.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI unequivocally said "No", I don't believe it is "defilement of the flesh". If you don't smoke because you reckon a God figure told you not to, then don't. All your incessant catchphrases and buzz words like "slobber" and "drool" and "stalker" and "drugged balloonists" repeated over and over and over and over again are you trying too hard to be funny.
more slobber and drool from the man who could not bring himself to state whether smoking was a defilement of the flesh...
Originally posted by FMFhttp://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smoking-and-cancer/stats-evidence/
I unequivocally said "No", I don't believe it is "defilement of the flesh". If you don't smoke because you reckon a God figure told you not to, then don't. All your incessant catchphrases and buzz words like "slobber" and "drool" and "stalker" and "drugged balloonists" repeated over and over and over and over again are you trying too hard to be funny.
please tell us in view of the evidence presented above why smoking as you have stated here does not defile the flesh. I am trying nothing of the sort, its not an attempt at humour, its an illustration to describe you and people like you who stay afloat with naught but hot air.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePerhaps you should take those moments and use them to reflect upon yourself and your behaviour when you have some time when "doing cardio". There is no reason to believe that taking time to contemplate necessarily has to be "pretty mindless".
but you got to admit that doing cardio is pretty mindless, if they put daytime tv on them as well, which they do, its like well brain dead. so they put little games on them.
Originally posted by FMFThanks I'll do that, meditation is certainly beneficial, i might even use the time to try to understand why you are unwilling or incapable of rational thought.
Perhaps you should take those moments and use them to reflect upon yourself and your behaviour when you have some time when "doing cardio". There is no reason to believe that taking time to contemplate necessarily has to be "pretty mindless".
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you think it "defiles the flesh" that's fine. Does this prohibition that you reckon a God figure has handed to you also applies to working in a coal mine either or wading through a silt laden river or cooking with firewood in a confined space or walking around Jakarta without wearing a mask?
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smoking-and-cancer/stats-evidence/
please tell us in view of the evidence presented above why smoking as you have stated here dopers not defile the flesh.
So you reckon the Bible does not permit you to smoke. Good for you. You also think the Bible does not permit you to get involved in blood transfusions. Good for you. You also think the Bible does not permit you to give your wife oral sex. Good for you. Your opinion about what you can and cannot do is sovereign in these matters.