21 Jul 19
@divegeester saidHaha, he is referencing the time that I accused him of removing a post in which he was saying insulting things which was done to make a point about baseless accusations.
No, if you had simply edited it and included a prohibited word the post would have been automatically removed.
Perhaps you think we all came down with the last shower or rain philokalia. As FMF says, you have a history of lying about removed posts.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidNo, if you had simply edited it and included a prohibited word the post would have been automatically removed. Perhaps you think we all came down with the last shower of rain philokalia.
Yes, I swear to God (even though such is unnecessary) that I did not have anything to do with removing that post.
If I did, you'd have seen POST REMOVED BY USER.
As FMF says, you have a history of lying about removed posts.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidAs I said, you have a history of lying about these things and it is obvious to me that you are lying in this thread.
Haha, he is referencing the time that I accused him of removing a post in which he was saying insulting things which was done to make a point about baseless accusations.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidI’ve explained on the previous page why you would have removed it. Your behaviour now is underlining that I was correct.
I don't know what to say. You would've all seen the content of the post. It wasn't spicy or interesting.
This is a ridiculous interaction. But that's everything to be expected on the internet.
Game on.
21 Jul 19
1 edit
@philokalia saidYour blinky-eyed pretence of not understanding how the auto-mod system works is pathetic. If a poster edits their post to include a prohibited word then the post will be automatically removed.
Believe whatever you want.
Thinking I included a banned word (when it usually just doesn't get posted when it is used) and then reported myself to have it removed for some... Unknown goal is absurd.
This is what you did to allow yourself the lame retort to FMF when he called you out about you hypocrisy. And without leaving the “removed by poster” imprint.
I’m afraid you need to get up earlier in the morning Jacob.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidI’ve explained on the previous page why you removed the post. Why are you pretending that I haven’t?
... Unknown goal is absurd.
21 Jul 19
@divegeester saidHaha, bro, I didn't know about that feature. But now I do. Interesting.
Your blinky-eyed pretence of not understanding how the auto-mod system works is pathetic. If a poster edits their post to include a prohibited word then the post will be automatically removed.
This is what you did to allow yourself the lame retort to FMF when he called you out about you hypocrisy. And without leaving the “removed by poster” imprint.
I’m afraid you need to get up earlier in the morning Jacob.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidI’m not your “bro” and I don’t believe you, I think you are lying.
Haha, bro, I didn't know about that feature. But now I do. Interesting.
21 Jul 19
@divegeester saidThe hypocrisy of criticizing you for saying pen fifteen?
Philokalia seems to have requested to have his post criticising my use of St Penis of Antioch (which was mocking his flowery use of quoting various supposed saints) removed for some reason.
Possibly because he realised his hypocrisy.
Yeah man, I use some scurrolous language sometimes. But I admit it. And I didn't remove that post.
21 Jul 19
Moderators do not remove ‘auto-alerted’ posts unless there is a serious reason to do so, and if they do then they remove the original post (mine) which then removes all subsequent in-reply content also.
There is only one way your post could have been removed philokalia and that is by you editing it and removing it yourself.
21 Jul 19
@philokalia saidI’ll throw you a ladder down once you’ve finished digging yourself that hole...
The hypocrisy of criticizing you for saying pen fifteen?
Yeah man, I use some scurrolous language sometimes. But I admit it. And I didn't remove that post.