29 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuSorry, but i've run out of patience with you.
to ProperKnob
Where both talking about how life formed, because if there is talk about mutations, then that would be part of (life forming).
Anyhow my stand is that there may be some sighns of some life forms mutating over a long period, for instance, if the food supply of a particular species is plentifull, then we may find evidencve that the speci ...[text shortened]... olution, there is only one that is logical and reasonable, and that would be creation.
vishva
It's clear you have no grasp on the concepts you are talking about, and added to that you don't actually listen to anything anybody tells you, yet you think you are absolutely right. This seems to be a common theme running through all the threads you participate in.
In short, you are a lost cause old man. I might as well spend my time talking to a wall.
All the best.
30 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobto ProperKnob
Sorry, but i've run out of patience with you.
It's clear you have no grasp on the concepts you are talking about, and added to that you don't actually listen to anything anybody tells you, yet you think you are absolutely right. This seems to be a common theme running through all the threads you participate in.
In short, you are a lost cause old man. I might as well spend my time talking to a wall.
All the best.
When someone wants to pick up a cat to pat and stroke, sometimes the cat will run away because its scared, so then you persue the cat and corner it in a room, and you only want to be kind to the thing, but it doesnt know this, and it starts hissing and bucking and if it only knew that you werent a threat, but a friend., things would be different.
I have been the one, doing all the exsplaining all along, and i have not refused any question, and i have not had one question from you, asking about spiritual matters, but only questions relating to evolution, which is a construct of man, and i have not spent my life studying that therory, because at an early age i was convinced of a creator.( so it stand to reason that i cannot answer your evolution questions) and it also stand to reason that i would not want to study evolution, because of it being erronious.
As for evidence, there is none, and what little there is, is not evidence at all but the deceitfull pairing up of dusty bones to convince the guillable.
One cannot discuss in any leangth evolution, until they can exsplain as well, where the puddle, single cell squiggly, lighting bolt, planet and universe came from, and without the answer to that, then the rest is story telling.
If you are a teacher of evolution, then at any time you may reconsider you veiws, and look at the way of a supreme spiritual being, that has wonderfully and lovingly created what we have.
If you ask me, i will recommend a terrific book to read, and it is a spiritual book not a religious book.
keep well friend
vishva
30 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuEqually the food your ancestors ate was *you* in the making...who'd have thought a chicken drumstick would have you in it! 😕
to ProperKnob
Where both talking about how life formed, because if there is talk about mutations, then that would be part of (life forming).
Anyhow my stand is that there may be some sighns of some life forms mutating over a long period, for instance, if the food supply of a particular species is plentifull, then we may find evidencve that the speci ...[text shortened]... olution, there is only one that is logical and reasonable, and that would be creation.
vishva
30 Jun 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuAnd the error you are making is that you are dismissing a theory you don't understand on the grounds that it makes a claim that contradicts your beliefs. But since you don't understand the theory, you can hardly be sure that it does in fact contradict your beliefs.
..... and i have not spent my life studying that therory, because at an early age i was convinced of a creator.( so it stand to reason that i cannot answer your evolution questions) and it also stand to reason that i would not want to study evolution, because of it being erronious.
As for evidence, there is none, and what little there is, is not evidence at all but the deceitfull pairing up of dusty bones to convince the guillable.
You cannot possibly know this as you already admit that you have not studied evolution. So why do you make up the lies.
If you were secure in your beliefs it would not be necessary to lie about evolution.
One cannot discuss in any leangth evolution, until they can exsplain as well, where the puddle, single cell squiggly, lighting bolt, planet and universe came from, and without the answer to that, then the rest is story telling.
You cannot make such claims about something you don't understand, and refuse to understand or study.
If you ask me, i will recommend a terrific book to read, and it is a spiritual book not a religious book.
Why would anyone take recommendations from someone who lies at the drop of a hat, readily insults just about anyone, (calling Christians pedophiles) and generally dismisses everything but his own words as 'goobly gook'?
30 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadto twhitehead
And the error you are making is that you are dismissing a theory you don't understand on the grounds that it makes a claim that contradicts your beliefs. But since you don't understand the theory, you can hardly be sure that it does in fact contradict your beliefs.
[b]As for evidence, there is none, and what little there is, is not evidence at all but ristians pedophiles) and generally dismisses everything but his own words as 'goobly gook'?
Who did i call a ( PED),
vishva
hey twhiteHead wake up, iam just warming up.
30 Jun 10
Originally posted by twhiteheadto Twhitehead
You have several times implied it about Christians in general.
Because you feel hurt and insulted by my revealing that the evolution therory is false, you are throwing any accusations at me to discredit me.
But your digging yourself deeper into a situation for yourself that makes you look desperate and foolish.
When i say in my statement, quote (that is child abuse), i mean mental and emotional abuse, and now you look silly, claiming i called someone a pedophile.
There is nothing about the evolution therory to study, because the evidence has been tampered with and manufactured to fit the therory.
And if a person does not appreciate the spiritual power within this world, then they are deviod of all credibility to speak on any subject reguarding creation and the origon of the species.
But the reason i speak out against these people, is because they teach it to the innocent children, and thats CHILD ABUSE, and its a serious crime because it only adds more trouble, to the troubled world, if children think their grandfathers are monkeys.
vishva
30 Jun 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuBecause you feel hurt and insulted by my revealing that the evolution therory is false, you are throwing any accusations at me to discredit me.
to Twhitehead
Because you feel hurt and insulted by my revealing that the evolution therory is false, you are throwing any accusations at me to discredit me.
But your digging yourself deeper into a situation for yourself that makes you look desperate and foolish.
When i say in my statement, quote (that is child abuse), i mean mental and emotio ...[text shortened]... more trouble, to the troubled world, if children think their grandfathers are monkeys.
vishva
But you haven't revealed anything other than you don't know what you're talking about time and time again. You've demonstrated that you know absolutely nothing about evolutionary theroy, and you admit so when you say you've never studied it. How you can claim something is flawed and made up when you've never studied it is beyond me.
He's not throwing around accusations, you have clearly stated in past posts your beliefs about paedophilia and Christians.
There is nothing about the evolution therory to study, because the evidence has been tampered with and manufactured to fit the therory.
Evidence please.
30 Jun 10
to ProperKnob
Look its this simple, if there is no acceptance of a spiritual power, them evolution is not possable, so if its not possable, then study would be a useless activity.
Your evolution process cant even get off the ground, without the spiritual motivater, thats why i can say without reserve, that it is false, ....and why study a false thing.
vishva
30 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuif there is no acceptance of a spiritual power, them evolution is not possable
to ProperKnob
Look its this simple, if there is no acceptance of a spiritual power, them evolution is not possable, so if its not possable, then study would be a useless activity.
Your evolution process cant even get off the ground, without the spiritual motivater, thats why i can say without reserve, that it is false, ....and why study a false thing.
vishva
Prove it. Show me some studies, back up your claim with some peer reviewed research.
Have you ever read a book on evolutionary biology?
30 Jun 10
Originally posted by Proper Knobto ProperKnob
[b]if there is no acceptance of a spiritual power, them evolution is not possable
Prove it. Show me some studies, back up your claim with some peer reviewed research.
Have you ever read a book on evolutionary biology?[/b]
Reading a book on evolution is pointless, because with out the motivater within the species, then growth is not possible.
Its the spiritual component that is the life force within, so if you dont have the life force, theres no life, and if there is no life, then there is no species.
The species itself, wether its a dog or a cow, is only material energy, made of water, earth etc, and it is only alive because of the life within it, the spiritual being.
vishva
vishva
30 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuI am neither hurt nor insulted, nor have you 'revealed' anything. You just keep making false statements about evolution, Christians, Muslims, atheists and just about anyone and everything. I am just curious as to what your real motivation is.
Because you feel hurt and insulted by my revealing that the evolution therory is false,
Some have suggested that you are just here to market a book. If so, you are doing a pathetic job of it. If not, then what is your purpose? Do you honestly think that lies and insults will get people to listen to you?
There is nothing about the evolution therory to study, because the evidence has been tampered with and manufactured to fit the therory.
How would you know whether the evidence has been tampered with? How do you know what the motivations behind the supposed tamperers are? You know next to nothing about evolution and the evidence for it, and refuse to know anything about it. You must therefore be deliberately lying.
If you don't like my accusation, then explain to me what evidence you have that 'the evidence has been tampered with'. Explain to me how it is not a lie.
And if a person does not appreciate the spiritual power within this world, then they are deviod of all credibility to speak on any subject reguarding creation and the origon of the species.
I am afraid that credibility comes from things like honesty, integrity, the ability to back up your claims etc and not from what you declare to be the criteria. You, so far, are rather lacking in credibility.
30 Jun 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuReading a book on evolution is pointless, because with out the motivater within the species, then growth is not possible.
to ProperKnob
Reading a book on evolution is pointless, because with out the motivater within the species, then growth is not possible.
Its the spiritual component that is the life force within, so if you dont have the life force, theres no life, and if there is no life, then there is no species.
The species itself, wether its a dog or a cow, is ...[text shortened]... tc, and it is only alive because of the life within it, the spiritual being.
vishva
vishva
Utter nonsense. What is 'the motivator within the species'? I have no idea what you are talking about.
I take it then you have read no literature on evolution?!
The species itself, wether its a dog or a cow, is only material energy, made of water, earth etc
No. They are made of atoms, which make molecules, which make amino acids, which make proteins, which make genes.