Go back
‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

Spirituality

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
Clock
06 Feb 18
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
Let's just focus on the theological discussion at hand and not let the conversation degenerate too much.
Evidently it wasn't spelled out enough for you. More's the pity. Like I said, " it'll have to do".

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
I am not celebrating the fact that some people choose darkness. But certainly, it is not a dirty thing to say that it is just for the wicked to be punished.
Conversations over the years with many of the Christians who have resided or still reside on this forum have indicated that they believe Muslims, for example ~ as non-Christians ~ face being burned in "Hell" for eternity. Do you believe my Muslim neighbours have "chosen darkness" and that they are "wicked" ~ on account of the fact that they don't believe in Jesus like you?

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120159
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
Sure, I'll do that sometime. But not now.

I want it to be fresh at that point. It's quite stale and I think that thread is rightfully dying. You got to let these things breath.
Sure, whatever excuse suits you.

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120159
Clock
06 Feb 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
Sure, I'll do that sometime. But not now.

I want it to be fresh at that point. It's quite stale and I think that thread is rightfully dying. You got to let these things breath.
So you are going to go back and address your racist comments, but not now, but when the thread dies, and you are going to let it breath?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
06 Feb 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @thinkofone
No amount of your weasling is going to change what they say. Deal with it.

1 John 3
7Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. The one who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. 8The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to ...[text shortened]... ly defines the dividing line as to who are "children of God" and who are "children of the devil"
That doesn't contradict what I am saying and what other parts of the Bible say that you would rather ignore:

Ephesians 2:8-10: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

No amount of your weaseling is going to change this. Deal with it.

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120159
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
... I can see how, in the great context here, it does not take too much for this to tie into the other Biblical passages that involve the notion of folks who love darkness and reject the light.

Look, I am not celebrating the fact that some people choose darkness. But certainly, it is not a dirty thing to say that it is just for the wicked ...[text shortened]... t reject the notion of evil. After all, they have no concept of immutable virtues and truths.
What I asked I asked for was how you reconcile eternal torture in hell by your (and others) version of Jesus with scriptures such as John 3:16.

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120159
Clock
06 Feb 18
2 edits

Originally posted by @jacob-verville
Let's stick to the debate at hand.
The debate in hand is the OP, the notion and teaching that Jesus who loves people so much that he died for them while they were still sinners, will be then torturing them in hell for eternity if they reject him. It is a completely nonsensical notion.

This is the debate in hand Jacob Verville.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @divegeester
The debate in hand is the OP, the notion and teaching that Jesus who loves people so much that he died for them while they were still sinners, will be then torturing them in hell for eternity if they reject him. It is a completely nonsensical notion.

This is the debate in hand Jacob Verville.
Do you believe everyone will be saved regardless of what they do or believe?

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
Clock
06 Feb 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @dj2becker
That doesn't contradict what I am saying and what other parts of the Bible say that you would rather ignore:

Ephesians 2:8-10: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ord ...[text shortened]... at we should walk in them.

No amount of your weaseling is going to change this. Deal with it.
Actually it does contradict what you've been saying.

Ezekiel 18
24“But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity and does according to all the abominations that a wicked man does, will he live? All his righteous deeds which he has done will not be remembered for his treachery which he has committed and his sin which he has committed; for them he will die.

1 John 3
7Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. The one who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. 8The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work. 9No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God. 10This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not God’s child,

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @thinkofone
Actually it does contradict what you've been saying.

Ezekiel 18
24“But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity and does according to all the abominations that a wicked man does, will he live? All his righteous deeds which he has done will not be remembered for his treachery which he has committed and his sin w ...[text shortened]... e children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not God’s child,
It is only a contradiction if you add words to Ezekiel 18 that aren't. I.e that righteousness is obtained without faith.

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120159
Clock
06 Feb 18

Is it just me or does Jacob Verville have a habit of disappearing when under scrutiny?

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @dj2becker
It is only a contradiction if you add words to Ezekiel 18 that aren't. I.e that righteousness is obtained without faith.
You have a think on it.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @fmf
Romans1009 cited looking after his mother as an example of 'good works' and his righteousness but it wouldn't be righteous to look after his mother if he weren't a Christian; it would be like "dirty rags".
This is not at all what I said.

I said being the sole caretaker for my elderly mother and contributing money to Christian-based charities were examples of my “good works.” I never ssid they made me righteous, because good works don’t make someone righteous.

The “filthy rags” reference was to the idea that a human being’s “good works” could make him righteous (in right standing with God.)

If you’re going to claim I said something, I’d appreciate a little more diligence in confirming that what you are claiming I said is actually what I said.

Philokalia

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
Clock
06 Feb 18

Originally posted by @divegeester
What I asked I asked for was how you reconcile eternal torture in hell by your (and others) version of Jesus with scriptures such as John 3:16.
There's two parts to the quotation, isn't there?

Clause One: For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son

Clause Two: that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

The second clause is there because the first part has to be contextualized. If the second clause didn't exist, it would imply that the totality of the world was justified by His Son... But the second clause makes it clear that it is for the salvation of those who believe.

Do you see my point?

As for talking about the eternity of hell... What can I say about it from that particular verse?

Not much, other than some people aren't saved, and the implication is that they do not go to heaven.

The Bible is more than John 3:16 for a reason, though, Dive.

Would you like to try to justify your position by using the whole Bible?

And since hell is relevant... perhaps you can cite scriptures about hell found in the Bible, in texts around John 3:16 to justify your position....

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
Clock
06 Feb 18
1 edit

John 8
4Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin.
31 ...If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; 32and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
35 The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever.

, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.