@no1marauder saidThen why haven’t you switched to Apple, #1? I don’t Starbuck’s either, too expensive and all I want is a regular cup of black coffee. Not all those woke gay LGBTQ mixtures. Just another ruinous factor of the libs, can hardly find a cuppa coffee anymore.. what is the next change of our society going to be, you are certainly on the inner circle?
You can find such information in seconds with a Smartphone if you know how to properly word searches. I have a nice S22 (I'm an Android guy), so people playing dumb wouldn't work even at Starbucks (which I don't go to).
It's the 21st Century, Joe.
17 Apr 23
@no1marauder saidYou are telling us that bragg does not mention the statute of limitations having an exception such as this. Can you not speak directly to why Bragg does not mention the statute of limitations having an exception such as this. ?Can you not comment directly to why does not say that.? he is the only one that knows about it, and all of our people are running around, like chickens, saying the statute has expired. Is he playing a game like you do?
Because this is a legal proceeding.
What will happen is that Trump's lawyers, assuming they are reasonably competent, will file pre-trial motions which will presumably include a Motion to Dismiss on, inter alia, grounds of the Statute of Limitations. And then Bragg will oppose said motion and both sides will present legal arguments for and against the motion. And then the Judge will decide.
That's how the legal system works, even for Donald Trump.
17 Apr 23
@averagejoe1 saidBecause its a defense.
You are telling us that bragg does not mention the statute of limitations having an exception such as this. Can you not speak directly to why Bragg does not mention the statute of limitations having an exception such as this. ?Can you not comment directly to why does not say that.? he is the only one that knows about it, and all of our people are running around, like chickens, saying the statute has expired. Is he playing a game like you do?
He's the prosecutor.
Get it?
17 Apr 23
@no1marauder saidNo, it is not a defense. It is, follow me here in plain English, a prosecutor who is alleging a crime, which is no longer chargeable due to the statute. But you say that it IS chargeable due to the out of jurisdiction exception.
Because its a defense.
He's the prosecutor.
Get it?
So for the 12th time, why does the prosecutor not refer to the exception, thus making him correct to bring the charge?
So you are going to sit here with a bunch of non-lawyers, and discuss trial preparation, and whatever else goes along with it? It is quite boring, and you have definitely evaded the hell out of this question. You waste peoples time.
@averagejoe1 saidYes, please, I gave you this question from Bunba, earlier, here it is again. Don’t get like that childlike Jimmm639 character and go off on a tangent about my simple question, calling it something that it is not. It is a simple question. You see, he would say something like “you don’t have a friend named Bubba.” I figure you are going to do that pretty quickly here.
If you came off the top of your head with this at Stqrbuck's, I would say I am surprised , I have never heard of that. You got me. Then our friend Bubba would say, "Well why is this still a daily issue? If the law still applies under that exception, why doesn't someone just flat out make it dogma and let Bragg move on? Why doesn't Bragg show everyone like me exactly what you just said, Marauder?'"
So could you answer Bubba's question ?
HA! It just dawned on me that you did indeed pull a Jimmm632 when you said, “I don’t go to Starbucks” . Is that germane? . That is really weak debating man.
@averagejoe1 saidBecause it's a defense and one which has to be asserted by the defendant before the prosecution has to respond to it.
No, it is not a defense. It is, follow me here in plain English, a prosecutor who is alleging a crime, which is no longer chargeable due to the statute. But you say that it IS chargeable due to the out of jurisdiction exception.
So for the 12th time, why does the prosecutor not refer to the exception, thus making him correct to bring the charge?
So you are going ...[text shortened]... quite boring, and you have definitely evaded the hell out of this question. You waste peoples time.
17 Apr 23
@no1marauder saidBut what is there to assert? If it is black and white, that the statute of limitation does not apply, it would not be an issue.
Because it's a defense and one which has to be asserted by the defendant before the prosecution has to respond to it.
You must just enjoy texting.
17 Apr 23
@averagejoe1 saidI'm sorry if you're too stupid to understand Criminal Procedure in New York.
But what is there to assert? If it is black and white, that the statute of limitation does not apply, it would not be an issue.
You must just enjoy texting.
I've wasted sufficient time trying to explain it in simple terms to such a stubborn moron.
Statute of Limitations is a defense.
It must be asserted by the Defendant or it is waived.
The prosecution is under no obligation to raise the issue of Statute of Limitations unless and until the Defendant raises it, usually in a pre-trial motion to dismiss.
That is New York law which applies even to Donald Trump.
17 Apr 23
@averagejoe1 saidiPhones require special earphones and chargers and you can't have both plugged in at the same time
Then why haven’t you switched to Apple, #1? I don’t Starbuck’s either, too expensive and all I want is a regular cup of black coffee. Not all those woke gay LGBTQ mixtures. Just another ruinous factor of the libs, can hardly find a cuppa coffee anymore.. what is the next change of our society going to be, you are certainly on the inner circle?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
17 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidiphones dont require any cords
iPhones require special earphones and chargers and you can't have both plugged in at the same time
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
17 Apr 23
@no1marauder saidyou are looking likea fool little man
I'm sorry if you're too stupid to understand Criminal Procedure in New York.
I've wasted sufficient time trying to explain it in simple terms to such a stubborn moron.
Statute of Limitations is a defense.
It must be asserted by the Defendant or it is waived.
The prosecution is under no obligation to raise the issue of Statute of Limitations unless and until th ...[text shortened]... sually in a pre-trial motion to dismiss.
That is New York law which applies even to Donald Trump.
17 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidI have a portable charger that you can use for both the recent Androids (Type C) as well as IPhones. Also have a wireless charger that works for both.
iPhones require special earphones and chargers and you can't have both plugged in at the same time
My S22 also requires special earphones which is annoying.
@no1marauder saidBah I’d rather use an old Samsung so I don’t have to throw away all my micro usb cords, I can use five dollar earphones and I don’t get a panic attack every time it gets broken lost or stolen (and no need for insurance either).
I have a portable charger that you can use for both the recent Androids (Type C) as well as IPhones. Also have a wireless charger that works for both.
My S22 also requires special earphones which is annoying.
New phones are just expensive status symbols; the cell phone equivalent of a Mercedes or BMW.
I’m constantly using them to watch YouTube so I know you don’t need a new phone for that.
17 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidMan, I would not let that be the deciding factor by any stretch. Charging the phone? They're a few on-board apps and features which lessen drain. Just low-power mode is great, but the list goes on. Full day charge with no problem.
iPhones require special earphones and chargers and you can't have both plugged in at the same time
17 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidBy earphones do y'all mean a wire from phone to ears? iPods are magic and require no wire. I have never had a need to plug a wire into the phone. I must be missing what you are talking about?
Bah I’d rather use an old Samsung so I don’t have to throw away all my micro usb cords, I can use five dollar earphones and I don’t get a panic attack every time it gets broken lost or stolen (and no need for insurance either).
New phones are just expensive status symbols; the cell phone equivalent of a Mercedes or BMW.
I’m constantly using them to watch YouTube so I know you don’t need a new phone for that.