Go back
Bonus question…

Bonus question…

Debates

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
17 Apr 23

@averagejoe1 said
Man, I would not let that be the deciding factor by any stretch. Charging the phone? They're a few on-board apps and features which lessen drain. Just low-power mode is great, but the list goes on. Full day charge with no problem.
Or how about how there is an extensive list of freeware independently created programs and games available on an Android but which Apple blocks

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
17 Apr 23
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
you are looking likea fool little man
Marauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
17 Apr 23
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
By earphones do y'all mean a wire from phone to ears? iPods are magic and require no wire. I have never had a need to plug a wire into the phone. I must be missing what you are talking about?
Relying on batteries has significant drawbacks. Do you buy battery powered firearms too?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
18 Apr 23
1 edit

@athousandyoung said
Relying on batteries has significant drawbacks. Do you buy battery powered firearms too?

[youtube BioWare gun]2cRm9BMxl90[/youtube]


Snoop:
Yeah, man. Man say if you wanna shoot nails, this here the Cadillac, man. Meant Lexus but he ain't know it.

Chris:
Hold a charge better?

Snoop:
Man, f*** a charge, this here's a gun powder activated, 27 caliber, full auto, no kickback, nail-throwing mayhem man.


(^they were upset because their nail gun kept running out of batteries right when they needed it)

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
18 Apr 23

@athousandyoung said
[youtube The Wire scene]JDpvkwBBu6U[/youtube]

Snoop:
Yeah, man. Man say if you wanna shoot nails, this here the Cadillac, man. Meant Lexus but he ain't know it.

Chris:
Hold a charge better?

Snoop:
Man, f*** a charge, this here's a gun powder activated, 27 caliber, full auto, no kickback, nail-throwing mayhem man.


(^they were upset because their nail gun kept running out of batteries right when they needed it)
Thanks, I was having a hard time understanding what he was saying, Do you have a video recording, maybe I could do better if I hear the words, or the pronunciations of the words, at least. You know, what he say.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Apr 23
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Marauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?
I'm giving you the law, I'm sorry if the paid propagandists you rely on aren't.

No actual motions have been filed yet, but generally defense lawyers put in any that have a plausible basis. So I expect Trump's lawyers to do the same. 99% of the time pre-trial motions to dismiss are denied, but you never know and there's no risk in filing them.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147487
Clock
18 Apr 23

@averagejoe1 said
Marauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?
the defense lawyers cant see because of the tears in their eyes from laughing

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Apr 23

@mott-the-hoople said
the defense lawyers cant see because of the tears in their eyes from laughing
I hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
18 Apr 23

@no1marauder said
I hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.
I do appreciate your eloquent stab at a bit of humor

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147487
Clock
18 Apr 23

@no1marauder said
I hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.
should we go ahead and get the rope ready?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
18 Apr 23

@mott-the-hoople said
should we go ahead and get the rope ready?
Marauder is couching his phrasing, such that if we are proven right, he will be able to say that he was not saying it is 'for sure' that the statute will not apply,,,,,only that it may be a defense.
But we see through that ploy!!!

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Apr 23
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Marauder is couching his phrasing, such that if we are proven right, he will be able to say that he was not saying it is 'for sure' that the statute will not apply,,,,,only that it may be a defense.
But we see through that ploy!!!
I'll say that any motion to dismiss based on the Statute of Limitations will be denied.

Do you want to claim it won't?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Apr 23

In the meantime, here's some homework for you to study on Pretrial Motions in Criminal cases in New York: https://nysba.org/NYSBA/Sections/Coursebooks/Young%20Lawyers/2019%20Trial%20Academy/Mitchell%20Motions%20CLE%20Final%20updated%202.pdf

Please note:

E. C.P.L. § 210.20 PRETRIAL DISMISSAL MOTIONS-FELONIES

A motion to dismiss an indictment or a count thereof can be made on the following
grounds: ..........................................

vi. The prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. See, CPL § 30.10

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147487
Clock
19 Apr 23
1 edit

@no1marauder said
In the meantime, here's some homework for you to study on Pretrial Motions in Criminal cases in New York: https://nysba.org/NYSBA/Sections/Coursebooks/Young%20Lawyers/2019%20Trial%20Academy/Mitchell%20Motions%20CLE%20Final%20updated%202.pdf

Please note:

E. C.P.L. § 210.20 PRETRIAL DISMISSAL MOTIONS-FELONIES

A motion to dismiss an indictment or a count thereof ca ...[text shortened]... ...................

vi. The prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. See, CPL § 30.10
wow…we are so impressed 😂

not laughing with you little man, laughing @ you 😂

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
19 Apr 23
1 edit

@no1marauder said
I'll say that any motion to dismiss based on the Statute of Limitations will be denied.

Do you want to claim it won't?
I claim it will not be denied....if there is such a motion.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.