@shavixmir saidThere is always voter fraud in very election everywhere, the only thing to debate is the extent and form of that fraud.
THERE WAS NO VOTER FRAUD!!
Jesus. Imbeciles.
@wajoma saidWe're talking about the election
There is always voter fraud in very election everywhere, the only thing to debate is the extent and form of that fraud.
here, in The United States...
No evidence of any voter fraud that
would've changed the outcome..........2020/election/USA
@jimm619 saidI can't be bothered with you anymore you've got joey b style dementia or some other brain malfunction.
We're talking about the election
here, in The United States...
No evidence of any voter fraud that
would've changed the outcome..........2020/election/USA
Shag doody said 'There was no voter fraud' My point is that there is always voter fraud it's just the, ahhh, fuggit I give up, you're dumb as a box of rocks.
15 Jan 22
@wajoma saidThey always follow up with the outcome thing.
There is always voter fraud in very election everywhere, the only thing to debate is the extent and form of that fraud.
It is the "I'm wrong, but I'm still not wrong" defense.
Of course, they don't know what extent of that fraud is......but it just cannot be enough to make DJT right. It is called faith. They belong at the spirituality forum, not here.
@no1marauder said"But the state said the software problem was not related to the Dominion voting equipment."
"A failure to properly update software was the reason for a computer glitch that caused massive errors in unofficial election results reported from Antrim county, the Michigan Department of State said late Friday."
""The erroneous reporting of unofficial results from Antrim county was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County clerk," the state agenc ...[text shortened]... ing an article next time. You've repeated these false claims literally dozens of times on this site.
Yes it was. Software is part of the equipment.
Since when was software not equipment?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equipment
When someone is trying to alter the definition of words when they give you an excuse it is probably because they are deceiving you. BTW, is failure to update software a "glitch"?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glitch
The news article that called it a "glitch" was wrong then. Is that now your position of ever changing positions?
15 Jan 22
@shavixmir saidchildish
God damn.
Fukking republikkunt retards.
Like a broken record player; over and over and over and over and over and over.
The republikkunts lost the election fair and square. Get over it!
15 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidAs the article says and the State confirmed, the software had nothing to do with the Dominion voting machines but was part of an election management program used by county clerks AFTER the machines had tabulated the voting data.
"But the state said the software problem was not related to the Dominion voting equipment."
Yes it was. Software is part of the equipment.
Since when was software not equipment?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equipment
When someone is trying to alter the definition of words when they give you an excuse it is probably because they are deceiving you. ...[text shortened]... icle that called it a "glitch" was wrong then. Is that now your position of ever changing positions?
You really need to try and read.
15 Jan 22
@wajoma saidI will repeat myself for our
I can't be bothered with you anymore you've got joey b style dementia or some other brain malfunction.
Shag doody said 'There was no voter fraud' My point is that there is always voter fraud it's just the, ahhh, fuggit I give up, you're dumb as a box of rocks.
learned NEW ZEALANDER,......
We don't really know what happened
in YOUR ELECTION but in OUR ELECTION
there was no discernible voter fraud..
For Your Clarification
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/election
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discernible
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fraud
15 Jan 22
@mott-the-hoople saidIt’s the only way to communicate with the likes of you. Rationality is not an option.
childish
@no1marauder saidRight, the same people that told you software was not equipment. It is.
As the article says and the State confirmed, the software had nothing to do with the Dominion voting machines but was part of an election management program used by county clerks AFTER the machines had tabulated the voting data.
You really need to try and read.
From the same people the told you it was a glitch when it was not.
How do you know that what you are being told is true?
How do you know what is in the source code? It is not open source.
If a state does not have control of the “source code” for the software applications in use how could the state possibly know that it was a failure to download new software? More importantly, how do you know the new software doesn't contain vote rigging source code?
16 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidNo. You're wrong about Dominion. There's a paper trail. They may win all these defamation lawsuits.
The Dominion voting machine flipped about 6000 votes from Trump to Biden. Votes were changed.
The only reason Michigan caught the discrepancy was because someone went to look at the printed-out poll tapes – the raw numbers that come out of the voter machines – and when they compared those numbers to the tabulated results provided by the state, they discovered the numb ...[text shortened]... www.theepochtimes.com/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.html
Also, regarding lawsuits, the contested states didn't send Trump electors. You'd think they would if he actually won those lawsuits.
17 Jan 22
@wildgrass saidNot in all states.
No. You're wrong about Dominion. There's a paper trail. They may win all these defamation lawsuits.
Also, regarding lawsuits, the contested states didn't send Trump electors. You'd think they would if he actually won those lawsuits.
Louisiana has no paper trail at all and Kentucky, Tennessee and Texas have some jurisdictions with a paper trail and others without. In Louisiana a recount will merely verify the fraudulent numbers.