31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidAnd you are doing the opposite.
Okay, thanks.
You don't know why he laughed then. You are just giving him the benefit of the doubt, right?
31 Dec 21
@athousandyoung saidMaybe he does that for people with poor critical thinking skills because they would not notice what is obvious to me. Or maybe for people in denial that can't put two and two together.Have you ever heard of political commentary? Meet the press has political commentary. Is that is a sure sign that you are relying on propaganda if you watch NBC's Meet the Press?
Maybe. I don't watch NBC's Meet the Press. I certainly wouldn't post 7 minutes of NBC commentary about a 1 minute clip if the 1 minute clip was the topic of debate.
31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidNo he does that to sway the interpretation of the audience because this is propaganda. An important part of critical thinking is determining the bias of the source which you don't seem to be able to do:
Maybe he does that for people with poor critical thinking skills because they would not notice what is obvious to me. Or maybe for people in denial that can't put two and two together.
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-identify-cognitive-bias#how-does-cognitive-bias-impact-the-way-we-think
Biases make it difficult for people to exchange accurate information or derive truths. A cognitive bias distorts our critical thinking, leading to possibly perpetuating misconceptions or misinformation that can be damaging to others.
Biases lead us to avoid information that may be unwelcome or uncomfortable, rather than investigating the information that could lead us to a more accurate outcome. Biases can also cause us to see patterns or connections between ideas that aren’t necessarily there.
31 Dec 21
Specifically this sort of thing is called "spin":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(propaganda)
In public relations and politics, spin is a form of propaganda, achieved through knowingly providing a biased interpretation of an event or campaigning to influence public opinion about some organization or public figure. While traditional public relations and advertising may manage their presentation of facts, "spin" often implies the use of disingenuous, deceptive, and manipulative tactics.
31 Dec 21
@athousandyoung saidWhy didn't he say it was silly to suggest it?
And you are doing the opposite.
I wouldn't expect him to say he thought it was a wonderful idea after laughing like Dr. Evil. I would expect him to say it was silly if that is why he laughed though. I don't think Gates has heard of any gene vaccine mandate he doesn't like. He profits from them.
What if some Americans went to Mexico and took the Sinopharm vaccine instead. Do you think Bill would accept that as meeting the vaccine mandate criteria? It is WHO EUA approved. He doesn't own stock in Sinopharm, does he?
So how about it? Sinopharm mandate approved?
What about the new vaccine from Cuba?
Both of those are real vaccines, not gene vaccines.
31 Dec 21
@athousandyoung saidYou don't think the corporate news media does that?
Specifically this sort of thing is called "spin":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(propaganda)
In public relations and politics, spin is a form of propaganda, achieved through knowingly providing a biased interpretation of an event or campaigning to influence public opinion about some organization or public figure. While traditional public relations and ...[text shortened]... of facts, "spin" often implies the use of disingenuous, deceptive, and manipulative tactics.
31 Dec 21
This might help you:
https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/critical-thinking.html
Try this simple exercise to help you to start thinking critically.
Think of something that someone has recently told you. Then ask yourself the following questions:
Who said it?
Someone you know? Someone in a position of authority or power? Does it matter who told you this?
...
Where did they say it?
Was it in public or in private? Did other people have a chance to respond an provide an alternative account?
...
Why did they say it?
Did they explain the reasoning behind their opinion? Were they trying to make someone look good or bad?
31 Dec 21
@Metal-Brain
Funny how you make up BULLSHYTE based on NOTHING.
You try to convince us science is able to make such BS vaccines tracking people and all that ROT.
Science isn't even CLOSE to that level of intrusion of human bodies.
It would be amusing if you were not just trying in your own incompetent way to spread chaos in the land so you can win your socialist war against the US.
But it turns out all you are at core is an AMATEUR troll. You are not even GOOD at it.
31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidThey absolutely do which is why I try to avoid using corporate news media interpretations of what happened as references. It's best to go directly to the source.
You don't think the corporate news media does that?
31 Dec 21
@athousandyoung saidSo does the corporate news media.
No he does that to sway the interpretation of the audience because this is propaganda. An important part of critical thinking is determining the bias of the source which you don't seem to be able to do:
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-identify-cognitive-bias#how-does-cognitive-bias-impact-the-way-we-think
Biases make it difficult for people to ...[text shortened]... an also cause us to see patterns or connections between ideas that aren’t necessarily there.
Is anyone allowed to debate Fauci on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Bill Gates on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Al Gore on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Francis Collins on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Rochelle Walinsky on the corporate news?
Nope, they are allowed to comment without any opposing views to ask them questions to challenge the narrative. That is called propaganda by omission. An important part of critical thinking is determining what is being omitted from from the narrative with uninterrupted commentary.
Debates are being omitted. You are only hearing one side of the story on the corporate news media. You have it backwards, you are being swayed by propaganda from the corporate news media. I am just attempting to deprogram you from the lies you accepted.
31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidNo, but I have better video of Bill Gates laughing at the conspiracy theory that SS will be denied unless people get vaxxed.
Do you have a better video of Bill Gates laughing at the thought of denying people SS unless they get the jab he profits so much from?
31 Dec 21
1 edit
@metal-brain saidDo you see my referencing any of the above in my posts?
So does the corporate news media.
Is anyone allowed to debate Fauci on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Bill Gates on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Al Gore on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Francis Collins on the corporate news?
Is anyone allowed to debate Rochelle Walinsky on the corporate news?
Nope, they are ...[text shortened]... nda from the corporate news media. I am just attempting to deprogram you from the lies you accepted.
The only "side of the story" I'm being exposed to is you making this post on the Debates forum, as well as the commentary in the video you quoted.
31 Dec 21
@athousandyoung saidWhat source do you go to then? Quite often the corporate news media is the source. Jimmy Dore's source is CNN, right? That is where Anderson Cooper works. That is your source too, but Jimmy Dore didn't omit any important context to mislead.
They absolutely do which is why I try to avoid using corporate news media interpretations of what happened as references. It's best to go directly to the source.
You didn't deny watching the corporate news media. Are you suggesting you are not swayed by their narrative at all? You know you are listening to commentary on those news programs too, right? It isn't just the Sunday morning political talk shows. There is commentary on every news program. Can you name a single exception?
31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidI went directly to the interview you were talking about. I provided the transcript, full video and a timestamp to help people find the exact clip in question.
What source do you go to then? Quite often the corporate news media is the source. Jimmy Dore's source is CNN, right? That is where Anderson Cooper works. That is your source too, but Jimmy Dore didn't omit any important context to mislead.
You didn't deny watching the corporate news media. Are you suggesting you are not swayed by their narrative at all? You know you a ...[text shortened]... ng political talk shows. There is commentary on every news program. Can you name a single exception?
I DID NOT go to some third party's interpretation of the clip.
31 Dec 21
@metal-brain saidI DON'T WATCH THAT CRAP AND I DON'T USE IT AS REFERENCES ON THIS FORUM
What source do you go to then? Quite often the corporate news media is the source. Jimmy Dore's source is CNN, right? That is where Anderson Cooper works. That is your source too, but Jimmy Dore didn't omit any important context to mislead.
You didn't deny watching the corporate news media. Are you suggesting you are not swayed by their narrative at all? You know you a ...[text shortened]... ng political talk shows. There is commentary on every news program. Can you name a single exception?