25 Sep 21
@suzianne saidUhhhhhhh....Suzianne..for god sakes, is this a point???? I have no idea what you just wrote . Did you just drop over to Sohouse's chicken coop for a nightcap??
You can afford it. I would bet a dollar to a donut that you gladly pay for your own "recreation" (Was her name "Stormy"? ). Would you pay one extra dollar in taxes to prevent this "holocaust" of abortion? No? Then you are, as always, a hypocrite.
Do you mean to say that you are NOT all that interested in "a more perfect Union"?
Perish the thought.
25 Sep 21
@Suzianne
Can you explain 'you can afford it'. Let's say that I can....Do you not get the point???? That money that you inmply that I can afford? Let's say it is $8,500.00. That is what they need over at the Child Enhancement Center, to get all their programs up and running >. Should I give it to the people you propose, for sexual recreation .....or, to the Child Enhancement Center ???????
Suzianne??? Can you respond to ONE post about your thoughtless post???? Just once??? And you are a psychology major?
25 Sep 21
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidPlease. Even you cannot be this stupid.
@Suzianne
Can you explain 'you can afford it'. Let's say that I can....Do you not get the point???? That money that you inmply that I can afford? Let's say it is $8,500.00. That is what they need over at the Child Enhancement Center, to get all their programs up and running >. Should I give it to the people you propose, for sexual recreation .....or, to the Child En ...[text shortened]... respond to ONE post about your thoughtless post???? Just once??? And you are a psychology major?
I know, I know, you're just following your Führer's playbook of distract and deny and lie.
What I meant was that you can afford the bump in your taxes to pay for programs that actually help people, like my example of providing contraception for every woman of childbearing age in America. It's no skin off your nose, yet you act like helping people is destroying America. Well, maybe YOUR whitebread America. I say "Good riddance."
You're not at all interested in "Saving the Children"™. You're only interested in using the anti-choice movement to sucker in more Republican voters. God knows you need more to replace the ones your Führer killed with his lax response to the coronavirus and current Republican inability to support science and vaccines and masking.
Yes, I am a Psychology major. But I don't need to be one to see what you're trying to do.
25 Sep 21
@suzianne saidThe point is, for all the bantering back and forth between the 'right' and the 'left'...
Let me know when you find a point.
it does nothing really but divide us further as Americans.
Republican Conservatives listen to primarily Fox and a.m. talk radio. A Media which is extremely prejudiced against the Left. Liberal Democrats primarily listen to Main Stream Media...which is extremely prejudiced against the Right.
All you know is what you hear in the Media. All any of us know is what we hear in the Media. You don't know Trump, I don't know Trump...you don't know Biden, I don't know Biden. All we know is what our very Biased Liberal and Conservative Media Multimillionaires tell us. On both sides, they tell us what They want us to know and they do not tell us what They do not want us to know.
The point is that all of our perspectives are skewed by a Biased Media. I am more focused on the Why. Why does the Media want us to be so divided on every single issue. There is no real bipartisanship. You are a smart girl. Help me figure this one out please.
@joc44 saidIf I may? The dilemma could be solved by pure fact for discussions. Just facts. We suffer Sonhouse stuff cause he is really funny with his rage. One track mind of opinions.
The point is, for all the bantering back and forth between the 'right' and the 'left'...
it does nothing really but divide us further as Americans.
Republican Conservatives listen to primarily Fox and a.m. talk radio. A Media which is extremely prejudiced against the Left. Liberal Democrats primarily listen to Main Stream Media...which is extremely prejudiced against the ...[text shortened]... issue. There is no real bipartisanship. You are a smart girl. Help me figure this one out please.
Here is a current example. On this Forum yesterday was a comment about the horses, that the agents were hitting the migrants with the reins. There is absolutely no evidence of that. Further, there is a simple explanation. I won't write it all out, as it would confuse my point in this very post. The point is, there is no evidence, and there is an explanation.
The comments in this Forum have been saying that they were hitting the migrants. They were not. But lib media is running like crazy with this lie.
So we all know that they were not hitting the migrants. Why would I, AvJoe, waste time on issues which are based on mis-information and lies about life in our society? Why would I respond to an opinion of a writer who is treating a lie as a fact?