24 Sep 21
@joc44 saidIt IS Trump's Supreme Court.
@AverageJoe1
@suzianne said
"With Trump's Supreme Court?
They will effectively support Texas' unconstitutional move."
What Suzy is actually saying is that the Supreme Court is not the law of the land...unless she agrees with it. Suzy...in the first place darlin'...it ain't Trump's Supreme Court...it is THE Supreme Court.
In the second place, if they overturn Roe V W ...[text shortened]... 2/3 of the states to vote in another Amendment to the Constitution.
Thanks....you are a sweetheart!
The situation wouldn't be quite so dire had he not stolen Obama's selection of a Justice. Most presidents do not even get one SC pick.
Trump got THREE, on a court that was already even between liberals and conservatives. It IS certainly Trump's Supreme Court. It was Mitch McConnell's gift of fealty to him.
24 Sep 21
@averagejoe1 saidYou need a bill to enable you to kick someone from your home?
Another classic Lib ploy for everyone to see.
Shav is changing the definition of Abort. He even uses the phrase 'by definition'. Next he will re-define fetus, which today is an unborn baby.
Settle, Shav. Hey, did you see where CA governor is pushing for a bill allowing children to NOT have to disclose pregnancy and abortion problems to their parents? He i ...[text shortened]... ut of my home if they held that back from me. I know, makes me a meanie. So, then, what are they?
Typical Republican.
"Hey, I need this, so I assume everyone needs this."
24 Sep 21
@suzianne saidI just looked up Fetus. The mass in the womb (you call it 'IT"😉 is an unborn baby, according to Merriam Webster. So you are wrong, or they are wrong.
It is called a baby post-birth.
It is called a fetus pre-birth.
Just what about this is so difficult for you (and all the redneck male Texans) to understand?
@suzianne saidWhy would I do that, Suzianne?.... To contribute to their recreation. Their recreation is fine, of course, but what would I have to do with it??
Are YOU ready to support offering contraceptives to every woman of childbearing age in America?
Then just shut up.
I doubt that these folks would buy me a box kite or a frisbee, to recreate and fly with my children.
Can you tell me the difference?
24 Sep 21
@suzianne said"It IS Trump's Supreme Court". He NOMINATED 3 judges, 6 were already there. You can't say it is his court. And he did not put the 3 judges there, he only suggested them. Senators and members of congress put them there.
It IS Trump's Supreme Court.
The situation wouldn't be quite so dire had he not stolen Obama's selection of a Justice. Most presidents do not even get one SC pick.
Trump got THREE, on a court that was already even between liberals and conservatives. It IS certainly Trump's Supreme Court. It was Mitch McConnell's gift of fealty to him.
If you say, yeah, but most of them were repubs and that's not fair.....remember that the Constitution made up the process. You would thus be saying the Constitution is wrong.
SCOTUS is NOT Trump's.
24 Sep 21
@averagejoe1 saidBeing "unborn", it is not a baby.
I just looked up Fetus. The mass in the womb (you call it 'IT"😉 is an unborn baby, according to Merriam Webster. So you are wrong, or they are wrong.
Is being "unborn" anything like being "undead"?
Why not just say "not born"? That clears it up about whether it's a baby or not.
@suzianne saidLib speak, change what is in print in the dictionary?
Being "unborn", it is not a baby.
Is being "unborn" anything like being "undead"?
Why not just say "not born"? That clears it up about whether it's a baby or not.
A fetus is an unborn baby. Thus, a fetus is a baby.
What is your basis for saying that if it is unborn, it is not a baby? You lost me there.
Well, undead is to be alive. So where are you going with that, for goodness sakes?
24 Sep 21
@averagejoe1 saidStop posting when drunk.
Another classic Lib ploy for everyone to see.
Shav is changing the definition of Abort. He even uses the phrase 'by definition'. Next he will re-define fetus, which today is an unborn baby.
Settle, Shav. Hey, did you see where CA governor is pushing for a bill allowing children to NOT have to disclose pregnancy and abortion problems to their parents? He i ...[text shortened]... ut of my home if they held that back from me. I know, makes me a meanie. So, then, what are they?
24 Sep 21
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidRepublicans have always, always, always followed the prevailing winds, especially when they favor demigogic old white males. In this instance the "prevailing wind" is coming all from Trump's direction, as there are few other voices in the GOP, and almost no values or policies.
"It IS Trump's Supreme Court". He NOMINATED 3 judges, 6 were already there. You can't say it is his court. And he did not put the 3 judges there, he only suggested them. Senators and members of congress put them there.
If you say, yeah, but most of them were repubs and that's not fair.....remember that the Constitution made up the process. You would thus be saying the Constitution is wrong.
SCOTUS is NOT Trump's.
So it most certainly IS Trump's SC. Just like it IS Trump's Republican Party. Normal adults don't act like this.
24 Sep 21
@averagejoe1 saidYour 'Mickey the Dunce' is not believable, sorry.
Lib speak, change what is in print in the dictionary?
A fetus is an unborn baby. Thus, a fetus is a baby.
What is your basis for saying that if it is unborn, it is not a baby? You lost me there.
Well, undead is to be alive. So where are you going with that, for goodness sakes?
Please just admit (something I know Republicans can't do, lest they summon the ire of Trump) that you use the term "baby" because its usage when speaking about a fetus is emotional and inflammatory.
24 Sep 21
@averagejoe1 saidYou can afford it. I would bet a dollar to a donut that you gladly pay for your own "recreation" (Was her name "Stormy"? ). Would you pay one extra dollar in taxes to prevent this "holocaust" of abortion? No? Then you are, as always, a hypocrite.
Why would I do that, Suzianne?.... To contribute to their recreation. Their recreation is fine, of course, but what would I have to do with it??
I doubt that these folks would buy me a box kite or a frisbee, to recreate and fly with my children.
Can you tell me the difference?
Do you mean to say that you are NOT all that interested in "a more perfect Union"?
Perish the thought.
24 Sep 21
@shavixmir saidWrite cogent posts.
Stop posting when drunk.
Did you see where Suzianne is changing definitions like you do? This is entertainment, Shav, it really is.
24 Sep 21
@suzianne saidDid it ever occur to you that Republicans are biased against Democrats and Democrats are biased against Republicans?
Republicans have always, always, always followed the prevailing winds, especially when they favor demigogic old white males. In this instance the "prevailing wind" is coming all from Trump's direction, as there are few other voices in the GOP, and almost no values or policies.
So it most certainly IS Trump's SC. Just like it IS Trump's Republican Party. Normal adults don't act like this.
Don't you find that a bit...strange? Hmmm...almost like someone wants to divide America....I wonder why that is. Any thoughts at all sweetheart?
25 Sep 21
@joc44 saidLet me know when you find a point.
Did it ever occur to you that Republicans are biased against Democrats and Democrats are biased against Republicans?
Don't you find that a bit...strange? Hmmm...almost like someone wants to divide America....I wonder why that is. Any thoughts at all sweetheart?