Originally posted by FMFYou want a debate yet you quote an article from the CHRISTIAN science monitor?
[b]The whole article is here:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0425/p07s03-wome.htm[/b]
Give me a break. Gee, I wonder who's side the christian science monitor is on????? No bias there...noooo, none at all.
Stick the the BBC, CBC, etc. or don't bother.
Originally posted by uzless"The Christian Science Monitor is a daily international newspaper published Monday through Friday. Mary Baker Eddy founded the publication in 1908 and it is published by The First Church of Christ, Scientist in Boston, Massachusetts. It is highly regarded in the secular world, with little religious propaganda. There is one religious article which appears each day in the Home Forum (due to the request of the paper's founder). The paper has won seven Pulitzers and is considered an independent voice in journalism.
You want a debate yet you quote an article from the CHRISTIAN science monitor?
Give me a break. Gee, I wonder who's side the christian science monitor is on????? No bias there...noooo, none at all.
Stick the the BBC, CBC, etc. or don't bother.
GRANNY.
Originally posted by smw6869That quote is taken direct from the website, wait for it....
"The Christian Science Monitor is a daily international newspaper published Monday through Friday. Mary Baker Eddy founded the publication in 1908 and it is published by The First Church of Christ, Scientist in Boston, Massachusetts. It is highly regarded in the secular world, with little religious propaganda. There is one religious article which appears eac paper has won seven Pulitzers and is considered an independent voice in journalism.
GRANNY.
www.allaboutcults.org
Way to improve the credibility here. 😞
http://www.allaboutcults.org/christian-science-monitor-faq.htm
Is it take your moron to work day today or what???
Look it's simple. In a nut shell, Revelations talks about Israel needing to exist at the time of the 2nd coming or else everyone will go to hell.
If Israel does exist then the Christians will be taken to heaven.
So any article the Christian Science Monitor writes about israel and the middle east can't be seen as being unbiased.
Isn't that obvious?
Originally posted by uzlessListen up pin prick. I'm talking about the NEWSPAPER, not the religion.
That quote is taken direct from the website, wait for it....
www.allaboutcults.org
Way to improve the credibility here. 😞
http://www.allaboutcults.org/christian-science-monitor-faq.htm
Is it take your moron to work day today or what???
The Religion is for Nincompoops!
GRANNY.
Originally posted by SeitseYou are a strange chap. If this is all some kind of attempted ironic funny thing, I'd say it's falling flat.
And FMF, may that PM be the last time you PM me, freak. That is stalking. The jokes, no matter how heated, stay in the public forums. Understood, idiot?
On the Thread I started about Israel you posted this: So, when your friend Larry and you will go back to the motel?
I PM'd you - out of a kind of courtesy, I suppose - to say [and this is the entire text...]Sorry, I don't bother with youtube links so I don't know what the Larry reference is seeing as arguably it needed to be said - as your Larry comment (whatever it meant) was addressed directly at me - but was of no real relevance viz a viz the Thread.
You then PM'd me with this: In the public forums we all crack jokes with everybody, heated or foolish ones but meaningless, impersonal jokes... and that is what they are and they are in the public. Thus, extend me the courtesy of keeping it there, and don't ever PM me again, freak.
And then you posted this to the Thread itself: And FMF, may that PM be the last time you PM me, freak. That is stalking. The jokes, no matter how heated, stay in the public forums. Understood, idiot?
It's difficult to know what to make of all this. Heated? What was heated? The only things that've been heated are your PM to me and its little counterpart on the Thread. If you were hoping for some witty repartee about the Lenny reference, I was unable to engage you - so I told you so, But heated?
Originally posted by uzlessFirst, why would the CSR be on the Palestinian side, rather than the Israeli?
You want a debate yet you quote an article from the CHRISTIAN science monitor?
Second, that story was first published in the Independent, a British newspaper. It's been widely republished since -- the Independent must have a syndication deal with the CSR amongst others -- like www.haaretz.com, currently featuring a nice banner ad inviting you to 'meet Jewish singles in your area' ( http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/974908.html )
Third, you say that 'both sides must grow up'. Which side are the Israeli Bedouins oppressed by their own state supposed to be on?
Do you have any other spectacularly stupid comments or will you be going to spank yourself in the Irrelevant Forum?
Originally posted by FMFSeitse gets a little hot under the collar when something about Israel comes up - he rarely makes any real sense when he's in this state of mind, so it's best to just ignore him if you discuss anything with bearing on Israel or Jews...
You are a strange chap. If this is all some kind of attempted ironic funny thing, I'd say it's falling flat.
On the Thread I started about Israel you posted this: [b]So, when your friend Larry and you will go back to the motel? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw2h10iExWQ
I PM'd you - out of a kind of courtesy, I suppose - to say [and this is the entire ...[text shortened]... nny reference, I was unable to engage you - so I told you so, But heated?[/b]
Originally posted by SeitseJust thought it was funny to hear you accuse someone else of being obsessed with another poster.
stay away mike, we all know i can clean the floor with you easily, simply going ad hominem with the bitterness at your old age from a failed political career... then again, it's not as if communism has a lot of future, lol
And then you accuse me of going ad hominem.
🙄